Israel MUST stop recieving all USA funds

[Rigby5]

Just which cult exactly do you belong to where they repeat all of this garbage and you end up believing it?

So what if all humans may have come from Africa?

There are no earliest records where Canaanites are referred to as Arabs, and you definitely would not find evidence from any people in the area which would say such a thing, or Arabic written in any pottery, or any archeological evidence found to this day.

I would fight your attempt to rewrite the history of this region as I would if anyone was trying to change the history of the Aboriginals, Mauri, Hawaiians, Mayans, Aztecs, Apache, Blackfeet, and all the other hundreds of indigenous people of the world.

No one is attempting to rewrite and destroy the history of one people, and one people only. The Jewish People.


The only ones who do it are Christians and Muslims who were taught to hate Jews from their. "holy" books.

One is not allowed to lie in order to destroy a people who have brought nothing but good things to the world, unlike Christianity and Islam.


Educate yourself and stop the hatred.

All archeologists, anthropologists, etc., know that the earliest humans went from Africa to the Levant, and from there to the Arabian Peninsula, later.
They catalog people by their language, and the early humans in the Levant, they decided to call Arab, based on their source of the Semitic languages there.
So than all people using a language of Semitic origins, like the Hebrew, those who later went to the Arabian Peninsula, etc., are known officially as Arabs.

And you are totally ignorant about religions.
Both Christians and Moslems consider themselves to be reformed Jews, and do NOT hate Jews at all.

But clearly modern Jews are not really Hebrew any more, and have violated the atonement Jews are supposed to be doing now.
They are supposed to atone for the sins of arrogance and pride, until the Messiah comes to tell them they are forgiven.
To instead invade Palestine, is pure evil.
You invalidate two thousand years of atonement by ancestors.

 

[Rigby5]

Again, which cult do you belong to where they would repeat and repeat such a thing until you came to believe it?

This is all scientific sources.
There is no disagreement among any educated.
Semitic means, "of an Arab language group".
Arabs came first to the Levant.
Hebrew are later branch of Arabs.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Wrong.
After the Asian invasions around 1200, Arabs ruled nothing any more.
After around 1200, the Mongols, Moghuls, Turks, Moors, and Mamelukes were in power.
And they were not Arab.

You know nothing of Jews or Islam.
Mohammad would have lost to the Meccans if not for the Jews deciding to defend him.
Jews were the majority of Mohammad's army.
Mohammad did not attack or enslave Jews.
There was one tribe that turned traitor and were annihilated by the other Jewish tribes, not Mohammad.
The Banu Qurayza tried to assassinate Mohammad and the other 11 tribes of Jews punished them for their crime.

Why did Prophet Muhammed kill around 400 Jewish traitors of Banu Qurayza Fighters? - Islam Compass

🔊 Listen to this 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐭 𝐌𝐮𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝟒𝟎𝟎 𝐉𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐮 𝐐𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐲𝐳𝐚 𝐅𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬? Mohamad Mostafa NassarTwitter:@NassarMohamadMR 𝐈𝐧 𝐚 𝐍𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝟗𝟎𝟎 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫, 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬, 𝐟𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝟒𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟒𝟎𝟎. 𝐓𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞...

islamcompass.com

{...
When the Prophet (saw) migrated to Medina, he agreed a treaty with the Jews of Banu Qurayza for the protection of the city against invaders. This was a critical treaty as the Banu Qurayza were settled at the rear of Medina – a weak point exploitable by enemies in a battle.

During the battle of the trench, the Quraysh and her allies could not breach the front of Medina due to the trench that was used to defend it. They then sought an agreement with Banu Qurayza to allow them to attack from the rear of the city.

The Banu Qurayza Jews thus violated their treaty with the Prophet (saw) creating an existential issue for the Muslim community. Following the battle, they received the punishment specified in the treaty. They deserved the punishment even according to their scripture, modern international law, and treaty they violated.

When the Prophet (saw) surrounded them for twenty-five days, he promised whoever did not contribute and came out peacefully would be released. Number of people did so such as Amr ibn Sa’d.
...}

Oh, yes, the Islamic version of events.

Not going to discuss any of this here. Totally out of topic, as you have been all along.

 

[Sixties Fan]

So?
What does the slave trade after 1800 have to do with anything?

Slave trade began after 1800 CE? Seriously?

Of course you are serious.

 

[Rigby5]

Oh, yes, the Islamic version of events.

Not going to discuss any of this here. Totally out of topic, as you have been all along.

Accurate historical accounts, which invalidate modern Israel completely.
Which is totally on topic, and why the US should stop funding Israel.

 

[Rigby5]

Slave trade began after 1800 CE? Seriously?

Of course you are serious.

The slave trade was insignificant in the US before 1800 and the invention of the cotton gin.
There was some slave trade in the Caribbean for sugar for rum before then, but the British were winding that down.

 

[JGalt]

So?
What does the slave trade after 1800 have to do with anything?

Here is the US, everything. Except for the slave trade going on even still today. The left doesn't seem to give a shit about that.

 

[JGalt]

But by 1200 AD, Islam was taken over by Asian invaders, and was no longer Arab.
It was Mongol, Moghul, Turk, Moor, and Mameluke.

The majority of whom were Muslim.

 

[Sixties Fan]

This is all scientific sources.
There is no disagreement among any educated.
Semitic means, "of an Arab language group".
Arabs came first to the Levant.
Hebrew are later branch of Arabs.

You pick and choose what the word semitic means, with no link to prove yourself correct because you are only repeating what has been repeated to you without actually doing the research or homework necessary.

The Hebrew People, who became the Children of Israel, and had Monarchies going on for over a thousand years, not 250 years as your cult tells you,
are the ones referred to by the Greeks, Assyrians, Babylonians, Romans, Byzantine, Muslims.

They are the ones with a HISTORY in the region, verified by all the invaders and others who did trade with them.

The Hebrew people are not a branch of the Arab people.

Arabs are from Arabia

Jews are from Judea

Anything else your cult keeps telling you in order to destroy Israel and destroy the Jews they have learned to hate, is nothing but a disgusting continuation of what Christianity and Islam have practiced since they were founded.

Thing Jews is a SPORT to both ideologies.

Time to change that.
Se·mit·ic

1. relating to or denoting a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic and certain ancient languages such as Phoenician and Akkadian, constituting the main subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family.
   
   
2. 2.
   relating to the peoples who speak Semitic languages, especially Hebrew and Arabic.
   
   
   
   
   

 

[Sixties Fan]

Here is the US, everything. Except for the slave trade going on even still today. The left doesn't seem to give a shit about that.

The Republicans in the US continue to miss their slaves. They want slavery back.
Which is why they keep begging to secede from the Union, so that they can make blacks and others slaves again.

Educate yourself !!!!!

 

[Rigby5]

Here is the US, everything. Except for the slave trade going on even still today. The left doesn't seem to give a shit about that.

The whole US that does not have union representation is still actually a slave trade.

 

[Rigby5]

The majority of whom were Muslim.

Irrelevant.
These invaders adopted Islam in name only, so they could use it for power.
It is like conquistadors claiming to be Christian when they massacred natives in the New World.
They were not really Christian at all.

 

[Sixties Fan]

The slave trade was insignificant in the US before 1800 and the invention of the cotton gin.
There was some slave trade in the Caribbean for sugar for rum before then, but the British were winding that down.

Tell that to all the Africans who were brought in in slave ships from 1619 on.

When Did Slavery Start?​

Hundreds of thousands of Africans, both free and enslaved, aided the establishment and survival of colonies in the Americas and the New World. However, many consider a significant starting point to slavery in America to be 1619, when the privateer The White Lion brought 20 enslaved African ashore in the British colony of Jamestown, Virginia. The crew had seized the Africans from the Portugese slave ship Sao Jao Bautista.

U.S. Slavery: Timeline, Figures & Abolition | HISTORY

Slavery in America was the legal institution of enslaving human beings, mainly Africans and African Americans. Slavery existed in the United States from its founding in 1776 and became the main cause behind the country's bloody Civil War. Slavery officially ended in America with the passage of...

www.history.com

​

​

​

In the 1800s indeed. Keep showing your need to remain ignorant of any history you do not want to know about.​

 

[Sixties Fan]

Irrelevant.
These invaders adopted Islam in name only, so they could use it for power.
It is like conquistadors claiming to be Christian when they massacred natives in the New World.
They were not really Christian at all.

Again, you believe what you want to believe.

It makes you feel better.

As if Christian conquistadores are any different from the Byzantine, or the Crusaders, or the Christians who went to Hawaii or Australia or New Zealand.

Or maybe you are just against the Spanish Christians as they were the "conquistadores"?

Is that it? Are you prejudiced against the Spanish people or Spain?

 

[Rigby5]

You pick and choose what the word semitic means, with no link to prove yourself correct because you are only repeating what has been repeated to you without actually doing the research or homework necessary.

The Hebrew People, who became the Children of Israel, and had Monarchies going on for over a thousand years, not 250 years as your cult tells you,
are the ones referred to by the Greeks, Assyrians, Babylonians, Romans, Byzantine, Muslims.

They are the ones with a HISTORY in the region, verified by all the invaders and others who did trade with them.

The Hebrew people are not a branch of the Arab people.

Arabs are from Arabia

Jews are from Judea

Anything else your cult keeps telling you in order to destroy Israel and destroy the Jews they have learned to hate, is nothing but a disgusting continuation of what Christianity and Islam have practiced since they were founded.

Thing Jews is a SPORT to both ideologies.

Time to change that.
Se·mit·ic

1. relating to or denoting a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic and certain ancient languages such as Phoenician and Akkadian, constituting the main subgroup of the Afro-Asiatic family.
   
   
2. 2.
   relating to the peoples who speak Semitic languages, especially Hebrew and Arabic.
   

Wrong.
Arabs are the root origin of all the Semitic languages.
They did NOT come from the Arabuan Peninsula, but simple are associated with the Arabian Peninsula do to the peak being there.
That is like claiming the US came from New England, when in reality the US was colonized by Europeans.

Jews can NOT be from Judea because there is no trace of them there before their 1000 BC invasion.

And you do not know how to even interpret your own link.
Clearly Semitic people originated in the Levant and the Hebrew are only one of the later branches.

{...
Ancient Semitic-speaking peoples or Proto-Semitic people were Western Asian people who lived throughout the ancient Near East, including the Levant, Mesopotamia, the Arabian Peninsula, and the Horn of Africa from the 3rd millennium BC until the end of antiquity.

Their languages are usually divided into three branches: East, Central and South Semitic languages. The Proto-Semitic language was likely spoken in the 4th millennium BC, and the oldest attested forms of Semitic date to the mid-3rd millennium BC (the Early Bronze Age).

Speakers of East Semitic include the people of the Akkadian Empire, Assyria and Babylonia. Central Semitic combines the Northwest Semitic languages and Arabic. Speakers of Northwest Semitic were the Canaanites (including the Phoenicians and the Hebrews) and the Arameans. South Semitic peoples include the speakers of Modern South Arabian languages and Ethiopian Semitic languages.
...}

Ancient Semitic-speaking peoples - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Rigby5]

Tell that to all the Africans who were brought in in slave ships from 1619 on.

When Did Slavery Start?​

Hundreds of thousands of Africans, both free and enslaved, aided the establishment and survival of colonies in the Americas and the New World. However, many consider a significant starting point to slavery in America to be 1619, when the privateer The White Lion brought 20 enslaved African ashore in the British colony of Jamestown, Virginia. The crew had seized the Africans from the Portugese slave ship Sao Jao Bautista.

U.S. Slavery: Timeline, Figures & Abolition | HISTORY

Slavery in America was the legal institution of enslaving human beings, mainly Africans and African Americans. Slavery existed in the United States from its founding in 1776 and became the main cause behind the country's bloody Civil War. Slavery officially ended in America with the passage of...

www.history.com

​

​

​

In the 1800s indeed. Keep showing your need to remain ignorant of any history you do not want to know about.​

Wrong.
The Spanish started the New World slave trade, not the English.
But the main slave trade did not happen until after the cotton gin was invented.

 

[Rigby5]

Again, you believe what you want to believe.

It makes you feel better.

As if Christian conquistadores are any different from the Byzantine, or the Crusaders, or the Christians who went to Hawaii or Australia or New Zealand.

Or maybe you are just against the Spanish Christians as they were the "conquistadores"?

Is that it? Are you prejudiced against the Spanish people or Spain?

The conquistadors were the worst because they claimed a racial basis for massacre and slavery that is the most unChristian of all.
But you are correct the Byzantine, Romans, previous empires were also awful.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Wrong.
Arabs are the root origin of all the Semitic languages.
They did NOT come from the Arabuan Peninsula, but simple are associated with the Arabian Peninsula do to the peak being there.
That is like claiming the US came from New England, when in reality the US was colonized by Europeans.

Jews can NOT be from Judea because there is no trace of them there before their 1000 BC invasion.

And you do not know how to even interpret your own link.
Clearly Semitic people originated in the Levant and the Hebrew are only one of the later branches.

{...
Ancient Semitic-speaking peoples or Proto-Semitic people were Western Asian people who lived throughout the ancient Near East, including the Levant, Mesopotamia, the Arabian Peninsula, and the Horn of Africa from the 3rd millennium BC until the end of antiquity.

Their languages are usually divided into three branches: East, Central and South Semitic languages. The Proto-Semitic language was likely spoken in the 4th millennium BC, and the oldest attested forms of Semitic date to the mid-3rd millennium BC (the Early Bronze Age).

Speakers of East Semitic include the people of the Akkadian Empire, Assyria and Babylonia. Central Semitic combines the Northwest Semitic languages and Arabic. Speakers of Northwest Semitic were the Canaanites (including the Phoenicians and the Hebrews) and the Arameans. South Semitic peoples include the speakers of Modern South Arabian languages and Ethiopian Semitic languages.
...}

Ancient Semitic-speaking peoples - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It says "other theories" want to point to Arabia as the origin of the semitic languages.

It has nothing to do with Arabs being one people, Hebrews another people, Akkadians, Baylonians, Assyrians, Persians, and all others being different people with different languages and culture and creating their history on the land where their history is known for.

You keep assuming that Jews are only the Hebrews when in reality they are a conglomeration of peoples who lived there in the area and became Jews, like the
Jebusites who were defeated by King David. And any who converted to Judaism afterwards.


No Study anywhere says that all people and all languages in that area have an origin from Arabia or from Arabic.

Your comparison is total nonsense.


Where EXACTLY from your link, does it say that Arabic is the original, mother tongue of all of those people and eventually it branched out into all of those languages?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Wrong.
The Spanish started the New World slave trade, not the English.
But the main slave trade did not happen until after the cotton gin was invented.

You mentioned the US, in the 1800s. Not Mexico or Central and South America.

I corrected you. The British brought the first slaves to what became a British colony known as America in 1619.

The Spaniards tried to enslave the Natives and it did not work out. So they used Africans later.


------------------

Slavery in colonial Spanish America - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In the vocabulary of the time, each enslaved African who arrived at the Americas was called "Pieza de Indias" (en: a piece of the Indies). The crown issued licenses asientos, to merchants to specifically trade slaves, regulating the trade. During the 16th century, the Spanish colonies were the most important customers of the Atlantic slave trade, claiming several thousands in sales, but other European colonies soon dwarfed these numbers when their demand for enslaved workers began to drive the slave market to unprecedented levels.[25]

 

[Sixties Fan]

The conquistadors were the worst because they claimed a racial basis for massacre and slavery that is the most unChristian of all.
But you are correct the Byzantine, Romans, previous empires were also awful.

But the British were not? Awful?

Slavery is slavery.

And the fact that there had to be a civil war in the US......to keep the South's slaves.......well....that was not the Conquistadores.

All slavery is awful. And the Republicans in the US want to bring it back.