It's Time For Rudy to Pay Up!

[BackAgain]

A smaller judgement would not give rudy any reason to think about what he had done next time. I'm pretty sure he will consider the consequences before he does the same thing again.

Nonsense.

 

[BULLDOG]

Nonsense.

You think rudy will defame more people without forethought? That would be really stupid. He might do just that.

 

[BackAgain]

You think rudy will defame more people without forethought? That would be really stupid. He might do just that.

You think he actually defamed anybody? Plus, even if he did, do you truly believe the damages awarded have anything to do with any “harm” actually caused?

That’s absurd.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You think he actually defamed anybody?

We don't have to think or guess.

It's now a fact in the public record.

 

[BULLDOG]

You think he actually defamed anybody? Plus, even if he did, do you truly believe the damages awarded have anything to do with any “harm” actually caused?

That’s absurd.

Yes, I do. However, my opinion doesn't count any more than yours. That means zero effect on the outcome for either you or me. The courts made that decision.

 

[BackAgain]

We don't have to think or guess.

It's now a fact in the public record.

No. It’s just a civil court verdict. And it is likely to get tossed on appeal.

 

[BULLDOG]

No. It’s just a civil court verdict. And it is likely to get tossed on appeal.

And that will be determined by the courts.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes, I do. However, my opinion doesn't count any more than yours. That means zero effect on the outcome for either you or me. The courts made that decision.

A civil jury in a NYC kangaroo court rendered an absurd verdict and the damages awarded were obscene and malicious. Basic lawfare.

 

[BackAgain]

And that will be determined by the courts.

I’m so happy you finally figured something out. Yes. By the courts. As we all already know.

So, you make a dull pointless.

 

[BULLDOG]

A civil jury in a NYC kangaroo court rendered an absurd verdict and the damages awarded were obscene and malicious. Basic lawfare.

You are entitled to your opinion. The courts are charged with finding fact. They said it is a fact that his actions deserved that judgement.

 

[BackAgain]

You are entitled to your opinion. The courts are charged with finding fact. They said it is a fact that his actions deserved that judgement.

That’s why we have an appellate process.

But again, thanks for sharing what we all already know.

 

[OKTexas]

I suppose all that might be true, but more likely it is exactly as it looks. Rudy defamed a couple of innocent women, and it came back to bite him in the ass.

Nope, it's about the persecution of political opponents and the chilling of speech. Everyone saw the video, naturally there was different interpretations and opinions of it. Expressing an opinion on a public event isn't defamation, it's political speech and protected by the first amendment. If it's not, criticizing anyone involved in the election process would open everyone to to the same liability. Those women were public employees, and as such are open to having their actions judged by everyone.

.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It’s just a civil court verdict.

I.E., a fact in the public record. Go check.

 

[BULLDOG]

Nope, it's about the persecution of political opponents and the chilling of speech. Everyone saw the video, naturally there was different interpretations and opinions of it. Expressing an opinion on a public event isn't defamation, it's political speech and protected by the first amendment. If it's not, criticizing anyone involved in the election process would open everyone to to the same liability. Those women were public employees, and as such are open to having their actions judged by everyone.

.

I'm sure rudy will repeat that same little speech to himself every night when he goes to bed in his 10 by 40 trailer house.

 

[my2¢]

I sort of feel sorry for Rudy in that I wouldn't be surprised if he was suffering from a form of dementia when he first started getting involved in the situation.

 

[BULLDOG]

I sort of feel sorry for Rudy in that I wouldn't be surprised if he was suffering from a form of dementia when he first started getting involved in the situation.

I considered that, but any feelings of compassion for rudy were overcome by just how much fun it would be to poke him with a stick.

 

[BackAgain]

I.E., a fact in the public record. Go check.

It is a fact that it is just a verdict from a civil court.

Check that.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It is a fact that it is just a verdict from a civil court.

And is an adjudicated fact in the public record.

Tell Rudy about "it was just a civil judgment". Heh heh

 

[BackAgain]

And is an adjudicated fact in the public record.

You keep saying that as though it’s meaningful. It isn’t.

Put civil aside for a second. Let’s make it criminal. Some guy gets accused of having notoriously committed a murder. He is arrested, indicted, tried and convicted with a huge ass sentence ending in the phrase ”to life.”

According to you, Farty, it is an adjudicated “fact” that he is a murderer.

You’re wrong. It is adjudicated — and the law acts upon that verdict. But, it doesn’t mean that he did it. There are plenty of verified news stories about convicted killers later being scientifically proved to not be the murderer.

A fact stands independent of a jury’s verdict. And an adjudication doesn’t actually make the convicted person a killer (especially when the actual killer was never even caught).

Tell Rudy about "it was just a civil judgment". Heh heh

I don’t provide commentary to Rudy. You idiot. I just like exposing you as the tard you are. It ain’t much. But you deserve the derision.

In a true justice system, Rudy may yet prevail on appeal (at least as to the clearly deranged “damages” awarded).

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You keep saying that as though it’s meaningful. It isn’t.

*to you.

We heard you the first 987 times.

Meanwhile, normal people can quite safely and accurately call him a rapist charity thief felon.