Just for Clarification.

[Delldude]

What are your suggestions for cases like this

A link

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

What are your suggestions for cases like this

As the rules state, valid links to sources that support the claims/facts named in the opening post.

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

As the rules state, valid links to sources that support the claims/facts named in the opening post.

flag them?

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

flag them?

Report them.

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

A link

Report them.

Delldude take note

 

[Delldude]

Delldude take note

I don't start threads using AI.

Try harder..

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Simply quoting AI is not enough for a valid source.

But we can still reply to CClaytonJones, right?

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

What are your suggestions for cases like this

A link

I don't start threads using AI.

Try harder..

 

[Ropey]

It's when someone uses AI as a general source and don't have any source links that it becomes a problem. AI is alot like Wikipedia in that the info it provides is dependent on what it gathers from users; easy to manipulate to give false information.

+3

 

[Ropey]

I don't start threads using AI.

The definitive response to that little bit of idiocy from Z.

 

[Ropey]

As the rules state, valid links to sources that support the claims/facts named in the opening post.

Report them.

You opened that door.

So, you should expect a surplus of reports from the idiot brigades... on all sides.

I know, you can handle it.

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

You opened that door.

So, you should expect a surplus of reports from the idiot brigades... on all sides.

I know, you can handle it.

and you have the nerve to say

The definitive response to that little bit of idiocy from Z.

 

[Ropey]

and you have the nerve to say

View attachment 1133064

Still, I wasn't addressing you when I said idiots would be hammering the report button. That being said?

I see that you self-identify quite well.

 

[BackAgain]

Some of the AI overviews have links to their sources. It's not any different than using Wikipedia, really. It's just a more elaborate search engine, is all. just depends on the sources they use. Commies and Democrats post links to garbage sites all day every day, so why would AI be any worse? It isn't.

I don’t place much stock in Wiki. But it can nevertheless be used as a quick point of departure. See what it cites. Review that. Then maybe agree if the citations are valid and the thinking is logical. But tear it to shreds otherwise.

 

[Picaro]

I don’t place much stock in Wiki. But it can nevertheless be used as a quick point of departure. See what it cites. Review that. Then maybe agree if the citations are valid and the thinking is logical. But tear it to shreds otherwise.

Wiki articles usually have lists of links at the bottom, as well as links to the discussions of what is in the articles behind the scenes. Sometimes it's just easier to link to the article than bothering with posting 20 links to their sources. The AI overviews also have links embedded in them, too. When dealing with commies and perverts I rarely bother with links, since anybody who is really already informed on a topic never ask for them or need them, and I could care less about demands from vermin and parrots.

Contrary to public opinion, the vast majority of these threads are not debates; the actual Debate Forums are wastelands nobody goes to most of the time, and it's obvious most of the 'Debates' there aren't real debates either. There are reasons why that is, and why 'formal logic' always fails, not that many know why, since few ever bother to take Intro To Logic 102 and learn the differences between 'fallacies' and 'arguments'. 'Formal logic' is itself a logical fallacy, it's circular reasoning, limited to definitions of word meanings. One of the best teaching texts on logic and its weaknesses was written centuries ago, by Thomas of Aquina.

Facts don't need 'debate', they are either facts or they aren't. Morals are the same way.

"You'll never get mixed up if you simply tell the truth. Then you don't have to remember what you have said, and you never forget what you have said."

Sam Rayburn

"Skills can be taught. Character you either have or you don't have."

—Anthony Bourdain

 

[Ropey]

I can easily find facts.

That's about all there is to the best AI with huge search bases. It's really not Artificial Intelligence.

It's more of a Large Language model with extremely fast & massive deep learning modules which means it is dependent on data and let's face it... GIGO sill applies. An idiot using AI will likely produce good sounding... idiocy.

Understanding large language models: A comprehensive guide

Learn about large language models (LLMs) and their applications, and discover how they are shaping technology, from healthcare to entertainment....

www.elastic.co

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[Ropey]

^QED

and let's face it... GIGO sill applies. An idiot using AI will likely produce good sounding... idiocy.

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

I didn't see anyone indicate an interest in doing an experiment so I went ahead and created a separate thread demonstrating how AI is not just a "search engine"

Zone1 - Why AI is Not "Just a Search Engine" and the Garbage, in the Case of "Garbage In Garbage Out" Just Might be Referring to YOUR Input"