Kamala’s brand is so damaged, she is unlikely to win Dem Cali Gubernatorial bid, megadonors have stopped donating

Harris was nothing more (or less) than example of how brain-dead the American Left has become. She was an awful candidate with awful ideas and yet she STILL got enough votes to make it a contest. She was worse than an empty suit, but they still voted for her.

When she ran for President, she didn't even get any support from her home state, which in itself is astounding. The ONLY reason why Biden chose her for VP was as "impeachment insurance." He knew that no matter how bad he was - and he was terrible - there would never be any movement to impeach him BECAUSE OF HER.

How delusional would she have to be to even imagine that she is popular enough in California to be governor?
Keep in mind, Kamala accused Biden of basically being a racist during the DNC Presidential run.

I think it compelled him to then choose her as his running mate.

But Biden saying he was going to choose a "black woman" for VP instead of choosing the best candidate should be a learning moment for those on the Left, which will sadly never come.
 
Yawn! You want to cling to that dumb ass democratic racism narrative but the republican candidate ran on overt racism and republicans who claim they aren't racists but demcrats are voted for him. So your argument has no merit, and it just shows how ignorantly partisan you are.
You cannot deny that millions of democrats who supposedly voted for the old white guy refused to vote for the Indian woman, no matter how much you stomp your feet, hold your breath and wail that Orange Man Bad. If Kamala (what have I been doing for 4 years?) Harris had just gotten all the democrat votes that Quid Pro Joe had, she would have won easily. You say she was a strong candidate with a clear message who communicated very effectively. If that's the case, the only conclusion is that democrats have a racism and sexism problem.

This is undeniable. Of course, you COULD admit that she was not a good candidate, but then you might get a "visit".
 

She went from running for POTUS to not even being able to easily secure a bid to be governor of her home state?

YIKES.

She is the same person she was in November. What changed?
I don't think she can ever get over her word salads. I'd rather listen to fingernails on a chalkboard.
 

She went from running for POTUS to not even being able to easily secure a bid to be governor of her home state?

YIKES.

She is the same person she was in November. What changed?

The really sad thing (for Dems) is that they don't have anyone else. She's the big star of the party, nationally. After her, it's ghetto tier trash like AOC, Crockett, and Mamdani.

In California alone, the pickings are even worse. Pervert Adam Schiff? The gangbanger chick in SoCal who told the cholos to attack ICE? LOL!
 
Her brand was not weak. That's why she drew record crowds. It is apparent that Harris scares the old boy white man network.

What the **** is woke white man?

Seems like woke is a substituted word whites use because they don't want to use the N word. Kitanje Jackson was as qualified by judicial time on the federal bench as the Chief Justice and was far more qualified than Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch. Poorly qualified whites have been in every administration, and there has never been anyone questioning their picks like this.

There was no woke wing coalition; there was a coalition to pick the most qualified cabinet, which is what Biden had, and it was that cabinet that delivered us safely out of COVID, set a record economy, produced the lowest unemployment rates, and that included lower black unemployment than Trump. Furthermore, it was Blacks who delivered the presidency for Biden, so he did try to keep promises to us, unlike other Presidents. This shit is tired

Harris is not a weak candidate, and by all accounts, you don't know what Harris did. What did Pence do? What did Biden do when he was VP? What did GHW Bush do when he was VP? Your post is a classic "I don't like her because she's black" opinion. It's full of double standards you didn't apply to ANY other vice president.

The OP cites an article from PJMedia.

PJ Media – Bias and Credibility​

PJ Media bias is rated as Right Conservative with a lack of credibility and reliability in reporting factual information.


I think this says all that needs to be said.
She drew so many crowds Trump kicked her ass into forever irrelevance.

WOKE literally means people who have wised up to democracks who lie about all things and destroy everything they have a hand in.
 
She drew so many crowds Trump kicked her ass into forever irrelevance.

WOKE literally means people who have wised up to democracks who lie about all things and destroy everything they have a hand in.
She drew crowds of those who were already in the tank for her. What she failed to do was draw the independents and unhappy Republicans. They couldn't stand her. She even lost millions of democrats who voted for Quid Pro Joe.

Unless the democrat party acknowledges that she was simply way in over her head and was a terrible candidate, they're just going to repeat the disaster.
 
Her 'brand' is damaged? No she's a blithering idiot. That was true before she ever had a brand.
She was VP, that does have a little clout.

We know she is a dumb ****. But how many millions of lefties wanted her to be President?
 
Her brand was not weak. That's why she drew record crowds. It is apparent that Harris scares the old boy white man network.

What the **** is woke white man?
It appears you make your judgements solely on race, as well as your criticisms. Perhaps you need some self reflection and an ability to adapt to making critical judgments divorced entirely from race and based solely on performance and ones actual track record and list of achievements, or lack thereof.

The source in this argument remains irrelevant.
 
It appears you make your judgements solely on race, as well as your criticisms. Perhaps you need some self reflection and an ability to adapt to making critical judgments divorced entirely from race and based solely on performance and ones actual track record and list of achievements, or lack thereof.

The source in this argument remains irrelevant.

Good on you! Get these nasty racists out of your party, and things will start looking up.
 
Her brand was not weak. That's why she drew record crowds. It is apparent that Harris scares the old boy white man network.

What the **** is woke white man?

Seems like woke is a substituted word whites use because they don't want to use the N word. Kitanje Jackson was as qualified by judicial time on the federal bench as the Chief Justice and was far more qualified than Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch. Poorly qualified whites have been in every administration, and there has never been anyone questioning their picks like this.

There was no woke wing coalition; there was a coalition to pick the most qualified cabinet, which is what Biden had, and it was that cabinet that delivered us safely out of COVID, set a record economy, produced the lowest unemployment rates, and that included lower black unemployment than Trump. Furthermore, it was Blacks who delivered the presidency for Biden, so he did try to keep promises to us, unlike other Presidents. This shit is tired

Harris is not a weak candidate, and by all accounts, you don't know what Harris did. What did Pence do? What did Biden do when he was VP? What did GHW Bush do when he was VP? Your post is a classic "I don't like her because she's black" opinion. It's full of double standards you didn't apply to ANY other vice president.

The OP cites an article from PJMedia.

PJ Media – Bias and Credibility​

PJ Media bias is rated as Right Conservative with a lack of credibility and reliability in reporting factual information.


I think this says all that needs to be said.

The only thing keeping your shitty little racist party in the game right now is old white people.

Look at those "No Kings" (lol) protests! They all looked like outings from a retirement home for white people. :badgrin:
 
My favorite period of potus runs was the final stretch of this last one. The look on kamala's face was so telling, and that was perhaps the only time in her political career she wasnt fluff or lying.
 
My favorite period of potus runs was the final stretch of this last one. The look on kamala's face was so telling, and that was perhaps the only time in her political career she wasnt fluff or lying.

Mine was the Trump/Biden debate when it became perfectly clear Biden's brain was mush and it was too late in the game to beat Trump
 
It appears you make your judgements solely on race, as well as your criticisms. Perhaps you need some self reflection and an ability to adapt to making critical judgments divorced entirely from race and based solely on performance and ones actual track record and list of achievements, or lack thereof.

The source in this argument remains irrelevant.
It appears that's what YOU did when you made your comment about the woke coalition. I'm tired of whites using that stale line about people making judgments race when you are calling out for doing that.

No Vice president was scrutinized as much for whatever that VP was doing then Harris. Nobody ever pays attention t a VP, but suddenly this time, the VP needed to do something to raise their profile. I've been black all my life and I've seen how things happen for blacks who are in such positions, so this isn't based on me making judgments based race, It is me making judgements based on 64 years of living as a black person in America watching whites making judgments based on race then denying they did so.

The source of the argument is indeed relevant because a right-wing extremist source, which means it is a racist source. And since Harris outdrew Trump in attendance and raised way more money, she was not a weak candidate. So what we are actually looking at here is the white right wing smearing Harris, hoping to damage her with voters. Thisis what has happened when the white establishment is scared of a black leader.
 
15th post
Mine was the Trump/Biden debate when it became perfectly clear Biden's brain was mush and it was too late in the game to beat Trump
You didn't see that trump was just as bad or worse. Like millions, I watched the debate between Biden and Trump, so let me say something about the Trump and Biden debate.

While I may not be entirely correct, my understanding of debate is that each party presents a factual argument, followed by rebuttals from both sides using evidence-based reasoning. During the debate between Trump and Biden, Biden struggled with recalling facts, while Trump frequently made false statements throughout the event. Now in my understanding of debating, being able to lie frequently, forcefully and with confidence is not offering a factual rebuttal. The capacity to lie with assurance does not inherently reflect high cognitive aptitude.

In grading the debate, PolitiFact cited 15 lies by Trump, plus an additional claim they put in the pants on fire category, while finding 3 for Biden. The New York Times cited 20 false statements and 21 more that were inaccurate, lacking context or evidence for Trump, no false statements for Biden, and 11 that were inaccurate, lacking context or evidence. The Associated Press corrected Trump 11 times as compared to 4 for Biden. CNN cited 30 false statements for Trump and at least 9 for Biden. Each of these evaluations showed that Trump told many more lies, made many more misstatements, and said things that had absolutely no evidence supporting them, yet the debate was framed as a show of Biden's cognitive decline. I watched that debate and saw no winner.

But you only saw that Biden's brain was mush.
 
You didn't see that trump was just as bad or worse. Like millions, I watched the debate between Biden and Trump, so let me say something about the Trump and Biden debate.

While I may not be entirely correct, my understanding of debate is that each party presents a factual argument, followed by rebuttals from both sides using evidence-based reasoning. During the debate between Trump and Biden, Biden struggled with recalling facts, while Trump frequently made false statements throughout the event. Now in my understanding of debating, being able to lie frequently, forcefully and with confidence is not offering a factual rebuttal. The capacity to lie with assurance does not inherently reflect high cognitive aptitude.

In grading the debate, PolitiFact cited 15 lies by Trump, plus an additional claim they put in the pants on fire category, while finding 3 for Biden. The New York Times cited 20 false statements and 21 more that were inaccurate, lacking context or evidence for Trump, no false statements for Biden, and 11 that were inaccurate, lacking context or evidence. The Associated Press corrected Trump 11 times as compared to 4 for Biden. CNN cited 30 false statements for Trump and at least 9 for Biden. Each of these evaluations showed that Trump told many more lies, made many more misstatements, and said things that had absolutely no evidence supporting them, yet the debate was framed as a show of Biden's cognitive decline. I watched that debate and saw no winner.

But you only saw that Biden's brain was mush.

Oh shut up. You're just annoying
 
Back
Top Bottom