GuyOnInternet
Member
- Mar 4, 2022
- 35
- 29
- 11
We are willing to fly on airplanes even though we do not have absolute certainty that the flight will not crash. We have justified confidence in the fact that in the last couple years, only 1 in 16.7 million flights crashed. The odds are even less for domestic flights that do not travel as far or across the ocean. Is it rational to believe that it is highly unlikely that an individual flight will crash? Is my prediction that the flight will land safely a random guess or an informed decision based on a statistical analysis of past results?
We are willing to trust science when we fly on planes, drive in cars, and go to the doctor. Again, we do this even though we do not have absolute certainty that it will turn out well. We have justified confidence in many of the results of scientific progress. What we really trust is applied science in the form of technology. This would not be the case if the theories and facts it is based on were not extrememly likely to be at least approximately true.
I believe we should hold attempts at social engineering based on social science to the same level of empirical testing, precision, lack of ambiguity and confidence levels as the most well established mechanical engineering before we trust them to be implemented.
We are willing to trust science when we fly on planes, drive in cars, and go to the doctor. Again, we do this even though we do not have absolute certainty that it will turn out well. We have justified confidence in many of the results of scientific progress. What we really trust is applied science in the form of technology. This would not be the case if the theories and facts it is based on were not extrememly likely to be at least approximately true.
I believe we should hold attempts at social engineering based on social science to the same level of empirical testing, precision, lack of ambiguity and confidence levels as the most well established mechanical engineering before we trust them to be implemented.