Judge sets Trump's sentencing in hush money case for Jan. 10, but signals no jail time

Don't forget that history is written by the winners, and the American people have won. The referendum was on November 5th
No, history is written by academics who are in possession of facts.

Maybe spend a little less time in the bumper sticker aisle at the truck stop.
 
"Defendant makes clear that the driving 'compelling factor"' requiring vacatur of the jury's verdict and dismissal of the indictment is "Presidential immunity and the Supremacy Clause." Defendant's Motion at pg.54. Thus, the primary issue before this Court is: whether a President-elect must be afforded the same immunity protections from a state prosecution as a sitting President? This issue, as far as this Court can discern, is without precedent. Although the parties agree on very little, they both appear to recognize the paucity of available precedent to assist this Court in evaluating Presidential immunity in the instant context. Though the parties arrive at starkly different conclusions, they both rely on the same small universe of legal authority to support their respective arguments."

Without precedent cuz never before could a person convicted of felonies be considered a viable candidate for the presidency let alone win.
 
Trump is going to fix the judicial system. Biden broke it
No doubt he'll try to "fix" the judicial system so that he can commit crime with impunity. The guy is a fucking lowlife who was born with larceny running thru his veins.
 
Do not forget EVERYONE.

If you claim your home is worth more than the ASSESSED TAXABLE VALUE from your county, you have committed fraud and should be charged.

So when ever any of you apply for a 2nd or 3rd mortgage or use your home as collateral. DO NOT PUT A VALUE ONE PENNY OVER THE COUNTY ASSESSED TAXABLE VALUE.

None of you will…..right? :spinner: :113:

Read the verdict.


Common Law FraudThe instant action is not a garden-variety common law fraud case. Common law fraud (alsoknown as “misrepresentation”) has five elements: (1) A material statement; (2) falsity; (3)knowledge of the falsity (“scienter”); (4) justifiable reliance; and (5) damages. See, e.g., KerusaCo. LLC v W10Z/515 Real Estate Ltd. Partnership, 12 NY3d 236, 242 (2009) (“[T]he elementsof common law fraud” are “a false representation . . . in relation to a material fact; scienter;reliance; and injury.”). Alleging the elements is easy; proving them is difficult. Is the statementone of fact or opinion? Material according to what standard? Knowledge demonstratedhow? Justifiable subjectively or objectively? In mid-twentieth century New York, to judge bycontemporary press reports and judicial opinions, fraudsters were having a field day.

Plaintiff essentially alleges (1) that the individual defendantsviolated New York Executive Law § 63(12) by submitting false financial statements to banksand insurance companies to obtain better rates on loans and insurance coverage.
 
Do not forget EVERYONE.

If you claim your home is worth more than the ASSESSED TAXABLE VALUE from your county, you have committed fraud and should be charged.

So when ever any of you apply for a 2nd or 3rd mortgage or use your home as collateral. DO NOT PUT A VALUE ONE PENNY OVER THE COUNTY ASSESSED TAXABLE VALUE.

None of you will…..right? :spinner: :113:

Read the verdict.


Common Law FraudThe instant action is not a garden-variety common law fraud case. Common law fraud (alsoknown as “misrepresentation”) has five elements: (1) A material statement; (2) falsity; (3)knowledge of the falsity (“scienter”); (4) justifiable reliance; and (5) damages. See, e.g., KerusaCo. LLC v W10Z/515 Real Estate Ltd. Partnership, 12 NY3d 236, 242 (2009) (“[T]he elementsof common law fraud” are “a false representation . . . in relation to a material fact; scienter;reliance; and injury.”). Alleging the elements is easy; proving them is difficult. Is the statementone of fact or opinion? Material according to what standard? Knowledge demonstratedhow? Justifiable subjectively or objectively? In mid-twentieth century New York, to judge bycontemporary press reports and judicial opinions, fraudsters were having a field day.

Plaintiff essentially alleges (1) that the individual defendantsviolated New York Executive Law § 63(12) by submitting false financial statements to banksand insurance companies to obtain better rates on loans and insurance coverage.
Completely irrelevant to the decades of criminal fraud by the fat rapist charity thief.
 
Completely irrelevant to the decades of criminal fraud by the fat rapist charity thief.

This frivolous fraud case is good because you claim he has broken lots of other laws?

HMMMMMMM

I understand you can NAZI how fucking retarded that is.
 
Sure, the conviction can be overturned.
And then what? Order a new trial?

If the Appeals court says Trump did not receive a fair trial, their normal action would be to reverse and send it back to the lower court for a do-over.
 
Anyone with basic knowledges of the rule of law knows this
Translation:

Not the judge or the jury or the grand jury or the prosecutors. They din't know anything about the law.

Just Dan Bogino and whatever idiotic things dribble from his idiot mouth
 
“To dismiss the indictment and set aside the jury verdict would not serve the concerns set forth by the Supreme Court in its handful of cases addressing presidential immunity nor would it serve the rule of law,” Justice Merchan wrote in the Friday ruling. “On the contrary, such decision would undermine the rule of law in immeasurable ways.”

Spot on.
 
And then what? Order a new trial?

If the Appeals court says Trump did not receive a fair trial, their normal action would be to reverse and send it back to the lower court for a do-over.
I think they are likely gonna argue a number of issues but one would be sufficient evidence. If the court grants on that, they can dismiss the indictment
 
Merchon desperately wants OFF this Merry Go Round! He knows the lawfare didn't work. He also knows his ruling is going to be tossed on appeal. Juan just waved the white flag.

He sure did. Trump doesn't even have to appear in his court anymore. :laughing0301:


 
No, history is written by academics who are in possession of facts.

Maybe spend a little less time in the bumper sticker aisle at the truck stop.
And history will show the dishonesty of the current regime in charge in Washington. Thanks for your unintelligent little blurb though
 
No doubt he'll try to "fix" the judicial system so that he can commit crime with impunity. The guy is a fucking lowlife who was born with larceny running thru his veins.
You are a fucking low life.
 
Who gives a shit? This isn't going to protect this fake judge from being sued for the malicious fake persecution of President Trump or having to compensate Trump for his expenses he incurred. The crazy part is that since his campaign paid the lawyers, Merchan and DA Bragg are going to have to pay money to defeat liberalism.
 
Back
Top Bottom