Israel Breaches The Ceasefire Terms

[docmauser1]

What evidence? It confirms that non-Jews cannot buy land in Israel.

Poor souls, acting up like thoroughly spoiled children. There're always other places in the hood to try their luck in buying land, of course.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Where is the surrender and treaty to cede land to Israel?

When did palistanians have any land in the first place is the relevant question here, of course.

Poppycock!

That question has NO relevance and is simply BS.

The Arabs in the land, were not owners to begin with. That is a valid point. Sucks to be you.

And the Jews did?

And don't bother with your childish quips

Actually depending on which LoN treaty you look at they did. Or if you look at montes C&P you see the arabs owned 0.8% while the Jews owned 4.8%. Now who owned the most land again ?

Actually private property ownership is irrelevant to this discussion. It is the rights to a country that is relevant.

Everyone has the same rights whether they are homeless, rent a house or apartment, or own a $5M mansion. They all have equal rights to nationality, citizenship, self determination, and territorial integrity.

Owning a piece of land is meaningless.

 

[teddyearp]

Go back, take a deep breath and read your post... You see, ownership is a temporary illusion of the mind...

But palistanians and their cheerleaders are suffering from it on a permanent basis, of course.

What do Australians have to do with this?

"Palistan is located just off the Crowie Creek in central New South Wales a distance of about 440km west-northwest from Sydney (show me). Palistan is at an altitude of approximately 246m. The nearest sea is the Tasman Sea which is part of the South Pacific Ocean about 430km east-southeast of Palistan."

Map of Palistan in New South Wales - Bonzle Digital Atlas of Australia

So with this it is obvious that you realize that your arguement has been shot to hell, since your best comeback is to find a spelling error?

EPIC FAIL! Besides, you don't even really care for Christians, do you Sara?

 

[teddyearp]

Typically people will leave an area of conflict for the safety of their families. Look at all of those who have left Syria and Iraq in recent years. It doesn't mater why they left, they still have the right to return to their homes.

Only if they are prepared to stop all belligerence, violence and terrorism and live peacefully with the rest of the country. Failure to agree with this means they don't want to live in peace

How many Palestinians were expelled because they could not, in fact, live peacefully with their neighbors?

Less that 5,000 according to independent historical sources, the rest left freely on the promise of picking over the scraps left when the arab muslim armies mass murdered all the Jews. Guess the arab muslim armies have never been up to the task..........

From the UN Mediator's final report published after his death (Count Folke Bernadotte and French Air Force colonel Serot were assassinated by Jew terrorists):

UNITED NATIONS PROGRESS REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS MEDIATOR ON PALESTINE SUBMITTED TO THE SECRETARY-GENERAL FOR TRANSMISSION TO THE MEMBERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS In pursuance of paragraph 2, part II, of resolution 186 (S-2) of the General Assembly of 14 May 1948​

"Arab refugees

14. A new and difficult element has entered into the Palestine problem as a result of the exodus of more than 300,000 Arabs from their former homes in Palestine. The measures being taken or contemplated to cope with this problem are described in part III of this report. The question of their ultimate resettlement, either in their former abodes or elsewhere, must be faced and solved. I have affirmed elsewhere in this report that the right of the refugees to return to their homes if they so desire must be safeguarded. Nevertheless, whether or not this right is exercised, most of these refugees will require assistance in some degree to re-establish themselves."

- See more at: Mediation truce supervision refugees proposals for peaceful settlement a.k.a. Bernadotte plan - UN Mediator on Palestine - Progress report 16 September 1948

Like to hear the sound of your own voice? You're quoting and responding to your own post.

 

[teddyearp]

Hmm, so what does all these land rights discussions have to do with the subject of this thread?

I know. There wasn't enough evidence to support the OP that it HAS to be deflected (again) derailed (again) detracted (again) confused (again) and again and again and again . . . . . . .

But Androw, I think you did post some pretty awesome stuff in here, thanks.

 

[Andylusion]

Hmm, so what does all these land rights discussions have to do with the subject of this thread?

I know. There wasn't enough evidence to support the OP that it HAS to be deflected (again) derailed (again) detracted (again) confused (again) and again and again and again . . . . . . .

But Androw, I think you did post some pretty awesome stuff in here, thanks.

Thanks.

To be fair, to the people not part of the conflict, everything ties back to land. And that's really what it's all about. The Arabs can easily tolerate Jews, under one condition, they are not in control. As long as there is no Jewish state, they can take being slaughtered, being brutalized, being oppressed, even being conquered by dozens of empires throughout the ages.... but it can't be Jews.

That's why when Israel offered about 75% of their land to Arafat, he declined. He knew that if the Arabs accepted the deal, it would eliminate their one and only claim to justified violence against Israel, and that's never going to stop until either Israel is eliminated or the Arabs are wiped out.

But of course, the land argument is bogus from the start. We've all seen it a million times.

To everyone else, it's merely a land issue. To the Jews and Mulisms, it's nothing more than mutual annihilation.