Kamala Harris Gaslights American Men in Latest Dumpster Fire Interview

[Billiejeens]

It finally happened. Two of the least impressive figures in modern politics sat down for a conversation that was about as enlightening as a flickering lightbulb.

Yes, Al Sharpton, MSNBC’s professional race-baiter, interviewed Kamala Harris on Politics Nation, which aired Sunday evening.

If you missed it, don’t worry—you didn’t miss much.

Sharpton kicked things off by asking Harris about her dismal support among men, particularly black men.

It’s no secret that Harris has struggled with this demographic, so much so that Democrats have dragged out Barack Obama to guilt-trip black men into supporting her.

Earlier this month, Obama basically gave a lecture to the “brothers,” telling them they had to vote for Harris. Well, it backfired spectacularly.

Black men didn’t just ignore Obama’s plea—they blasted him for it.

So what’s the Harris camp’s next genius move? Roll out “White Dudes for Harris.”

Because nothing says relatable like white liberal men trying to convince other men to vote for a vice president who’s been a disaster.

That strategy didn’t just flop—it got roasted by none other than Donald Trump at the Al Smith charity dinner.

“There’s a group called ‘White Dudes for Harris,’” Trump quipped, “but I’m not worried about them at all, because their wives and their wives’ lovers are all voting for me.” Classic Trump.

But let’s get back to Sharpton’s hard-hitting journalism.

He asked Harris if the lack of male support was because of—you guessed it—misogyny.

“Do you think some of the resistance of some men—black and white—is misogynist?”

Sharpton asked, clearly fishing for the usual narrative. Harris’s answer? A predictable word salad that basically boiled down to “yes.” Because in the world of Kamala Harris, if you don’t support her, you must be a misogynist.

It’s never her policies, her incompetence, or her failure to connect with voters—nope, it’s always someone else’s fault.

Kamala Harris Gaslights American Men in Latest Dumpster Fire Interview – Potus Toast

potustoast.com

BJ-

Sharpton and Harris -
Dey be pulling out all da stops.
Seriously though - this is not going to end well for Harris.

 

[Mashmont]

It finally happened. Two of the least impressive figures in modern politics sat down for a conversation that was about as enlightening as a flickering lightbulb.

Yes, Al Sharpton, MSNBC’s professional race-baiter, interviewed Kamala Harris on Politics Nation, which aired Sunday evening.

If you missed it, don’t worry—you didn’t miss much.

Sharpton kicked things off by asking Harris about her dismal support among men, particularly black men.

It’s no secret that Harris has struggled with this demographic, so much so that Democrats have dragged out Barack Obama to guilt-trip black men into supporting her.

Earlier this month, Obama basically gave a lecture to the “brothers,” telling them they had to vote for Harris. Well, it backfired spectacularly.

Black men didn’t just ignore Obama’s plea—they blasted him for it.

So what’s the Harris camp’s next genius move? Roll out “White Dudes for Harris.”

Because nothing says relatable like white liberal men trying to convince other men to vote for a vice president who’s been a disaster.

That strategy didn’t just flop—it got roasted by none other than Donald Trump at the Al Smith charity dinner.

“There’s a group called ‘White Dudes for Harris,’” Trump quipped, “but I’m not worried about them at all, because their wives and their wives’ lovers are all voting for me.” Classic Trump.

But let’s get back to Sharpton’s hard-hitting journalism.

He asked Harris if the lack of male support was because of—you guessed it—misogyny.

“Do you think some of the resistance of some men—black and white—is misogynist?”

Sharpton asked, clearly fishing for the usual narrative. Harris’s answer? A predictable word salad that basically boiled down to “yes.” Because in the world of Kamala Harris, if you don’t support her, you must be a misogynist.

It’s never her policies, her incompetence, or her failure to connect with voters—nope, it’s always someone else’s fault.

Kamala Harris Gaslights American Men in Latest Dumpster Fire Interview – Potus Toast

potustoast.com

BJ-

Sharpton and Harris -
Dey be pulling out all da stops.
Seriously though - this is not going to end well for Harris.

Calling black men misogynistic is bound to be a winner. In sure guys like Charles Barkley are very repentant and contrite after hearing that

 

[pknopp]

She was asked if misogyny plays a role. It clearly does.

She has an affair with a married man that had been separated from his wife for years. She gets called all kinds of names.

Trump has affairs while his wife sits home with their new baby and then he goes on the media and brags about it and well, nudge, nudge, wink, wink.

 

[1srelluc]

Meh, if misogyny plays a minor role in defeating FKH then I see it as a good thing.

 

[Billiejeens]

Meh, if misogyny plays a minor role in defeating FKH then I see it as a good thing.

Whatever is effective.

 

[Mashmont]

She was asked if misogyny plays a role. It clearly does.

She has an affair with a married man that had been separated from his wife for years. She gets called all kinds of names.

It’s the latest leftwing talking point that separation somehow justifies adultery.

 

[pknopp]

It’s the latest leftwing talking point that separation somehow justifies adultery.

What does justify it? Multiple times?

 

[Hellokitty]

She was asked if misogyny plays a role. It clearly does.

She has an affair with a married man that had been separated from his wife for years. She gets called all kinds of names.

Trump has affairs while his wife sits home with their new baby and then he goes on the media and brags about it and well, nudge, nudge, wink, wink.

GTFOH, Harris had no problem marrying Duggie who had affairs and abused women.

 

[pknopp]

GTFOH, Harris had no problem marrying Duggie who had affairs and abused women.

And Trump has no problem having affairs and bragging about them.

 

[Hellokitty]

And Trump has no problem having affairs and bragging about them.

So TRUMP's honest and doesn't lie about stuff like working at McDonalds...

 

[pknopp]

So TRUMP's honest and doesn't lie about stuff like working at McDonalds...

Nope. Trump is as dishonest as they come.

But not the point.

 

[Soupnazi630]

She was asked if misogyny plays a role. It clearly does.

She has an affair with a married man that had been separated from his wife for years. She gets called all kinds of names.

Trump has affairs while his wife sits home with their new baby and then he goes on the media and brags about it and well, nudge, nudge, wink, wink.

Clearly you are full of shit

Misogyny plays no role. Yes she got called all kinds of names for sleeping around, Including putting out for Brown in order to jump start her career.

Yes Trump is a philandering idiot who banged a famous porn star among others And he ALSO GETS called all kinds of names for it.

On this particular subject they are both treated fair and equal

So much for the misogyny myth

 

[Independent thinker]

It finally happened. Two of the least impressive figures in modern politics sat down for a conversation that was about as enlightening as a flickering lightbulb.

Yes, Al Sharpton, MSNBC’s professional race-baiter, interviewed Kamala Harris on Politics Nation, which aired Sunday evening.

If you missed it, don’t worry—you didn’t miss much.

Sharpton kicked things off by asking Harris about her dismal support among men, particularly black men.

It’s no secret that Harris has struggled with this demographic, so much so that Democrats have dragged out Barack Obama to guilt-trip black men into supporting her.

Earlier this month, Obama basically gave a lecture to the “brothers,” telling them they had to vote for Harris. Well, it backfired spectacularly.

Black men didn’t just ignore Obama’s plea—they blasted him for it.

So what’s the Harris camp’s next genius move? Roll out “White Dudes for Harris.”

Because nothing says relatable like white liberal men trying to convince other men to vote for a vice president who’s been a disaster.

That strategy didn’t just flop—it got roasted by none other than Donald Trump at the Al Smith charity dinner.

“There’s a group called ‘White Dudes for Harris,’” Trump quipped, “but I’m not worried about them at all, because their wives and their wives’ lovers are all voting for me.” Classic Trump.

But let’s get back to Sharpton’s hard-hitting journalism.

He asked Harris if the lack of male support was because of—you guessed it—misogyny.

“Do you think some of the resistance of some men—black and white—is misogynist?”

Sharpton asked, clearly fishing for the usual narrative. Harris’s answer? A predictable word salad that basically boiled down to “yes.” Because in the world of Kamala Harris, if you don’t support her, you must be a misogynist.

It’s never her policies, her incompetence, or her failure to connect with voters—nope, it’s always someone else’s fault.

Kamala Harris Gaslights American Men in Latest Dumpster Fire Interview – Potus Toast

potustoast.com

BJ-

Sharpton and Harris -
Dey be pulling out all da stops.
Seriously though - this is not going to end well for Harris.

Kind of funny that these people are perfectly fine with people voting for a woman solely based on the fact that the person is a woman but people aren't allowed to not vote for someone because she is a woman.

 

[WEATHER53]

And Trump has no problem having affairs and bragging about them.

When he’s unmarried
Willie Brien and others were still married even if “separated”

 

[Billiejeens]

Kind of funny that these people are perfectly fine with people voting for a woman solely based on the fact that the person is a woman but people aren't allowed to not vote for someone because she is a woman.

The Democrats have a huge male voter problem.

The Democrats demean men, other than the "pajama boy" types, constantly decry toxic masculinity,
marginalize them in every way and are stunned that President Trump45/47 has a 70/30 advantage over HarrisNever
in the polling.

 

[WEATHER53]

The Democrats have a huge male voter problem.

The Democrats demean men, other than the "pajama boy" types, constantly decry toxic masculinity,
marginalize them in every way and are stunned that President Trump45/47 has a 70/30 advantage over HarrisNever
in the polling.

Toxic masculinity is another set of made up words that are fake but libs feel sounds sinister and condemning

 

[Independent thinker]

The Democrats have a huge male voter problem.

The Democrats demean men, other than the "pajama boy" types, constantly decry toxic masculinity,
marginalize them in every way and are stunned that President Trump45/47 has a 70/30 advantage over HarrisNever
in the polling.

Yup. They demean men and white people.

 

[22lcidw]

What does justify it? Multiple times?

So, you are saying that men and women are of total equality over men and women that nature has made different. And now artificially we have turned many women into acting like men and emasculated men to a degree that they are on their hind feet with a nation now in decline. Let's have a pamphlet printed up so we know what to do. And that will include not dying for women I would expect.

 

[pknopp]

So, you are saying that men and women are of total equality over men and women that nature has made different. And now artificially we have turned many women into acting like men and emasculated men to a degree that they are on their hind feet with a nation now in decline. Let's have a pamphlet printed up so we know what to do. And that will include not dying for women I would expect.

Since you didn't directly answer I'll try and see what I can get from this. It's OK for someone to cheat as long as they are male?

 

[Edgetho]

Under the Heading --

dimocraps are scum​

Comes this newz,

Pro-Transgenderism-for-Children Partisans Receive $10 Million from Federal Government to Prove Puberty Blockers Help 11-Year-Old Children.​

But Now That the Data Show Children Aren't Helped -- and May Be Hurt -- They Refuse to Publish the Results.​

Via John Sexton.

A radical pro-transgenderism-for-children "researcher" asked the government for around $10 million for a "study." Really, a propaganda effort as we now know.

One single study conducted in the Netherlands claimed that children benefit from being pumped full of sterilizing chemical castration agents.

This claim is widely derided. She wanted to prove that pumping children full of sex-change hormones is good for them.

Well, her study proved that children are not helped by the hormones.

And guess what she did next?

She decided to simply withhold the study that we paid $10 million for, because she doesn't want the study's conclusion to be used against transgender fanatics like herself.

Even the trans-crazy New York Times finds it curious that "science" is now being published or withheld from publication based on the political agenda of the "scientist" involved.

U.S. Study on Puberty Blockers Goes Unpublished Because of Politics, Doctor Says


The leader of the long-running study said that the drugs did not improve mental health in children with gender distress and that the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care.

Posted here because it might be shut down or moved if I started its own thread. My apologies to the OP of this thread