Judicial Tyranny Out in the Open in Brian Murphy's Courtroom in Massachusetts

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
28,522
Reaction score
57,693
Points
2,290
A handful of these District Court judges have been slowly, steadily indicating they don't care what the Supreme Court rules.

Boasberg did it slightly more nefariously.

This clown is in open rebellion.

A King on the bench.


 
A handful of these District Court judges have been slowly, steadily indicating they don't care waht the Supreme Court rukes.

Boasberg did it slightly more nefariously.

This clown is in open rebellion.

A King on the bench.



What is he doing that is illegal?
 
A handful of these District Court judges have been slowly, steadily indicating they don't care what the Supreme Court rules.

Boasberg did it slightly more nefariously.

This clown is in open rebellion.

A King on the bench.



Sets a precedent for Trump to begin ignoring USSC.

Y'know..."They've made their ruling, now let's see them enforce it."
 
A handful of these District Court judges have been slowly, steadily indicating they don't care what the Supreme Court rules.

Boasberg did it slightly more nefariously.

This clown is in open rebellion.

A King on the bench.



These Demofuk judges are the kind that have unpleasant accidents while driving home after work!
 
Some information about this King in a dirty black robe.



This is just one of the nutter's Democrats rammed through to sit on our courts.



Excerpts from the letter:


  • Argues to eliminate arrests for many crimes: “The headlines are flooded with violence by police officers against Black citizens at the time of arrest — a flashpoint that could be wholly avoided by changing the rules to require court summonses for all misdemeanors and non-violent offenses. This would not only eliminate arrests for all alleged minor infractions such as using a counterfeit $20 bill to buy cigarettes, as happened to George Floyd, but also for fraught and unnecessary police encounters involving possessory offenses, assault and battery, breaking and entering, and similar offenses.”

  • Accuses police officers of “often” filing false charges to cover for police brutality: Eliminating arrests for most crimes “would not only prevent a majority of the police violence against Black lives, but would dramatically reduce false complaints of resisting arrest and assault and battery on a police officer—charges that are often a smoke screen for police brutality.”

  • Suggests that people of different races are not “peers” before the law: “Rules regarding the composition of the [jury pool] should be amended so that defendants can be tried before peers from their community rather than a county-wide jury that too often lacks racial diversity.”

 
15th post
So a local judge goes against the supreme court, you okay with that? So maybe a conservative judge should stop abortion.
You have not stated what he is doing that is illegal...Hell, Trump defies the Supreme Court, I thought that kind of activity was "in", really "in"...
 
You have not stated what he is doing that is illegal...Hell, Trump defies the Supreme Court, I thought that kind of activity was "in", really "in"...
Supreme Court says Trump can remove illegals and some judge rules against them. You good with that?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom