Kavanaugh Official Merge for Oct 2nd, 2018

[g5000]

Nobody cares

they've already shown they don't care what bullshit they are in rage about, just so long as they get their way. lying is cool. defamation is cool. destroying our political process is cool. as long as they get what THEY want NOW.

but man alive does their ass hurt when these tactics come back to them.

they've already shown they don't care what bullshit they are in rage about, just so long as they get their way. lying is cool.

The OP just showed you that Kavanaugh has lied under oath, fool.
Lied about knowing one of the accusers no less.

It appears Kavanaugh lied several times under oath.

 

[toobfreak]

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering.

Pure Rubbish. SOP for any such instance in preparing a 308 for the FBI. Learn to get your facts straight before putting your foot in your mouth.

 

[g5000]

Kavanaugh is clearly being advised by Trump to never admit to anything.

 

[bodecea]

Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

good god, stop it already. the ONLY thing you are doing is setting up a hell of a "payback" when the dems get around to making their next selection.

all your fake rage is really getting old as shit. the more you push the bullshit the more no one cares about a ******* thing you say. it's the whole CRY WOLF thing beating to holy hell and back.

the left has lost it and they don't even know it. that's the sad part. at this point the left is showing it's just fine to lie about someone. turn molehills into mountains and scream bloody murder to attack someone. but if that someone does ANYTHING to defend their side, well hell, that's just another foul to ***** about.

the right has to follow morality and law to the uber-letter. the left? not so much. hell, not at all.

So he didn't deliberately lie under oath then?

"not deliberately lie"? Is that a thing?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

YALE FAIL!


Yale classmate says Kavanaugh has "not told the truth"

NO link and not credible.... Nice FAIL

oh gee, no link so i guess it just didn't happen then, huh?




"I can unequivocally say that in denying the possibility that he ever blacked out from drinking, and in downplaying the degree and frequency of his drinking, Brett has not told the truth," Chad Ludington said in a statement to CNN.
Ludington said in the statement he often drank with Kavanaugh when they were classmates, and said Kavanaugh had played down "the degree and frequency" of his drinking in his testimony. Ludington said he often saw Kavanaugh "staggering from alcohol consumption," and said he often became "belligerent and aggressive" while drinking.
In his testimony to the judiciary committee Thursday, Kavanaugh denied ever blacking out from drinking.
Ludington said in his statement he witnessed Kavanaugh throw a beer in a man's face once for making a semi-hostile remark, "starting a fight that ended with one of our mutual friends in jail."
View attachment 219845
READ: Yale classmate's full statement on Kavanaugh
"It is truth that is at stake," Ludington said

So another leftist.......
Chad Ludington: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com

 

[toobfreak]

This is a sign of victory for those who don't support rape.

You must be one of those dimwits that thinks disagreeing with Obama is proof of racism and doubting the words of a slanderer claiming molestation without a shred of evidence but her word means you're defending rape.

 

[Pop23]

Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

So there are pictures of them actually interacting or is there just a pic where they’re not even acknowledging each other and that’s “proof” they interacted?

The picture actually looks like she photobombed it. And even if she didn't, she's is a picture with someone who did this horrible act, one no one can seem to back up, and looks to be enjoying herself?

Odd, dontcha think?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements.

The New York Times was contacting dozens of his classmates, asking for confirmation before spiking the non-story.
You're surprised that word got back to Kavanaugh's team? LOL!

now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering.

Apparently he's tampering with non-witnesses. DERP!

Apparently he's tampering with non-witnesses. DERP!

Just his accuser, dope.

The one he testified he didn't know.

 

[Pop23]

HRC was President and the Dems controlled the Senate, and Kav was a Leftist. Would the Dems defend Kav and call Ford a liar and would the GOP defend Ford and call Kav unfit?

I bet yes.

This is totally political. Nothing to do with what actually happened. IMO.

Thoughts?

The Women that stepped forward would be crucified, like the ones that HRC crucified that spoke up against Hound Dog Bill.

 

[toobfreak]

lying is cool. defamation is cool. destroying our political process is cool.

RIGHT ON THE HEAD. The Left are like little children who never grew up who are out to steal light bulbs, vandalize, lies, obstruct, cause anarchy just to see how far they can get. It's the thrill of the criminal mind.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering.

Pure Rubbish. SOP for any such instance in preparing a 308 for the FBI. Learn to get your facts straight before putting your foot in your mouth.

What the hell does that have to do with anything? Are you saying that the FBI told him to deny knowing about Ramirez's allegations? The FBI told him to claim that he didn't remember something happening when just three days prior he'd received a photo showing it happened?

 

[OldLady]

HRC was President and the Dems controlled the Senate, and Kav was a Leftist. Would the Dems defend Kav and call Ford a liar and would the GOP defend Ford and call Kav unfit?

I bet yes.

This is totally political. Nothing to do with what actually happened. IMO.

Thoughts?

Pretty much. All the Dems but one had decided to vote no anyway. The accusations couldn't be ignored though. Even though the Republicans gave it a good try.

 

[RealDave]

Nobody cares

We know you & your ilk don't care about Truth & honesty otherwise we would not to look at Trump's fast face every day.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

So there are pictures of them actually interacting or is there just a pic where they’re not even acknowledging each other and that’s “proof” they interacted?

The picture actually looks like she photobombed it. And even if she didn't, she's is a picture with someone who did this horrible act, one no one can seem to back up, and looks to be enjoying herself?

Odd, dontcha think?

Ok, good times. But the fact remains that Kavvy lied under oath.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements.

The New York Times was contacting dozens of his classmates, asking for confirmation before spiking the non-story.
You're surprised that word got back to Kavanaugh's team? LOL!

now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering.

Apparently he's tampering with non-witnesses. DERP!

what i don't get is "witness tampering"

i thought this was NOT a criminal investigation OR trial?

the shit she comes up with.

what i don't get is "witness tampering"

i thought this was NOT a criminal investigation OR trial?

the shit she comes up with.

You dont get much, dope.

1729. Protection Of Government Processes -- Tampering With Victims, Witnesses, Or Informants -- 18 U.S.C. 1512

"Section 1512 of Title 18 constitutes a broad prohibition against tampering with a witness, victim or informant. It proscribes conduct intended to illegitimately affect the presentation of evidence in Federal proceedings or the communication of information to Federal law enforcement officers. It applies to proceedings before Congress, executive departments, and administrative agencies, and to civil and criminal judicial proceedings, including grand jury proceedings."

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It makes her a hypocrite, you Holocaust denier. Duh.

What is hypocritical about being for women's rights and "sporting a stripper"?

Because while she works for dollar bills, Avenatti makes tens of thousands off her. Exploitation is terrible. Duh. Stupid, holocaust denying leftist.

So...lawyers are exploitation?

What does that question even mean? Lawyers are lawyers.

You said....and I quote " Avenatti makes tens of thousand off of her. Exploitation is terrible." Avenatti is her lawyer. What is so exploitational about being her lawyer?

I can answer this. Do you really want me to or are you just trolling? I ask because you obviously know the answer.

 

[Pop23]

Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

So there are pictures of them actually interacting or is there just a pic where they’re not even acknowledging each other and that’s “proof” they interacted?

The picture actually looks like she photobombed it. And even if she didn't, she's is a picture with someone who did this horrible act, one no one can seem to back up, and looks to be enjoying herself?

Odd, dontcha think?

Ok, good times. But the fact remains that Kavvy lied under oath.

Or simply can't remember, how many times did Dr. (cough cough) Ford use that?

 

[iceberg]

all your fake rage

You have me confused with someone else.

not at all.

rage on.

 

[Anathema]

these days are go[ne] Bubba.

No they’re not. The club has been replaced with other implements but the theory is still the same.

Every relationship is a business transaction in one way or another.

 

[toobfreak]

Kavvy testified under oath that he first learned about the Debbie Ramirez allegations when he read about them in the New Yorker. But new reports indicate that he was lying yet again. Before the story broke Kavvy was anticipating the allegations and scrambling to get ahead of the story, contacting Yale classmates and mutual friends of Ramirez's, asking for public endorsements. Kavvy wanted to set the tone of the discussion that was about to happen over the impending accusations, hoping to track down a picture of that showed him and Ramirez smiling along side each other, having a good time with friends a wedding years after college. Kavvy eventually got a copy of the picture on September 22nd. But three days later he told staffers for the Senate Judiciary committee that he couldn't remember if he had any interaction with Ramirez.

The man is a continual liar, and now it turns out he is effectively witness tampering. This is not someone who belongs on the Supreme Court.

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

The texts between Berchem and Karen Yarasavage, both friends of Kavanaugh, suggest that the nominee was personally talking with former classmates about Ramirez’s story in advance of the New Yorker article that made her allegation public. In one message, Yarasavage said Kavanaugh asked her to go on the record in his defense. Two other messages show communication between Kavanaugh's team and former classmates in advance of the story.

good god, stop it already. the ONLY thing you are doing is setting up a hell of a "payback" when the dems get around to making their next selection.

all your fake rage is really getting old as shit. the more you push the bullshit the more no one cares about a ******* thing you say. it's the whole CRY WOLF thing beating to holy hell and back.

the left has lost it and they don't even know it. that's the sad part. at this point the left is showing it's just fine to lie about someone. turn molehills into mountains and scream bloody murder to attack someone. but if that someone does ANYTHING to defend their side, well hell, that's just another foul to ***** about.

the right has to follow morality and law to the uber-letter. the left? not so much. hell, not at all.

So looking for the truth is partisan now?

What a deplorable attitude.

If any of the Democrats were "looking for the truth" they would:

1. Not have been announcing their dire absolute opposition to Kavanaugh before they even met him.
2. Would be equally interested to vet Ford and these others of their lies, gaps, motives, background and inconsistencies rather than take everything they say unquestioned.