Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump

[Synthaholic]

had interviews asking her what she’s done as Border Czar

Another lie.

Don't post shit if you're not willing to back it up.

 

[Synthaholic]

Yes, Kamala Harris Was the Border Czar

Now that Vice President Kamala Harris is the leading contender for the Democrat party’s presidential nomination, the corporate media are gaslighting the public to a degree many of us never thought possible. The latest Orwellian history rewri...

www.americanthinker.com

And then you prove me correct by posting Rightwing Media.

I love it!

 

[Lisa558]

Yes, by Rightwing Media.

OFFS. Don’t you enablers realize there is no official title “czar,” but that it’s used to refer to the person put in charge of a specific area? Like the drug czar?

We all know you “transformers” are desperate to erase Harris’ radical left background and her total incompetence, but the KNOWN fact is that Biden assigned her ONE job - to solve or at least improve the disaster at the border - and she made things worse.

We have been infiltrated by America-haters at the top of government, and that is why they are working to get as many lowlifes, criminals, and terrorists here from foreign countries.

 

[Lisa558]

Another lie.

Don't post shit if you're not willing to back it up.

Don’t keep denying the truth, you transformer. Everyone knows she was put in charge of the border.

 

[otto105]

I just posted this a minute ago. No way you read the article. You just automatically go on autopilot to defend a DEI pick who was charged with solving the border crisis, and instead made it worse.

She’s a total incompetent, picking because Female Blacks are the new “superhero.”

It’s a few in the media calling her a czar, but the Biden Administration never called her that.

 

[otto105]

OFFS. Don’t you enablers realize there is no official title “czar,” but that it’s used to refer to the person put in charge of a specific area? Like the drug czar?

We all know you “transformers” are desperate to erase Harris’ radical left background and her total incompetence, but the KNOWN fact is that Biden assigned her ONE job - to solve or at least improve the disaster at the border - and she made things worse.

We have been infiltrated by America-haters at the top of government, and that is why they are working to get as many lowlifes, criminals, and terrorists here from foreign countries.

Was she then put in charge of the border as opposed to researching root causes of migration from the three triangle countries in Central America.

Christ Lisa get your shit propaganda together.

 

[JohnDB]

How does University of California fit into this theory?

Money laundering....no different than Google.

 

[otto105]

Money laundering....no different than Google.

Explain

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

It's like they want to lose again.


Republicans expected to block Child Tax Cut expansion

Presidential politics will be front-and-center on the Senate floor today as Senate Republicans are expected to block legislation to cut taxes for working families and extend some corporate tax breaks, probably dooming a bipartisan compromise that the House had overwhelmingly approved and raising the stakes on taxes for this fall’s elections, our colleague Jacob Bogage reports.

 

[Lisa558]

It's like they want to lose again.


Republicans expected to block Child Tax Cut expansion

Presidential politics will be front-and-center on the Senate floor today as Senate Republicans are expected to block legislation to cut taxes for working families and extend some corporate tax breaks, probably dooming a bipartisan compromise that the House had overwhelmingly approved and raising the stakes on taxes for this fall’s elections, our colleague Jacob Bogage reports.

We need more details. The last time there was an expansion, it was expanded to include families earning more than $200,00 a year.

A single widow getting by on $50,000 a year - a combination of social security and a modest annuity - should not have to subsidize a lawyer’s child care costs. She is already paying for their education. Let the affluent parents support their own 4-year-olds.

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[otto105]

We need more details. The last time there was an expansion, it was expanded to include families earning more than $200,00 a year.

A single widow getting by on $50,000 a year - a combination of social security and a modest annuity - should not have to subsidize a lawyer’s child care costs. She is already paying for their education. Let the affluent parents support their own 4-year-olds.

Strawman argument from lisa.

 

[Lisa558]

Strawman argument from lisa.

^^^ meaningless retort for Otto, who can’t address the point.

 

[otto105]

^^^ meaningless retort for Otto, who can’t address the point.

I'm under no assumption that responding to your lies will forward a discussion.

 

[Lisa558]

I'm under no assumption that responding to your lies will forward a discussion.

^^^ and then the crass libtard pulls out the “lies” lie.