Karoline Levitt Threatened by the US Supreme Court brilliantly defended herself.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Barrett seems to have that "do you know who I am" attitude. She obviously thinks she deserves special treatment because of her position. She thinks she is protected from negative speech that everyone else in America deals with every day. She's an uppity liberal *****. So what is this bullshit that we have a conservative Supreme Court. Roberts and Barrett are solid liberals. We need to replace the sickly Sotomayor with someone like Karoline Leavitt to restore the courts credibility.
 
As if that makes any difference.

My understanding is Mark Meadows and Mitch McConnell recommended Barrett to him, but deceptively not making him aware that she was a liberal.
You don't know what the **** you're saying. Heritage... Ever hear of them?

 
I'm wondering why this is being delivered in a stilted and poorly formed AI voice.

Did this really happen? Is there a court record of this confrontation?

If it is true, Levitt delivered this century's ultimate smackdown.
 
You don't know what the **** you're saying. Heritage... Ever hear of them?

Holy ****.

He said nothing about Trump nominating her. He said that the fact Trump nominated her means nothing.

Learn to ******* read.
 
I didn't mention Trump. Learn how to ******* read, you ******* ignorant moron.
He did you stupid front-hole.

He was replying to a statement that Barrett was a Trump appointee. He stated that it did not matter.

You made some remarkably stupid statement about Barrett being a Trump appointee in a link.

I'll now state that who appointed her isn't material to the discussion of the alleged SCOTUS confrontation.

Now, take you nonreasing ass the **** away from me.
 
Few watching Karoline Levitt win fights with her.
See this discussion of when the Supreme Court yanked her before them to cite her for contempt.
The Court admitted her defense was brilliant.

See it happen.


This...never....happened.

Too funny~
 
15th post
He did you stupid front-hole.

He was replying to a statement that Barrett was a Trump appointee. He stated that it did not matter.

You made some remarkably stupid statement about Barrett being a Trump appointee in a link.

I'll now state that who appointed her isn't material to the discussion of the alleged SCOTUS confrontation.

Now, take you nonreasing ass the **** away from me.
You keep digging your hole. You should just keep your dumbass mouth shut and let mudwhistle get corrected like I did for him.
 
She has brains too ;):thup:

Apparently. When I see her at press briefings, I thought she always seemed too willing and eager trying too hard to please everyone. But I guess that is just me--- I was born uncooperative.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom