Jeffrey Epstein found injured in New York jail cell

[Frannie]

Stay tuned because Trump is being impeached today right or wrong

Well, this is news to me and the world, Frannie.
Trump is being impeached? So the handful of dems convinced their party and the republican
party to impeach Trump? my, my you have been listening to MSNBC and CNN for too long, apparently.
Now you can just make up shit and pass it on as fact.

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

This is not true. The House can certainly impeach a President , has nothing to do with the Senate. They merely convict or not if the House impeaches.

Do they have the votes in the House, Hmmmmm? Not from what I'm hearing

They already voted and failed

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

WoW! This might be the craziest thread I've started! I'm totally surprised the Mods have not moved it straight to the conspiracy forum! If not the rubber Room.

Clinton Hit-men..Trump Hit-men..You are all utterly insane! Cloud cuckoo land.

This dude...Epstein..faked a suicide attempt..in an effort to get some leverage..it happens all the time in Prison and is why the prison authorities make it so unpleasant for an inmate when this happens. Simple as that..it happens every day in the system. But out come the loonies..I have to ask you all..what is it about sex offenders that excites you so?
Both sides of the political spectrum salivate whenever pedophilia is mentioned--and all these so-called secrets Epstein is supposed to be privy to..do you really think that anyone of note would vouchsafe anything to a sex addict millionaire? Both Clinton and Trump..and about a hundred whores..err..politicians... put up with Epstein for his money....and when he got caught..they ran like roaches in the light..but there are no secrets...no Pedophile ring...in fact, not that it matters to the loony tunes here..importing young teens for sex is horrible...and beyond the pale..and i hope Epstein does not see the light of day ever again..but it is NOT Pedophilia---and all your yammering does not change that fact.

None of the girls that Epstein is accused of using for sex was prepubescent..and that..my tinfoil-hatted friends..is the definition of Pedophilia. Why is this important..or even relevant? Because when you broaden the definition to include statutory offenses you diminish the impact and insult the true victims.

But hey..as we all know...you will continue with your obsessive fascination with the subject and your mislabeling and wild accusations....in pursuit of your crazy theories and pathetic attempts to demonize the other side.

The Neurobiology and Psychology of Pedophilia: Recent Advances and Challenges

"Pedophilia is defined as an ongoing sexual attraction toward pre-pubertal children (Freund, 1963, 1967; Seto, 2009). In the new DSM-5, pedophilia is de-pathologized by differentiating between the sexual preference for prepubescent children (i.e., pedophilia) and the disorder in case of additional factors. These factors include experiencing significant distress and impairment by fantasies and urges, or the acting out on behavioral level, including child pornography consumption and/or committing hands-on CSA offenses.
Table 1
Diagnostic criteria of a pedophilic disorder according to DSM-5.

DSM-5 pedophilic disorder
Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger) Specify if:
Sexually attracted to males
Sexually attracted to females
Sexually attracted to both
The fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning Specify if:
Limited to Incest
The person is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A Specify type:
Exclusive type (attracted only to children)
Non-exclusive type

 

[Erinwltr]

Neither child molesters nor former cops have it easy in prison.

True enough.

But homosexuals really like being in the joint. All those naked men in the shower and all of the sodomy going on. Plenty of straight guys to try and recruit.

No. Such Trolling BS.
Since you know a lot about incarcerated homosexual men, pp. Enlighten me about straight dudes being recruited into Homosexuality.

 

[Rustic]

Bill Clinton is probably trying to shut him up.

More likely Trump. All Espstein has to do is confirm that woman's claim Trump raped here when she was 13.
Too any rich people want him dead.

But who has the authority to hush his documents????

Lol
You’re confused, you’re thinking of slick Willy you fucking retard

 

[Polishprince]

Neither child molesters nor former cops have it easy in prison.

True enough.

But homosexuals really like being in the joint. All those naked men in the shower and all of the sodomy going on. Plenty of straight guys to try and recruit.

No. Such Trolling BS.
Since you know a lot about incarcerated homosexual men, pp. Enlighten me about straight dudes being recruited into Homosexuality.

A friend of mine was serving time in Maryland and he was in his cell. A couple of gay inmates tried to forcibly recruit him into the orientation. Of course he fought for his manhood and is still straight.

He was fortunate that he was pretty tough, otherwise, he might have been turned gay.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Neither child molesters nor former cops have it easy in prison.

True enough.

But homosexuals really like being in the joint. All those naked men in the shower and all of the sodomy going on. Plenty of straight guys to try and recruit.

No. Such Trolling BS.
Since you know a lot about incarcerated homosexual men, pp. Enlighten me about straight dudes being recruited into Homosexuality.

A friend of mine was serving time in Maryland and he was in his cell. A couple of gay inmates tried to forcibly recruit him into the orientation. Of course he fought for his manhood and is still straight.

He was fortunate that he was pretty tough, otherwise, he might have been turned gay.

Turned gay? Is that a thing? How does that work/ Is gay sex so great that once having been raped...you forsake all women?

Can someone 'fight for their manhood' and lose? Are you saying that if a man is raped he's lost his manhood?

 

[Aletheia4u]

The Secret History Of Jeffery Epstein Your Not Supposed To Know

Shocking Details Of Jeffery Epstein Alleged Suicide Attempt in Jail

 

[ButterNutter]

Stay tuned because Trump is being impeached today right or wrong

Well, this is news to me and the world, Frannie.
Trump is being impeached? So the handful of dems convinced their party and the republican
party to impeach Trump? my, my you have been listening to MSNBC and CNN for too long, apparently.
Now you can just make up shit and pass it on as fact.

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

This is not true. The House can certainly impeach a President , has nothing to do with the Senate. They merely convict or not if the House impeaches.

Do they have the votes in the House, Hmmmmm? Not from what I'm hearing

No , of course they don't. And even the morons like Al Green don't REALLY want to impeach Trump. They simply want to keep this going to further smear him.

Nancy Pelosi could EASILY stop this if she wanted to , but she doesn't want to. I don't care what she says , she is behind all this BS

I was merely pointing out that factually the House impeaches, the Senate votes on conviction, you most certainly don't need the Senate to impeach.

 

[Frannie]

Well, this is news to me and the world, Frannie.
Trump is being impeached? So the handful of dems convinced their party and the republican
party to impeach Trump? my, my you have been listening to MSNBC and CNN for too long, apparently.
Now you can just make up shit and pass it on as fact.

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

This is not true. The House can certainly impeach a President , has nothing to do with the Senate. They merely convict or not if the House impeaches.

Do they have the votes in the House, Hmmmmm? Not from what I'm hearing

No , of course they don't. And even the morons like Al Green don't REALLY want to impeach Trump. They simply want to keep this going to further smear him.

Nancy Pelosi could EASILY stop this if she wanted to , but she doesn't want to. I don't care what she says , she is behind all this BS

I was merely pointing out that factually the House impeaches, the Senate votes on conviction, you most certainly don't need the Senate to impeach.

Green really wants Trump impeached as green has no good ideas of his own

 

[ButterNutter]

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

This is not true. The House can certainly impeach a President , has nothing to do with the Senate. They merely convict or not if the House impeaches.

Do they have the votes in the House, Hmmmmm? Not from what I'm hearing

No , of course they don't. And even the morons like Al Green don't REALLY want to impeach Trump. They simply want to keep this going to further smear him.

Nancy Pelosi could EASILY stop this if she wanted to , but she doesn't want to. I don't care what she says , she is behind all this BS

I was merely pointing out that factually the House impeaches, the Senate votes on conviction, you most certainly don't need the Senate to impeach.

Green really wants Trump impeached as green has no good ideas of his own

No he doesn't . The Dems have fooled you as well as everyone else. Green is a dumb son of a bitch , but even he know the truth. Trump hasn't committed an impeachable offense. And further he knew going in that his impeachment resolution would not pass. He is what is known as a useful idiot.

If Nancy Pelosi TRULY believed that Trump had committed impeachable offenses , she could and would FORCE enough Democrats in the House to impeach . She's not as powerless as the squad would make us believe she is. And likewise if she really thought impeachment talks were bad for the country , she could and would silence Al Green and his idiotic band.

ALL Democrats care about is getting and keeping power, NEVER forget that.

 

[Frannie]

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

This is not true. The House can certainly impeach a President , has nothing to do with the Senate. They merely convict or not if the House impeaches.

Do they have the votes in the House, Hmmmmm? Not from what I'm hearing

No , of course they don't. And even the morons like Al Green don't REALLY want to impeach Trump. They simply want to keep this going to further smear him.

Nancy Pelosi could EASILY stop this if she wanted to , but she doesn't want to. I don't care what she says , she is behind all this BS

I was merely pointing out that factually the House impeaches, the Senate votes on conviction, you most certainly don't need the Senate to impeach.

Green really wants Trump impeached as green has no good ideas of his own

No he doesn't . The Dems have fooled you as well as everyone else. Green is a dumb son of a bitch , but even he know the truth. Trump hasn't committed an impeachable offense. And further he knew going in that his impeachment resolution would not pass. He is what is known as a useful idiot.

If Nancy Pelosi TRULY believed that Trump had committed impeachable offenses , she could and would FORCE enough Democrats in the House to impeach . She's not as powerless as the squad would make us believe she is. And likewise if she really thought impeachment talks were bad for the country , she could and would silence Al Green and his idiotic band.

ALL Democrats care about is getting and keeping power, NEVER forget that.

All the dems want trump impeached because pence is beatable trump is not

 

[playtime]

Either an attempt at manipulation...or someone trying to administer jailhouse justice:

Jeffrey Epstein found injured in New York jail cell

"Jeffrey Epstein, the millionaire financier who is being held on federal sex trafficking charges, was found injured and in a fetal position in his cell at a New York City jail, sources close to the investigation told NBC News on Wednesday night.
Epstein, 66, was found semi-conscious with marks on his neck in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan some time in the last two days, the sources said. Epstein is on suicide watch, two sources said.
Two sources told NBC News that Epstein may have tried to hang himself, while a third source cautioned that the injuries weren't serious, questioning whether Epstein might have staged an attack or a suicide attempt to get a transfer to another facility."

The first things cons want to know is what you are in for. They do not take kindly to child molesters. Worse, I'm sure the Clintons have plenty of contacts on the inside. Jeff is screwed.

I suspect tramp had him roughed up to shut him up. The Clintons do not have the pull like tramp has.

Yeah.....sure.....and Trump wants the list of names that include many of his accusers to disappear too.

summer zervos ain't goin' away, lenny.................

 

[playtime]

Either an attempt at manipulation...or someone trying to administer jailhouse justice:

Jeffrey Epstein found injured in New York jail cell

"Jeffrey Epstein, the millionaire financier who is being held on federal sex trafficking charges, was found injured and in a fetal position in his cell at a New York City jail, sources close to the investigation told NBC News on Wednesday night.
Epstein, 66, was found semi-conscious with marks on his neck in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan some time in the last two days, the sources said. Epstein is on suicide watch, two sources said.
Two sources told NBC News that Epstein may have tried to hang himself, while a third source cautioned that the injuries weren't serious, questioning whether Epstein might have staged an attack or a suicide attempt to get a transfer to another facility."

Well, Lorraine....I mean Jeffery better get used to that kind of treatment.

What treatment he was in solitary

Good point. Michael Cohen is lower on the Prison Food Chain than Mr. Epstein and hasn't been attacked.

I think the Clintons are sending Eppy a message.


The Tombs , BTW, are a local New York facility not a federal facility.

IMHO, the DOJ should transport Mr. Cohen to Cobb County GA or some more friendly jurisdiction where they can better keep him around for the trial and if he wants to turn state's evidence.

The only reason eppy was arrested is because the dems found a photo of him and trump

There is no states evidence

Evidence against financier Epstein is growing, federal prosecutors say
Nation Jul 15, 2019 8:06 AM EDT



[...]
In addition to the charges in the indictment, prosecutors are also reviewing dozens of electronic files seized during a raid on Epstein’s residence after his July 6 arrest, finding even more photos than the hundreds or thousands of pictures of nude and seminude young women and girls they had reported prior to a court hearing a week ago.
[...]

Evidence against financier Epstein is growing, federal prosecutors say

names are being exposed.................

Epstein case: Feds also investigating ‘uncharged individuals’
By Andrew Denney and Bruce Golding

July 25, 2019 | 6:05pm | Updated
[...]
Manhattan federal prosecutors are conducting an “ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals” connected to Jeffrey Epstein, according to court papers filed Thursday.

The probe was revealed in a court filing that seeks to ensure that evidence in the case against Epstein remains secret.

Prosecutors said they planned to give lawyers for the convicted pedophile “certain documents and materials” containing both “confidential” and “highly confidential” information that shouldn’t be made public.

But they asked Manhattan federal Judge Richard Berman to first endorse a nine-page order prohibiting the lawyers from sharing the information with anyone not directly involved in Epstein’s case.

The reasons include the possibility that releasing it “would impede, if prematurely disclosed, the Government’s ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals,” according to the Manhattan federal court filing.

None of those people were identified.

The “highly confidential” information “contains images of nude or partially-nude individuals” that will only be made available to the defense “under the protection of law enforcement officers or employees,” according to court papers.

Prosecutors have said that investigators seized a massive trove of photos of nude photos – including of at least one girl who was underage at the time – during a raid on Epstein’s $77 million Upper East Side townhouse.
[...]

https://nypost.com/2019/07/25/epstein-case-feds-also-investigating-uncharged-individuals/

 

[playtime]

There are no new charges this was settled long ago. They arrested him because there is a photo of him with trump

Stay tuned

Stay tuned because Trump is being impeached today right or wrong

Well, this is news to me and the world, Frannie.
Trump is being impeached? So the handful of dems convinced their party and the republican
party to impeach Trump? my, my you have been listening to MSNBC and CNN for too long, apparently.
Now you can just make up shit and pass it on as fact.

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

the senate has no input whether the house can impeach. first the house judiciary committee votes to open an impeachment inquiry, which means they get all the grand jury information, - which are the unredacted names & accompanying evidence. (they could have it all already, but barr is refusing to ask the grand jury to give it to them) so an inquiry must happen. articles of impeachment are then drawn up.

if it passes in the committee, , then it's open to the floor & then if it's a go- the public will be viewing it on TV every day.... all the people involved, what they did, where, when & how will be exposed. & once impeachment is over, then it goes to the senate for trial... or not.... the trial for removal is the senates job.

 

[playtime]

Stay tuned because Trump is being impeached today right or wrong

Well, this is news to me and the world, Frannie.
Trump is being impeached? So the handful of dems convinced their party and the republican
party to impeach Trump? my, my you have been listening to MSNBC and CNN for too long, apparently.
Now you can just make up shit and pass it on as fact.

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

This is not true. The House can certainly impeach a President , has nothing to do with the Senate. They merely convict or not if the House impeaches.

Do they have the votes in the House, Hmmmmm? Not from what I'm hearing

not yet.... but 5 more just signed on yesterday... when they go back home to their constituents, they may get a better idea of the pulse.

 

[playtime]

Well, this is news to me and the world, Frannie.
Trump is being impeached? So the handful of dems convinced their party and the republican
party to impeach Trump? my, my you have been listening to MSNBC and CNN for too long, apparently.
Now you can just make up shit and pass it on as fact.

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

This is not true. The House can certainly impeach a President , has nothing to do with the Senate. They merely convict or not if the House impeaches.

Do they have the votes in the House, Hmmmmm? Not from what I'm hearing

They already voted and failed

they voted but it wasn't gonna proceed because not everyone is on board without hard core evidence, & that can only be revealed if bill barr petitions the court to allow the confidential materials be handed over to the judiciary committee & the other congress critters with the highest level of security or an official inquiry is brought forth. if the latter happens, then bill barr has zero chance of stopping it & ANYBODY that then refuses to appear b4 congress WILL be jailed. traitor tot, kushner, mcgahn, lewindowski & the house pump-hope hicks must comply, along with anybody else.

 

[ButterNutter]

Stay tuned

Stay tuned because Trump is being impeached today right or wrong

Well, this is news to me and the world, Frannie.
Trump is being impeached? So the handful of dems convinced their party and the republican
party to impeach Trump? my, my you have been listening to MSNBC and CNN for too long, apparently.
Now you can just make up shit and pass it on as fact.

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

the senate has no input whether the house can impeach. first the house judiciary committee votes to open an impeachment inquiry, which means they get all the grand jury information, - which are the unredacted names & accompanying evidence. (they could have it all already, but barr is refusing to ask the grand jury to give it to them) so an inquiry must happen. articles of impeachment are then drawn up.

if it passes in the committee, , then it's open to the floor & then if it's a go- the public will be viewing it on TV every day.... all the people involved, what they did, where, when & how will be exposed. & once impeachment is over, then it goes to the senate for trial... or not.... the trial for removal is the senates job.

A small correction sir. The House Judiciary Comittee has had access to the ENTIRE unredacted Mueller report since May, since May and not one of the Democrats on the Committee , not even the fucking Chairman of the Judiciary Jerry Nadler has bothered to show up and look at the damn thing.

Why do you think that is? Oh that's right it's because they know that the 6% of the report that is redacted wouldn't provide them with a god damned thing, but they are too dishonest to go look at it and just tell the American people "we have seen the entire report, including the redacted material and there is nothing there that indicates the President violated the law" so instead they rely on idiotic voters such as yourself to buy it when they say "Barr won't give us the FULL report, and that redacted part, that's redacted to protect Trump"

This is 100% fact my man, not one Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, NOR the Intelligence Committee has got off their fat ass and went 2 blocks over to view the entire unredacted report in a secure environment

The reason that Barr hasn't just released the entire document to Congress without them having to go to a SCIF at the Justice Department is clear. The moment it gets their at least one of the scumbags will leak the entire thing , including grand jury material and other classified information. Do you think Jerry Nadler would even hesitate to burn someone in our intelligence communities cover in order to embarrass Trump? Hell no , he wouldn't.

Some of you Democrat voters HAVE to stop letting your outright hatred of Trump cloud your judgement. What I have just told you is factual. If Jerry Nadler or Adam Schiff truly cared what the full unredacted report said they have had access to it since mid May and could have seen it at any point since then but have not. There are zero explanations for this except that they already know they won't find anything in it.

 

[Frannie]

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

This is not true. The House can certainly impeach a President , has nothing to do with the Senate. They merely convict or not if the House impeaches.

Do they have the votes in the House, Hmmmmm? Not from what I'm hearing

They already voted and failed

they voted but it wasn't gonna proceed because not everyone is on board without hard core evidence, & that can only be revealed if bill barr petitions the court to allow the confidential materials be handed over to the judiciary committee & the other congress critters with the highest level of security or an official inquiry is brought forth. if the latter happens, then bill barr has zero chance of stopping it & ANYBODY that then refuses to appear b4 congress WILL be jailed. traitor tot, kushner, mcgahn, lewindowski & the house pump-hope hicks must comply, along with anybody else.

Tell me again that Trump cant win

 

[westwall]

Either an attempt at manipulation...or someone trying to administer jailhouse justice:

Jeffrey Epstein found injured in New York jail cell

"Jeffrey Epstein, the millionaire financier who is being held on federal sex trafficking charges, was found injured and in a fetal position in his cell at a New York City jail, sources close to the investigation told NBC News on Wednesday night.
Epstein, 66, was found semi-conscious with marks on his neck in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan some time in the last two days, the sources said. Epstein is on suicide watch, two sources said.
Two sources told NBC News that Epstein may have tried to hang himself, while a third source cautioned that the injuries weren't serious, questioning whether Epstein might have staged an attack or a suicide attempt to get a transfer to another facility."

Well, Lorraine....I mean Jeffery better get used to that kind of treatment.

What treatment he was in solitary

Good point. Michael Cohen is lower on the Prison Food Chain than Mr. Epstein and hasn't been attacked.

I think the Clintons are sending Eppy a message.


The Tombs , BTW, are a local New York facility not a federal facility.

IMHO, the DOJ should transport Mr. Cohen to Cobb County GA or some more friendly jurisdiction where they can better keep him around for the trial and if he wants to turn state's evidence.

The only reason eppy was arrested is because the dems found a photo of him and trump

There is no states evidence

Evidence against financier Epstein is growing, federal prosecutors say
Nation Jul 15, 2019 8:06 AM EDT



[...]
In addition to the charges in the indictment, prosecutors are also reviewing dozens of electronic files seized during a raid on Epstein’s residence after his July 6 arrest, finding even more photos than the hundreds or thousands of pictures of nude and seminude young women and girls they had reported prior to a court hearing a week ago.
[...]

Evidence against financier Epstein is growing, federal prosecutors say

names are being exposed.................

Epstein case: Feds also investigating ‘uncharged individuals’
By Andrew Denney and Bruce Golding

July 25, 2019 | 6:05pm | Updated
[...]
Manhattan federal prosecutors are conducting an “ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals” connected to Jeffrey Epstein, according to court papers filed Thursday.

The probe was revealed in a court filing that seeks to ensure that evidence in the case against Epstein remains secret.

Prosecutors said they planned to give lawyers for the convicted pedophile “certain documents and materials” containing both “confidential” and “highly confidential” information that shouldn’t be made public.

But they asked Manhattan federal Judge Richard Berman to first endorse a nine-page order prohibiting the lawyers from sharing the information with anyone not directly involved in Epstein’s case.

The reasons include the possibility that releasing it “would impede, if prematurely disclosed, the Government’s ongoing investigation of uncharged individuals,” according to the Manhattan federal court filing.

None of those people were identified.

The “highly confidential” information “contains images of nude or partially-nude individuals” that will only be made available to the defense “under the protection of law enforcement officers or employees,” according to court papers.

Prosecutors have said that investigators seized a massive trove of photos of nude photos – including of at least one girl who was underage at the time – during a raid on Epstein’s $77 million Upper East Side townhouse.
[...]

https://nypost.com/2019/07/25/epstein-case-feds-also-investigating-uncharged-individuals/

Good! i hope they release these names soon, and arrest the pricks.

 

[Frannie]

Stay tuned because Trump is being impeached today right or wrong

Well, this is news to me and the world, Frannie.
Trump is being impeached? So the handful of dems convinced their party and the republican
party to impeach Trump? my, my you have been listening to MSNBC and CNN for too long, apparently.
Now you can just make up shit and pass it on as fact.

You are braindead so I will explain it. Muller testified yesterday and as a result the dems are impeaching now. Or sarcasm is over the morons beak

You are ahead of yourself.....the dems cannot impeach the president without the consent of the Senate.
Now if you had stated that they are bringing impeachment proceedings to a vote, you may have had something.
In other words, they are not impeaching the president.
They don't even have the votes in their own party to do so, IMO.

the senate has no input whether the house can impeach. first the house judiciary committee votes to open an impeachment inquiry, which means they get all the grand jury information, - which are the unredacted names & accompanying evidence. (they could have it all already, but barr is refusing to ask the grand jury to give it to them) so an inquiry must happen. articles of impeachment are then drawn up.

if it passes in the committee, , then it's open to the floor & then if it's a go- the public will be viewing it on TV every day.... all the people involved, what they did, where, when & how will be exposed. & once impeachment is over, then it goes to the senate for trial... or not.... the trial for removal is the senates job.

A small correction sir. The House Judiciary Comittee has had access to the ENTIRE unredacted Mueller report since May, since May and not one of the Democrats on the Committee , not even the fucking Chairman of the Judiciary Jerry Nadler has bothered to show up and look at the damn thing.

Why do you think that is? Oh that's right it's because they know that the 6% of the report that is redacted wouldn't provide them with a god damned thing, but they are too dishonest to go look at it and just tell the American people "we have seen the entire report, including the redacted material and there is nothing there that indicates the President violated the law" so instead they rely on idiotic voters such as yourself to buy it when they say "Barr won't give us the FULL report, and that redacted part, that's redacted to protect Trump"

This is 100% fact my man, not one Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, NOR the Intelligence Committee has got off their fat ass and went 2 blocks over to view the entire unredacted report in a secure environment

The reason that Barr hasn't just released the entire document to Congress without them having to go to a SCIF at the Justice Department is clear. The moment it gets their at least one of the scumbags will leak the entire thing , including grand jury material and other classified information. Do you think Jerry Nadler would even hesitate to burn someone in our intelligence communities cover in order to embarrass Trump? Hell no , he wouldn't.

Some of you Democrat voters HAVE to stop letting your outright hatred of Trump cloud your judgement. What I have just told you is factual. If Jerry Nadler or Adam Schiff truly cared what the full unredacted report said they have had access to it since mid May and could have seen it at any point since then but have not. There are zero explanations for this except that they already know they won't find anything in it.

Congress is going to be running from the Muller report soon enough