It's not shaping up as a great week for Don.

[Luckyone]

I'm using the pre-computer before they stole your mind definition !

"Political hack" is a pejorative term describing a person who is more loyal to a particular political party than to their own sense of ethics.

The term "hack writer" was first used in the 18th century, "when publishing was establishing itself as a business employing writers who could produce to order."

The derivation of the term "hack" was a "shortening of hackney, which described a horse that was easy to ride and available for hire."

"Political hack" is a pejorative term describing a person who is more loyal to a particular political party than to their own sense of ethics.

A HACK WOULD WRITE THIS KNOWING SLEEPY JOE IS OUT OF HIS MIND AND A HACK READER WOULD BELIEVE !

View attachment 1186955

Thank you for the clarificación. In using your definitivo of a “political hack being blindly loyal to a party” show me any comments of mine where I am defending the Democrats. In other words, PROVE YOUR POINT”

 

[Luckyone]

Most Republicans refuse to participate in polls, been that way since 2016. Nobody bothered to clue you in on that? How sad for you.

You mean that FOX was NOT interviewing their own viewers?

 

[Rogue AI]

You mean that FOX was NOT interviewing their own viewers?

I don't know, I don't watch TV. Anyways, if you really believe polls, Hillary was President, then Kamala. That's what polls would tell you anyway. Total waste of time.

 

[Bitterhook]

Thank you for the clarificación. In using your definitivo of a “political hack being blindly loyal to a party” show me any comments of mine where I am defending the Democrats. In other words, PROVE YOUR POINT”

In light of that, would you prefer to be called a shill instead?

 

[Mack The Finger]

Thank you for the clarificación. In using your definitivo of a “political hack being blindly loyal to a party” show me any comments of mine where I am defending the Democrats. In other words, PROVE YOUR POINT”

You asked a question and I answered it....now you are choking it.

BTW: I don't remember using DEM anywhere...can you show me where I did ? When I called you a hack...I meant you are being part of the agenda.

You know...the one world order when 5-LBs of unicorn flatus would power you for a week.

 

[Luckyone]

I don't know, I don't watch TV. Anyways, if you really believe polls, Hillary was President, then Kamala. That's what polls would tell you anyway. Total waste of time.

I don’t put much value on polla, unless they are you trulla surprising. This poll from FOX was trillo surprising given that most of their viewerd are Tepublicans

 

[Rogue AI]

I don’t put much value on polla, unless they are you trulla surprising. This poll from FOX was trillo surprising given that most of their viewerd are Tepublicans

Try spell checking. Anyway, polls have proven themselves useless, putting stock in them is a foolish endeavor.

 

[sartre play]

Try spell checking. Anyway, polls have proven themselves useless, putting stock in them is a foolish endeavor.

AGREE polls are Not RELIABLE.

 

[Luckyone]

You asked a question and I answered it....now you are choking it.

BTW: I don't remember using DEM anywhere...can you show me where I did ? When I called you a hack...I meant you are being part of the agenda.

You know...the one world order when 5-LBs of unicorn flatus would power you for a week.

This was your post:

Political hack" is a pejorative term describing a person who is more loyal to a particular political party than to their own sense of ethics.

Given that your post was a criticism of my post críticizing Trump, it does suggest that you believe I am a political hack for the Democrats

 

[Bitterhook]

I don’t put much value on polla, unless they are you trulla surprising. This poll from FOX was trillo surprising given that most of their viewerd are Tepublicans

If a pollster has the skill necessary to properly analyze the data and interpret all the indications, then they also have the skill necessary to create a poll that will create whatever results they may desire. You can change the results of a poll by asking the same question in a different manner.

If you are trying to suggest that FOX's poll would be more surprising, then you admitting that you believe the data could be corrupted to produce a poll that would be equally useless either way. If the data is intentionally skewed by control group population consistent more with opinion than a verifiable benchmark of reference, then the pollster has intentionally corrupted any data they may gather.

 

[Luckyone]

Try spell checking. Anyway, polls have proven themselves useless, putting stock in them is a foolish endeavor.

You stated originally that Republicans do not participate in polls. Where did you get that data/information?

 

[Luckyone]

If a pollster has the skill necessary to properly analyze the data and interpret all the indications, then they also have the skill necessary to create a poll that will create whatever results they may desire. You can change the results of a poll by asking the same question in a different manner.

If you are trying to suggest that FOX's poll would be more surprising, then you admitting that you believe the data could be corrupted to produce a poll that would be equally useless either way. If the data is intentionally skewed by control group population consistent more with opinion than a verifiable benchmark of reference, then the pollster has intentionally corrupted any data they may gather.

I do not believe in conspira y their ira

 

[Correll]

Among those polls, here is the one from FOX itself that is the most telling:

1. Fox News Poll: Trump Rated Worse Than Biden on the Economy​

A Fox News poll conducted November 14–17 among 1,005 registered voters found that 76 percent now rate the U.S. economy negatively under Trump

View attachment 1186833

UNDER Trump? That's nicely vague.

It's only been a year. His policies have barely had tim to change the direction of the biggest economy in the world.


How many of those people blame Trump for the state of the economy? I myself just consider it in a bad place because of decades of bad policy, that is not going to change overnight and I never expected it to.

But, Trump is, IMO the right person to change the situation for the better.

 

[Correll]

I do not believe in conspira y their ira

The idea that polls can be purposefully misleading is hardly something that you can reasonably dismiss just by saying some magic words.

 

[Bitterhook]

I do not believe in conspira y their ira

You don't need to tell me what you are willing to believe, because any respectable data doesn't give a shit what you want to believe, and cannot be influenced by your beliefs.

 

[Rogue AI]

You stated originally that Republicans do not participate in polls. Where did you get that data/information?

Do you not know any Republicans? Ask them. If a pollster calls they hang up or lie for kicks.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Given that your post was a criticism of my post críticizing Trump, it does suggest that you believe I am a political hack for the Democrats

`
That was a response post @ your hackery !

You are using month old info:

AI= Cherry-picking in journalism is the practice of selectively presenting facts or data to support a specific narrative while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. This can mislead audiences by presenting an incomplete and biased picture, but can be identified by examining the data's scope, context, and whether alternative viewpoints are presented.

From your links:

Emerson College: Trump Approval Drops Among Hispanics​

Emerson Hack College’s national survey of 1,000 “active voters”, conducted November 3–4, found Trump’s approval dropping 4 points in a month (from 45 percent to 41 percent).

MTF adds from another thread:

"Donald Trump’s heightened unpopularity might be here to stay," Silver wrote earlier this month.

The figure below is not possible:

Some 33 percent said they approved of the way Trump was handling the economy, with 67 percent disapproving.

 

[Luckyone]

`
That was a response post @ your hackery !

You are sighting month old info.

AI= Cherry-picking in journalism is the practice of selectively presenting facts or data to support a specific narrative while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. This can mislead audiences by presenting an incomplete and biased picture, but can be identified by examining the data's scope, context, and whether alternative viewpoints are presented.

From your links:

Emerson College: Trump Approval Drops Among Hispanics​

Emerson Hack College’s national survey of 1,000 “active voters”, conducted November 3–4, found Trump’s approval dropping 4 points in a month (from 45 percent to 41 percent).

MTF adds from another thread:

"Donald Trump’s heightened unpopularity might be here to stay," Silver wrote earlier this month.

The figure below is not possible:

Some 33 percent said they approved of the way Trump was handling the economy, with 67 percent disapproving.

It is funny that you call me for “ignoring facts” is me giving factual data, statistics, and facts that YOU never address. What you do is attack the Messenger. It is factually YOU that ignores the facts constantly. You are truly a joke of a person

 

[22lcidw]

Yes, Trump is losing it...............FOX said it, so it MUST be true!

It's not Fox, its everything else including the kitchen sink that is Pro Progressive. That does not make it easy for Republicans. And makes Democrats look great when many are mediocre. The stresses are really on Republicans.

 

[Mack The Finger]

It is funny that you call me for “ignoring facts” is me giving factual data, statistics, and facts that YOU never address. What you do is attack the Messenger. It is factually YOU that ignores the facts constantly. You are truly a joke of a person

I am a failed comedian but I gave it my best shot.

Back to you: you're a hack no matter how you slice it.