Israelis vilified for lack of "sympathy" for Hamas savages

[rosends]

My arguments and evidence were clearly presented, and your objections are simply evasive and dishonest, like always. That's your SOP.

Thanks for not addressing the points I raised. Good attempt at obfuscation but all can see your inability to defend your claims.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Thanks for not addressing the points I raised. Good attempt at obfuscation but all can see your inability to defend your claims.

Your so-called "points" amount to cheap ad hominems and evasive maneuvering like "Israelis are for the war, but not necessarily for using explosives/bombs" Hehehehe your typical ridiculous, disingenuous claptrap. That's your SOP, and being a Yeshiva-trained, Talmudic expert you're well-versed in sophistry and lying. You Talmudic, kabbalah sorcerers are experts in obfuscating the truth and playing the innocent victims while cunningly destroying your enemies. The problem is that you talk too much:

​

My claims are defended by the incontrovertible facts. Not only do I assert that you Jewish occultists are the enemies of Western civilization and the USA, but your rabbis attest to this. The facts of history, present realities, and your people support my conclusions.

Rabbi Says Zionist Jews Must Admit Agenda of Forced 3rd World Immigration Into Western Nations

Rabbi Says Zionist Jews Must Admit Forced Agenda of 3rd World Immigration Into Western Nations

rumble.com

Unfortunately, the evidence for everything that I'm saying about Jews is supported by the facts and reality. I say "unfortunately", because I wish it wasn't the case. No amount of your BS sophistry is going to debunk anything I've said, but you can keep trying if you want.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

that's not true. When was the last time you were there to attest to this? Remember, I just came back from 2 weeks there and have family and friends who live there, with whom I discuss politics. Somehow, out of all my friends and acquaintances, I find the decided MINORITY don't like Netanyahu.

And what rigorous scientific sampling did you do to come up with your claim?

Most Israelis dislike Netanyahu, but support the war in Gaza

In January, just 15% of Israelis thought Netanyahu should stay in office.

OK, so it's not everybody, it's just 85% of the population, like a good Zionist you have to redefine words in order to make a coherent argument, like "minority means majority" and on and on and on it goes...

 

[rosends]

Most Israelis dislike Netanyahu, but support the war in Gaza

when you rely on one study from January, you miss a more recent one from May

For first time in a year, poll shows Netanyahu preferred to Gantz as prime minister

TV survey finds PM's Likud party gaining on his centrist rival’s National Unity, which also stands to lose most from a possible new alliance of PM's former right-wing partners

www.timesofisrael.com

OK, so it's not everybody, it's just 85% of the population, like a good Zionist you have to redefine words in order to make a coherent argument, like "minority means majority" and on and on and on it goes...

as a useful idiot you have to rely on not defining anything so you can say whatever you want and hope nobody looks too hard.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

when you rely on one study from January, you miss a more recent one from May

For first time in a year, poll shows Netanyahu preferred to Gantz as prime minister

TV survey finds PM's Likud party gaining on his centrist rival’s National Unity, which also stands to lose most from a possible new alliance of PM's former right-wing partners

www.timesofisrael.com

as a useful idiot you have to rely on not defining anything so you can say whatever you want and hope nobody looks too hard.

Your source (as per it's title) says nothing about the public degree of popularity of Netanyahu. It speaks about the preference for Netanyahu over Gallant, you are easily confused sometimes.

So let's take a look at a June 29 report, a meaningful, relevant statistic: 66% of Israelis prefer Netanyahu retiring from politics: Poll

Two-thirds of the Israeli public favors Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu leaving politics and not running for a new term, according to an opinion poll on Friday, Anadolu Agency reports.

The poll was conducted by the Israeli private Channel 12 which showed 66% of respondents want Netanyahu, 74, to retire and not run for a seventh term as prime minister.

27% percent of respondents support him staying in power and running for a new term.

Why is my knowledge superior to yours? because I'm not a xenophobic racial supremacist, I favor honesty and truth, I'm a simple man, no axe to grind, just honest fact based reasoning and a desire for justice, that's me, that's Sherlock Holmes.

 

[georgephillip]

Moral equivalence between Israel and the Gazan attackers is an outrage, pure and simple. What Hamas conducted was a barbarous massacre, much like September 11. The organizers did not die; the inflamed minions they sent did.

What does your "moral equivalence" argument tell you about racist monsters who snipe children for Greater Israel?

American surgeon who volunteered in Gaza says IDF snipers shoot toddlers | MR Online

"An American surgeon who volunteered in Gaza told 'CBS Sunday Morning' in an interview that aired Sunday that Israeli snipers were purposely shooting Palestinian children, including toddlers.

"'I had children who were shot twice,' said Dr. Mark Perlmutter, who said he was in Gaza at the end of April and the first couple weeks of May.

"I have two children that I have photographs of that were shot so perfectly in the chest I couldn’t put my stethoscope over their heart more accurately and directly on the side of the head in the same child.

"Perlmutter added, 'No toddler gets shot twice by mistake by "the world’s best snipers." And they’re dead-center shots.'

"Other foreign doctors who volunteered in Gaza gave a similar account to The Guardian back in April, saying Israeli snipers were shooting children in the head."

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

What does your "moral equivalence" argument tell you about racist monsters who snipe children for Greater Israel?

American surgeon who volunteered in Gaza says IDF snipers shoot toddlers | MR Online

"An American surgeon who volunteered in Gaza told 'CBS Sunday Morning' in an interview that aired Sunday that Israeli snipers were purposely shooting Palestinian children, including toddlers.

"'I had children who were shot twice,' said Dr. Mark Perlmutter, who said he was in Gaza at the end of April and the first couple weeks of May.


"Perlmutter added, 'No toddler gets shot twice by mistake by "the world’s best snipers." And they’re dead-center shots.'

"Other foreign doctors who volunteered in Gaza gave a similar account to The Guardian back in April, saying Israeli snipers were shooting children in the head."

I can just see the Zionists here typing "No, those kids were shot by Hamas"

 

[rosends]

Your source (as per it's title) says nothing about the public degree of popularity of Netanyahu. It speaks about the preference for Netanyahu over Gallant, you are easily confused sometimes.

So let's take a look at a June 29 report, a meaningful, relevant statistic: 66% of Israelis prefer Netanyahu retiring from politics: Poll

Why is my knowledge superior to yours? because I'm not a xenophobic racial supremacist, I favor honesty and truth, I'm a simple man, no axe to grind, just honest fact based reasoning and a desire for justice, that's me, that's Sherlock Holmes.

Oh, so you equate wanting a change in government with "disliking" him as a person. Why are you so stupid? Do you equate the idea that someone is popular with the idea that people agree with his political positions? You'd be surprised at how many people have a sense of respect and even liking for Bibi but don't agree with certain decisions he has made. But, no, you can just stick with what you think you know, which really isn't much.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Oh, so you equate wanting a change in government with "disliking" him as a person. Why are you so stupid? Do you equate the idea that someone is popular with the idea that people agree with his political positions? You'd be surprised at how many people have a sense of respect and even liking for Bibi but don't agree with certain decisions he has made. But, no, you can just stick with what you think you know, which really isn't much.

Try to be more thorough, this is what I actually said a few posts ago: "Everybody in Israel is giving Nazinyahu the finger".

I used a metaphor for disapproval, dissatisfaction, contempt, I never used the word "disliking" so why you put that in quotes is far from clear, perhaps you can explain?

When 66% of the people do not want him to run the government I consider that to be disapproval, wanting him gone - you know

 

[rosends]

Try to be more thorough, this is what I actually said a few posts ago: "Everybody in Israel is giving Nazinyahu the finger".

yes. That's something you do to people you don't like. Or maybe you do it to your friends.

I used a metaphor for disapproval, dissatisfaction, contempt, I never used the word "disliking" so why you put that in quotes is far from clear, perhaps you can explain?

That's not a metaphor. It is a physical expression of more than disapproval. Or maybe in your world it is just regular disapproval. "Hey, Bob. I'm not liking this chili. I flip the bird to this chili." In polite cosiety, one does not simply express disapproval by giving someone the finger.

When 66% of the people do not want him to run the government I consider that to be disapproval, wanting him gone - you know

Disapproval of some of his policies. You really should talk to israelis as I have. They think he is a strong politican and a good speaker to the West. As I said, the majority I have actually interacted with don't disapprove of him but of the government he has assembled. You should learn the difference.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Try to be more thorough, this is what I actually said a few posts ago: "Everybody in Israel is giving Nazinyahu the finger".

I used a metaphor for disapproval, dissatisfaction, contempt, I never used the word "disliking" so why you put that in quotes is far from clear, perhaps you can explain?

When 66% of the people do not want him to run the government I consider that to be disapproval, wanting him gone - you know

Rosen is pedantic and disingenuous, often splitting hairs and straining at trivial details. He engages with us goyim in bad faith, using rhetoric as a mere tap dance routine.

 

[rosends]

Rosen is pedantic and disingenuous, often splitting hairs and straining at trivial details. He engages with us goyim in bad faith, using rhetoric as a mere tap dance routine.


4o

can't keep up? Not surprised.

 

[TruthNotBS]

can't keep up? Not surprised.

Your reliance on pedantic splitting of hairs and sophistry doesn't equate to a superior argument. Mistaking this for intellectual prowess only highlights your confusion and delusion.

 

[rosends]

Your reliance on pedantic splitting of hairs and sophistry doesn't equate to a superior argument. Mistaking this for intellectual prowess only highlights your confusion and delusion.

being unable to draw distinctions or agree on shared language and definitions means that your arguments are doomed to failure. Thinking that a blunderbuss approach is appropriate for make subtle arguments just speaks to your ham fisted approach and lack of knowledge.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

yes. That's something you do to people you don't like. Or maybe you do it to your friends.

That's not a metaphor. It is a physical expression of more than disapproval. Or maybe in your world it is just regular disapproval. "Hey, Bob. I'm not liking this chili. I flip the bird to this chili." In polite cosiety, one does not simply express disapproval by giving someone the finger.

Disapproval of some of his policies. You really should talk to israelis as I have. They think he is a strong politican and a good speaker to the West. As I said, the majority I have actually interacted with don't disapprove of him but of the government he has assembled. You should learn the difference.

The views and opinions of your friends and acquaintances are not what were discussing. We're discussing my claim that Nazinyahu is disapproved of by the majority of Israelis - 66% - in that particular article from June.

The US debased itself (because of its fear of Israel) and almost all congress obediently stood and clapped on cue, as a few dedicated and servile congressman repeatedly took the lead in that gesture, as the rest all followed along like sheep (with a few honorable exceptions like Tlaib) terrified of what would be said about them had they refused to do so, it was a circus show, a spectacle to behold.

Nazinyahu wants to continue attacking Gaza and destroying its infrastructure, services and social structures and it wants US support in that endeavor. He cares nothing about hostages being freed, that's the last thing he wants. He want the US to lie on behalf of Israel, to participate in inarguable slaughter and genocide.

 

[TruthNotBS]

being unable to draw distinctions or agree on shared language and definitions means that your arguments are doomed to failure. Thinking that a blunderbuss approach is appropriate for make subtle arguments just speaks to your ham fisted approach and lack of knowledge.

Your attempt to complicate straightforward issues and use sophistry to bolster your position doesn't strengthen your argument; it exposes your lack of sincerity. You make dishonest and irrelevant points, pretending the situation is more complex than it is to confuse the issue and create distractions. Your hair-splitting doesn't equate to genuine intellectual rigor but rather highlights your insincerity on the matter. That's your SOP.

 

[rosends]

The views and opinions of your friends and acquaintances are not what were discussing. We're discussing my claim that Nazinyahu is disapproved of by the majority of Israelis - 66% - in that particular article from June.

Yes, unproven by the polls. You ignored this when I first pointed it out so I'm just trying to help by reiterating it.

 

[rosends]

Your attempt to complicate straightforward issues and use sophistry to bolster your position doesn't strengthen your argument; it exposes your lack of sincerity.

Your need to keep discussion on a level of simplicity which reduces, conflates and obscures just shows the intellectual limitations you are working under.

You make dishonest and irrelevant points, pretending the situation is more complex than it is to confuse the issue and create distractions. Your hair-splitting doesn't equate to genuine intellectual rigor but rather highlights your insincerity on the matter. That's your SOP.

You think the situation is simple. You have the mind of a child. You should let the big people talk and you can just stand in the corner.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Your need to keep discussion on a level of simplicity which reduces, conflates and obscures just shows the intellectual limitations you are working under.

You think the situation is simple. You have the mind of a child. You should let the big people talk and you can just stand in the corner.

The situation is straightforward, and your need to obscure it with irrelevant complexity and sophistry reveals your inability to engage honestly. You’ve ignored practically all of the points I’ve made, doing the same to Sherlock.

 

[rosends]

Resorting to condescension and obscurity doesn’t strengthen your argument, Rosen. It only highlights your disingenuous tactics. The situation is straightforward, and your need to obscure it with irrelevant complexity and sophistry reveals your inability to engage honestly. You’ve ignored practically all of the points I’ve made, doing the same to Sherlock.

You feel it is condescending because you consider yourself inferior. You think it is obscurity because you don't understand it. The situation is extremely complex.

“Explanations exist; they have existed for all time; there is always a well-known solution to every human problem — neat, plausible, and wrong.” H.L. Mencken