It's Official. No Obama nominee

[bodecea]

Who the hell is Chief Justice Alito?

My bad, I apologize. I should have typed "Associate Justice".

Error on my part.


>>>>

Your thought process a little fucked up today?
Parse words all ******* day.
The FACT is Obama acted like an asshole from the day he took office.
How many of his grand 'pen and phone' EO's were struck down by the courts?
The REP Senate was duly elected to prevent such an asshole quasi-Socialist banana republic style dictator from destroying America. IT WORKED!!!!!
I guess some of that 'African method' of how to run a country worn off on him back in Kenya.
Now Obama can sit in his Oval office with the lights turned down and pick his ******* toes until Trump is inaugurated. Some 'legacy'. But then what did anyone expect when the ******* 'OJ jury' elected the First AA President'? Then Obama can do what he really wants to.
Move into the apartment above Boystown.

Sounds like you need a nap and a cookie.

 

[bodecea]

Recess appointments are moot in this case.
The Senate isn't going to go into recess.
The REP controlled Senate has officially notified the ******* WORLD!! that they will not even open the envelope sent to them with Obama's nomination in it. EVER!
Obama will already be living above Boystown when Trump and his majority Senate choose the next REP SCJ.

The Libs are melting down because The Messiah isn't getting his way.

They're so desperate that they're using the race card...lol

Who is this "Messiah" the RW keeps toting?

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Recess appointments are moot in this case.
The Senate isn't going to go into recess.
The REP controlled Senate has officially notified the ******* WORLD!! that they will not even open the envelope sent to them with Obama's nomination in it. EVER!
Obama will already be living above Boystown when Trump and his majority Senate choose the next REP SCJ.

The Libs are melting down because The Messiah isn't getting his way.

They're so desperate that they're using the race card...lol

Who is this "Messiah" the RW keeps toting?

Obama, your Füerher...that's who.

 

[Dale Smith]

Looks to me that Scalia was murdered. No autopsy and he was cremated (which is very odd as he was a devoted Catholic) before people could start asking questions. One of the most important people in USA.INC and no one takes due diligence to make sure that everything was legit? It smells like shit to me. Kill off an aging justice that has been a thorn in your side and the NWO agenda so you can appoint one that is more "globalist" friendly...but move along, folks...nothing to see here. People need to wake the **** up as to what is going on around them. I wish that people would stop waving their republicon and demcrat flags because they are both the same at the top and all owned by the banking oligarchs that own them "lock, stock and barrel".

 

[WorldWatcher]

How about you go ask the President of the Stanford Law School his opinion about the legal meaning of Section 2 is.Then get back to us OK?

Please show us where the President of the Standford Law School says that it takes a 2/3rds majority of the Senate to approve a Supreme Court Justice.

Then explain how Associate Justice Alito was confirmed with a vote of 58-42. There are 100 Senators so 2/3rds would be 66.66 or 67 as a minimum voting to confirm and he didn't get that many votes.

>>>>

Ever heard of a SC nomination Senate 'filibuster? Do you understand the concept of a 60 member Senate 'Supermajority'?
You ought go back and do some further research on the subject pal. Then come back OK?

1. You still haven't shown where the President of the Standford Law Schools says it takes a 2/3rds majority to consent to a nomination.

2. A filibuster as a measure to prevent a vote in the question before the Senate, it is not vote on the question itself. (Seriously do you even know how the Senate works?)

3. You claim it takes a 2/3rds majority for the Senate to confirm a nominee, but refuse to answer "how did Justice Alito get confirmed with a 52-48 Senate vote?" which is not 2/3rds of the Senate.



>>>>

 

[Faun]

And he ***** up again.

The 2010 midterms were the biggest upset in 60 years, favoring the Republicans.

You said: "Republicans have owned Congress, ever since Obama got elected"

Are forgetting 2008 -2010 -- When House and Senate were Democrat?
From 2010 to 2013 - The Dems still owned the Senate?
From 2013 to Jan 2015 - The Dems still owned the Senate?

I'm guessing you are....unless you have a different definition of *owned congress* that doesn't include the Senate, and another one that revises *since Obama got elected.*

Obama wasn't President in 2008. And, you call me stupid?...lol

I didn't say he was president in 2008, I said from 2008 -2010 -- When House and Senate were Democrat.

Any dumbfuck knows that was the election year, and Dems had all of Congress those first two years (and the prior two years too!) -- and your stupid statement: "Republicans have owned Congress, ever since Obama got elected" is stoopid.

By the same token, the Democrats didn't have a majority in Congress in 2011.

Anyone who doesn't get that, is equally stoopid...yes?

Didn't you say, "since Obama was elected?" Why yes, yes you did. Have someone explain to you that Obama was not elected in 2010.

 

[Faun]

How about you go ask the President of the Stanford Law School his opinion about the legal meaning of Section 2 is.Then get back to us OK?

Please show us where the President of the Standford Law School says that it takes a 2/3rds majority of the Senate to approve a Supreme Court Justice.

Then explain how Associate Justice Alito was confirmed with a vote of 58-42. There are 100 Senators so 2/3rds would be 66.66 or 67 as a minimum voting to confirm and he didn't get that many votes.

>>>>

Ever heard of a SC nomination Senate 'filibuster? Do you understand the concept of a 60 member Senate 'Supermajority'?
You ought go back and do some further research on the subject pal. Then come back OK?

1. You still haven't shown where the President of the Standford Law Schools says it takes a 2/3rds majority to consent to a nomination.

2. A filibuster as a measure to prevent a vote in the question before the Senate, it is not vote on the question itself. (Seriously do you even know how the Senate works?)

3. You claim it takes a 2/3rds majority for the Senate to confirm a nominee, but refuse to answer "how did Justice Alito get confirmed with a 52-48 Senate vote?" which is not 2/3rds of the Senate.



>>>>

The stupid is strong in that one.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Last time I checked, the Republicans are the ones getting their way.

Elections have consequences...LMAO!!

Remember that in January 2017 and we have a Dem Senate and Dem in the Oval Office because of the childish bullshit the Senate Majority Leadership of my own ******* party is pulling.

Better to at least go through the process now then put Hillary in the Oval Office with a Dem Senate and then she is not only replacing Scalia, Ginsburg will likely retire (that makes 2), and Kennedy himself is entertaining his 80's (that could be three).

Better to go through the process now and keep the Oval Office or the Senate instead of giving them 3 nominations for anyone they want rubber stamped along with the power to do it.



>>>>>

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Last time I checked, the Republicans are the ones getting their way.

Elections have consequences...LMAO!!

Remember that in January 2017 and we have a Dem Senate and Dem in the Oval Office because of the childish bullshit the Senate Majority Leadership of my own ******* party is pulling.

Better to at least go through the process now then put Hillary in the Oval Office with a Dem Senate and then she is not only replacing Scalia, Ginsburg will likely retire (that makes 2), and Kennedy himself is entertaining his 80's (that could be three).

Better to go through the process now and keep the Oval Office or the Senate instead of giving them 3 nominations for anyone they want rubber stamped along with the power to do it.



>>>>>

I've bookmarked this post, in case you're wrong...LMAO

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

The 2010 midterms were the biggest upset in 60 years, favoring the Republicans.

You said: "Republicans have owned Congress, ever since Obama got elected"

Are forgetting 2008 -2010 -- When House and Senate were Democrat?
From 2010 to 2013 - The Dems still owned the Senate?
From 2013 to Jan 2015 - The Dems still owned the Senate?

I'm guessing you are....unless you have a different definition of *owned congress* that doesn't include the Senate, and another one that revises *since Obama got elected.*

Obama wasn't President in 2008. And, you call me stupid?...lol

I didn't say he was president in 2008, I said from 2008 -2010 -- When House and Senate were Democrat.

Any dumbfuck knows that was the election year, and Dems had all of Congress those first two years (and the prior two years too!) -- and your stupid statement: "Republicans have owned Congress, ever since Obama got elected" is stoopid.

By the same token, the Democrats didn't have a majority in Congress in 2011.

Anyone who doesn't get that, is equally stoopid...yes?

Didn't you say, "since Obama was elected?" Why yes, yes you did. Have someone explain to you that Obama was not elected in 2010.

Right, since he was elected, because the Democrats lost The House, in the very next election

 

[bodecea]

Recess appointments are moot in this case.
The Senate isn't going to go into recess.
The REP controlled Senate has officially notified the ******* WORLD!! that they will not even open the envelope sent to them with Obama's nomination in it. EVER!
Obama will already be living above Boystown when Trump and his majority Senate choose the next REP SCJ.

The Libs are melting down because The Messiah isn't getting his way.

They're so desperate that they're using the race card...lol

Who is this "Messiah" the RW keeps toting?

Obama, your Füerher...that's who.

President Obama is not "your Fuerher", nor is he a "Messiah" tho RWrs here seem to want to keep calling him such. He's the elected (twice) President of the United States, the current Head of the Executive Branch, whose job includes nominating replacements when there are vacancies on the Supreme Court. Why does that bother you? What is it that makes you not understand his position and his job?

 

[bodecea]

You said: "Republicans have owned Congress, ever since Obama got elected"

Are forgetting 2008 -2010 -- When House and Senate were Democrat?
From 2010 to 2013 - The Dems still owned the Senate?
From 2013 to Jan 2015 - The Dems still owned the Senate?

I'm guessing you are....unless you have a different definition of *owned congress* that doesn't include the Senate, and another one that revises *since Obama got elected.*

Obama wasn't President in 2008. And, you call me stupid?...lol

I didn't say he was president in 2008, I said from 2008 -2010 -- When House and Senate were Democrat.

Any dumbfuck knows that was the election year, and Dems had all of Congress those first two years (and the prior two years too!) -- and your stupid statement: "Republicans have owned Congress, ever since Obama got elected" is stoopid.

By the same token, the Democrats didn't have a majority in Congress in 2011.

Anyone who doesn't get that, is equally stoopid...yes?

Didn't you say, "since Obama was elected?" Why yes, yes you did. Have someone explain to you that Obama was not elected in 2010.

Right, since he was elected, because the Democrats lost The House, in the very next election

Which is quite common in an off year. How has that GOP majority done for those of you who elected them? Would you call them successful? Are you getting your vote's worth?

 

[Faun]

No Democrat Senate ever shut down the confirmation process to prevent a Republican president from appointing a Supreme Court Justice. So no, that's not from the Democrat's playbook, this is how the right operates.

They passed a resolution to prevent the confirmation process in an election year.

No, they didn't.

Yes, they did...LMAO!

Flashback: Senate Democrats in 1960 pass resolution against election-year Supreme Court recess appointments

Exactly how retarded are you?? Oh wait, aren't you the idiot that fell for that scam news website about Obama filling this vacancy with an executive order?

At any rate, that resolution did not prevent any president from appointing A Supreme Court justice. If anything, it conformed with the Constitution since the President shall appoint Supreme Court justices WITH the advice and consent of the Senant. So that resolution, unlike what the Senate is doing now, was actually constitutional.

Man! Insults are all you people have...lol

Can you possibly imagine how self defeating that is?

I'm not going to use vitriol when I explain, AGAIN, that there's NOTHING in the Constitution that requires the Senate to vote witin a certain time frame.

No, insults are not all we have. They merely accentuate why you can't comprehend what the Senate is doing is so wrong, it's never been done in 227 years since the U.S. Senate began convening.

 

[bodecea]

Last time I checked, the Republicans are the ones getting their way.

Elections have consequences...LMAO!!

Remember that in January 2017 and we have a Dem Senate and Dem in the Oval Office because of the childish bullshit the Senate Majority Leadership of my own ******* party is pulling.

Better to at least go through the process now then put Hillary in the Oval Office with a Dem Senate and then she is not only replacing Scalia, Ginsburg will likely retire (that makes 2), and Kennedy himself is entertaining his 80's (that could be three).

Better to go through the process now and keep the Oval Office or the Senate instead of giving them 3 nominations for anyone they want rubber stamped along with the power to do it.



>>>>>

I've bookmarked this post, in case you're wrong...LMAO

Oh, many of us have bookmarked all the threads like this. We look forward to what happens.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

They passed a resolution to prevent the confirmation process in an election year.

No, they didn't.

Yes, they did...LMAO!

Flashback: Senate Democrats in 1960 pass resolution against election-year Supreme Court recess appointments

Exactly how retarded are you?? Oh wait, aren't you the idiot that fell for that scam news website about Obama filling this vacancy with an executive order?

At any rate, that resolution did not prevent any president from appointing A Supreme Court justice. If anything, it conformed with the Constitution since the President shall appoint Supreme Court justices WITH the advice and consent of the Senant. So that resolution, unlike what the Senate is doing now, was actually constitutional.

Man! Insults are all you people have...lol

Can you possibly imagine how self defeating that is?

I'm not going to use vitriol when I explain, AGAIN, that there's NOTHING in the Constitution that requires the Senate to vote witin a certain time frame.

No, insults are not all we have. They merely accentuate why you can't comprehend what the Senate is doing is so wrong, it's never been done in 227 years since the U.S. Senate began convening.

Insults are all we ever hear from you people, so it has to be all you have. Its impossible for Liberals to make an argument without vitriol.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Last time I checked, the Republicans are the ones getting their way.

Elections have consequences...LMAO!!

Remember that in January 2017 and we have a Dem Senate and Dem in the Oval Office because of the childish bullshit the Senate Majority Leadership of my own ******* party is pulling.

Better to at least go through the process now then put Hillary in the Oval Office with a Dem Senate and then she is not only replacing Scalia, Ginsburg will likely retire (that makes 2), and Kennedy himself is entertaining his 80's (that could be three).

Better to go through the process now and keep the Oval Office or the Senate instead of giving them 3 nominations for anyone they want rubber stamped along with the power to do it.



>>>>>

I've bookmarked this post, in case you're wrong...LMAO

Oh, many of us have bookmarked all the threads like this. We look forward to what happens.

Bookmarked them for what? For when the Democrats so the same shit?...lol

 

[bodecea]

Last time I checked, the Republicans are the ones getting their way.

Elections have consequences...LMAO!!

Remember that in January 2017 and we have a Dem Senate and Dem in the Oval Office because of the childish bullshit the Senate Majority Leadership of my own ******* party is pulling.

Better to at least go through the process now then put Hillary in the Oval Office with a Dem Senate and then she is not only replacing Scalia, Ginsburg will likely retire (that makes 2), and Kennedy himself is entertaining his 80's (that could be three).

Better to go through the process now and keep the Oval Office or the Senate instead of giving them 3 nominations for anyone they want rubber stamped along with the power to do it.



>>>>>

I've bookmarked this post, in case you're wrong...LMAO

Oh, many of us have bookmarked all the threads like this. We look forward to what happens.

Bookmarked them for what? For when the Democrats so the same shit?...lol

Oh...I am sure you will find out.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Obama wasn't President in 2008. And, you call me stupid?...lol

I didn't say he was president in 2008, I said from 2008 -2010 -- When House and Senate were Democrat.

Any dumbfuck knows that was the election year, and Dems had all of Congress those first two years (and the prior two years too!) -- and your stupid statement: "Republicans have owned Congress, ever since Obama got elected" is stoopid.

By the same token, the Democrats didn't have a majority in Congress in 2011.

Anyone who doesn't get that, is equally stoopid...yes?

Didn't you say, "since Obama was elected?" Why yes, yes you did. Have someone explain to you that Obama was not elected in 2010.

Right, since he was elected, because the Democrats lost The House, in the very next election

Which is quite common in an off year. How has that GOP majority done for those of you who elected them? Would you call them successful? Are you getting your vote's worth?

It's been common in every election since Obama got elected...lol

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Last time I checked, the Republicans are the ones getting their way.

Elections have consequences...LMAO!!

Remember that in January 2017 and we have a Dem Senate and Dem in the Oval Office because of the childish bullshit the Senate Majority Leadership of my own ******* party is pulling.

Better to at least go through the process now then put Hillary in the Oval Office with a Dem Senate and then she is not only replacing Scalia, Ginsburg will likely retire (that makes 2), and Kennedy himself is entertaining his 80's (that could be three).

Better to go through the process now and keep the Oval Office or the Senate instead of giving them 3 nominations for anyone they want rubber stamped along with the power to do it.



>>>>>

I've bookmarked this post, in case you're wrong...LMAO

Oh, many of us have bookmarked all the threads like this. We look forward to what happens.

Bookmarked them for what? For when the Democrats so the same shit?...lol

Oh...I am sure you will find out.

IOW, you don't have a clue...lol

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Recess appointments are moot in this case.
The Senate isn't going to go into recess.
The REP controlled Senate has officially notified the ******* WORLD!! that they will not even open the envelope sent to them with Obama's nomination in it. EVER!
Obama will already be living above Boystown when Trump and his majority Senate choose the next REP SCJ.

The Libs are melting down because The Messiah isn't getting his way.

They're so desperate that they're using the race card...lol

Who is this "Messiah" the RW keeps toting?

Obama, your Füerher...that's who.

President Obama is not "your Fuerher", nor is he a "Messiah" tho RWrs here seem to want to keep calling him such. He's the elected (twice) President of the United States, the current Head of the Executive Branch, whose job includes nominating replacements when there are vacancies on the Supreme Court. Why does that bother you? What is it that makes you not understand his position and his job?

I didn't say he's my Füerher. I said he's YOUR Füerher...lol