Islamo "christian" Arabs? Some "christian" Arabs: Islamized in "palestine" [Israel / Holyland]

Sayaras

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2023
Messages
5,897
Reaction score
3,614
Points
938
Comment:

Many Arab Christians serve in IDF.

Overwhelming majority are great citizens.

Some have been influenced by bad actors and turned to Islamized propaganda. The major influence was al Husseini, already dcades before he joined Hitler.

chrome_screenshot_Aug 14, 2025 7_44_42 AM GMT+03_00.webp



From
here

Many Arab-Christians have beeen Islamicized, influenced by Islamism, prominent in Arab-Nazi work, ideology, admiration.
Arab Christians, for centuries, were heavily influenced by the surrounding [dominant] Islamic culture.


chrome_screenshot_Oct 21, 2024 11_59_04 PM EDT.webp

By 1937, Arab-Christians joined the Arab-Muslims in celebrating Muhammad’s birthday by displaying pictures of Hitler & Mussolini.[1]

images.webp

A.

Such was the case with Nazism admirer Michel Aflaq (1910-1989) [ميشيل عفلق] one of the founders of the Ba’ath who stated: ‘We were racists, admiring Nazism, reading its books and the source of its thought…'[2]. Aflaq was influenced by Islamic thought and sought to reconcile it with their nationalist and socialist ideals. He considered Islam to be a manifestation of “Arab genius” and deemed the ancient pre-Islamic civilisations of the Fertile Crescent to be Arab too.[3]
This is how Qatar’s pro terrorism, Jihad promoting al-Jazeera [2.12.08] described him: ‘Aflaq called for a struggle against foreign influences, and stressed that the Baath message was the eternal message of the Arab nation, no different in its values and divine inspiration than that of Islam. He did not seek to take Islam out of Arabism; he sought to make Arabism the central tenet of Islam, praising the revolutionary aspect of Islam.’
Later on, “the Baath Party Influences the Islamic State.”[4]

500px-Filastin_1936_issue.webp


B.


‘Falastin’ [فلسطين‎] newspaper:
Though the principle two cousins founders were Arab Christians: Eissa alEissa [داود العيسى, يوسف العيسى], already 1913,[5] it published a hate poem by Sheikh Suleiman al-Taji al-Faruqi [سليمان التاجي] (1882 – 1958) that combined antisemitic canard with Quranic theme – causing the Ottoman authorities to ban ut for inciting “racial hatred.”[6] ‘Falastin’ disseminated an Islamist propaganda such as about the Temple Mount / Western Wall and beyond.
In addition, the masses the ‘Falastin’ catered to were more of the Islamic faith, being Palestine’s overall most prominent newspaper, moreso in the 1920s. ‘Falastin’ followed the line by Islamic figure the Mufti al-Husseini and propagated for him. In 1928, despite Zionists conciliatory tone, the Arab press, such as the “Falastin, an extremist pro-Mufti newspaper,”[7] went as far as deny Jews’ right to Jerusalem’s holy place.
For some years it directly propagated for the Mufti.[8] The newspaper already in May 1933, glorified Hitler as “noble” and justified his persecution of the Jews, dragging the infamous ‘Protocols’ forgery.[9]

C.

Issa Basil Bandak [Eissa el Bendak] (1891-1984) [عيسى باسل البندك], in 1931, “The delegation came to the United States last Spring on behalf of the Grand Mufti’s party to raise funds and propagandize the Arab cause.”[10] In Sep 1933, “Eissa Bendak, editor of the radical bi-weekly ‘Sawt Al Shaab’ published in Bethlehem, has left for Paris where he will receive instructions from a group of Germans and Arabs on ‘conducting Nazi propaganda’ in Palestine. Bendak was instrumental in organizing the Arab Fascist Party at Bethlehem.”[11] As representative of the Bethlehem District for the Muslim-Christian Association, he prioritized Muslims. Bandak defended anti-Christian Muslim ‘YMMA’ with propaganda and had promoted Muslims’ rights even when on the expense of Christians.'[12]

download - 2025-08-14T073409.175.webp


D.

Issa Nakhleh (1915-2003) [عيسى نخلة], who, as ‘Falastin’ correspondent in London, in 1939 had justified Arab propaganda office in Nazi Germany,[13] had glorified Nazi regime in his ‘America y Oriente’ in the 1950s in Argentina[14], then, in 1961 had worked for the Mufti in his P.A.D. in NYC, claiming he was a “refugee,”[15] there he justified Nazi enmity of Jews and began pushing the debunked ‘Khazar’,[16] he was the main torch carrier of his “legacy” Arab-Nazi alliance post WW2, had worked, for decades, with neo nazis, supremacists,[17] denied the Holocaust publicity,[18] served as Judicial Adviser to the World Muslim Congress.[19] He authored a book glorifying the Quran in 2002.[20]

download - 2025-08-14T073428.280.webp


cd21d45c890e750c9ea0b1f22c837910586ddc11.webp

E.

Emil Ghuri [Ghory / Ghouri] (1907-1984) [إميل غوري], on July 7, 1934, in his short-lived publication, ‘Arab Federation’: “Hitler whom the Arabs admire very much.”[21]
A report of the British General Service of Intelligence, on December 1, 1941, listed Emil Ghouri as one of a group “who are responsible for propaganda, intrigue, and subversive activities in side and outside Iraq.”[22]
A “terrorist and conspirator in the Iraq Revolt,”[23] in the 1941 Arab-Nazi coup.
He was the organizer and political leader of the underground Arab army, and is alleged to be one of those responsible for internal terror against Arab opponents of the Mufti and Arabs who sell land to the Jews. He advocated that all Jews who came to Palestine since 1918 be regarded as for eigners and be deprived of rights in an independent Arab Palestine.[22]
Ghuri headed the creation of the “Youth Groups”, the party’s youth movement, and was a member of a special committee that ran the organization.[24] The youth movement resembled the “Hitler Youth” in Nazi Germany, and the committee even officially called the groups “Nazi Scouts” for a short period of time, but after a certain period the name was changed to the Islamic nickname “Al-Futuwwa”.[25]
In May 1945 as the Mufti al-Husseini was held under house arrest near Paris by the French government. Emil Ghouri (as the secretary of the Arab Higher Committee and general secretary of the Palestine Arab Party), ‘had emphasized the continuing “influence and esteem” that Husseini retained in Palestine, and he, too, wanted to be able to reassure Husseini’s supporters who were viewing his condition “with anxiety.”'[26]
In May 1947, Ghuri attacked the Jews rejecting the Mufti for his Nazi work had compared Hitler’s Mufti to George Washington and to “the founder of Christianity.”[27]
In a Feb 1948 report: “The leading members of the Higher Committee in Palestine are Dr. Hussein Khalidi and W. Emil Ghoury who have both made public their approval of Arab violence and their intention to intensify it in the future.”
[28] As still the Secretary of the Palestinian Arab Higher Command, in an interview with the Lebanese newspaper ‘The Beirut Telegraph’ on September 6, 1948 he said: “The fact that there are these refugees is a direct consequence of the act of the Arab states in opposing partition and the Jewish state. The Arab states agreed upon this policy unanimously and they must share in the solution of this problem.”[29]
______



NOTES
[1]
All Arabs Celebrate pro-phet’s Birthday. The New York Times, May 23, 1937.
Palestine Arabs outdid themselves today in celebrating Mouled el Nebi, the birthday of the .. Mohammed. Never before have there been such elaborate festivities, decorations and processions as throughout the country today…
Several days prior to the festival all buildings in Arab quarters were elaborately decorated, and pictures of Hitler, Mussolini and Fawzi el Kaoukgi, an Iraqian who came to Palestine during the disturbances last Summer to organize an “Arab revolt” were displayed. The government immediately ordered the removal of Fawzi el Kaoukgi’s picture.
[2]
‘”The Secular” Offshoots: The Baath Party and the PLO (Chapter 7).
Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012.
David Patterson.
Adel Soheil (2018). “The Iraqi Ba’th Regime’s Atrocities Against the Faylee Kurds Nation-State Formation Distorted.” p. 55.
[3]
Why Baathism was doomed – UnHerd.
R. Yassin-Kassab. Feb 27, 2025
[4]
‘How the Baath Party Influences the Islamic State.’
Stratfor, 13 Aug 2015.
[5]
Wistrich, Robert S.. A Lethal Obsession: Anti-Semitism from Antiquity to the Global Jihad. United Kingdom: Random House Publishing Group, 2010. Chapter 21: ‘The “Liberation” of Palestine.’
Morris, Benny. Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881-1999. United Kingdom: Knopf, 1999. p.65.
[6]
Janrense Boonstra, “Antisemitism, a History Portrayed”, SDU, Anne Frank Foundation,’ 1989, p. 101.
Elie Kedourie, Sylvia G. Haim: ‘Zionism and Arabism in Palestine and Israel’ (RLE Israel and Palestine), Taylor & Francis, 2015. p. 8.
[7]
Eliash, Shulamit. “THE TEMPLE MOUNT AS PART OF THE ARAB—JEWISH CONFLICT 1922—1933.” Tradition: A Journal of Orthodox Jewish Thought, vol. 26, no. 1, 1991, pp. 22–38. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23260700.
An excerpt from Falastin, an extremist pro-Mufti newspaper, in English translation, 13.11.1928, S25/2977, CZA.
[8]
The Palestine Bulletin⁩⁩, 16 February 1931. “Falastin and the Mufti.”
The Palestine Post⁩⁩, 21 April 1935.
The Palestine Post⁩, 11 June 1939⁩.
“‘Falastin’ – the Mufti’s Organ..”
[9]
“Noble[sic] Hitler” — Says “Falastin ” — The Palestine Post, 22 May 1933.
[10]
‘Arab Delegation to U.S. Made Financial Failure, Bendak Says.’ JTA, Sep 28, 1930
[11]
‘From Bethlehem to Paris Arab-christian Editor Goes to Get Nazi Instructions.’ JTA,
October 8, 1933.
[12]
Haiduc-Dale, N. (2013). Arab Christians in British Mandate Palestine: Communalism and Nationalism, 1917-1948. United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press.
p.81:
…the Islamic reform movement founded by figures such as Jamal al-Din al- Afghani, Rashid Rida and Muhammad ‘Abduh. The most famous and long- lasting organisation to emerge during that time period was the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, founded by Hasan al-Banna in 1928. The Brotherhood itself became directly involved in Palestine in the 1930s.The YMMA was ostensibly a social organisation and its branches were, according to Lesch, ‘relatively independent’ of the SMC and other Islamic institutions… while formally a nonpolitical organisation, many members of the YMMA took an active role in politics. In 1932, the government shut down the organisation’s Acre branch ‘owing to the Association’s complete departure from its avowed social, non-political objects’. And despite officially standing outside the nationalist rift, Lesch asserts that ‘their pan-Islamic anti-Christian tendencies were supported by such conservative (and anti- SMC) leaders as Sulaiman al- Taji al-Faruqi, former head of the National Party and editor of the newspaper al-Jami’a al-islamiyya’…
p.82:
Bandak took a different approach. Despite differences between the YMMA and the SMC, Bandak used similar arguments in defence of both Islamic institutions. As explained above, in his support of the SMC, Bandak accepted Islamic nationalism as a driving ideology for Palestinian Arabs of all religions. Bandak condemned what he called Filastin’s ‘disgusting attacks against the most important Islamic personalities in the country’, and he supported YMMA communal organisation, arguing that the group was defending Islam rather than attacking Christianity. He argued, in effect, that the SMC should participate in leading the nationalist movement because of its religious standing…
p.87:
… in an article in Sawt al-Shaʿb mirrored those found in Muslimowned papers. Bandak argued that ‘Arab Christians should be the first to recognise the rights of their Moslem Brethren over public positions and support them with the Government [even] though some Christian officials might suffer from the grant[ing] of Moslem demands …
‘Issa Basil Bandak: Pro Islamists over Christians, Nazi fan and “student” of its propaganda in 1933, Mufti’s ally in 1948’.
At Pipes, Jan 3, 2023.
[13]
‘Settlement’ in Palestine A Triumph For The ‘Axis”.
The Palestine Post, 13 July 1939, p. 6.
[14]
Anti-Jewish Activities of the Arabs in Argentine – DAIA, 1958. pp.18-9.
There he publishes ‘America y Oriente’ from November 20, 1952, “known for its systematical anti-Jewish campaign and its glorification of the totalitarian regimes, particularly of the nazi Germany.
[15]
‘Israel At the United Nations.’ By Saul Carson
The Canadian Jewish Chronicle, Aug 4, 1961, p. 5.
[16]
‘Nasser’s Anti-Jewish Propaganda.’ Publication Date:July 8, 1965. CIA
[17]
Nadeau, J. (2011). The Canadian Fuhrer: The Life of Adrien Arcand.Canada: James Lorimer Limited, Publishers, p. 351.
‘Extremism on the Right: A Handbook,’ Anti Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, 1983, p. 49.
(1979) National front reverse, Patterns of Prejudice, 13:2,26-27, DOI:10.1080/0031322X.1979.9969498.
“Swedish authorities’ action.”
The American Spectator. (1986). United States: American Spectator, p. 20.
The Nizkor Project.
The Australian Jewish Times, 7 April 1983. “Whitewashing Hitler” “Neo-Nazi Attempts to Rewrite History” The Australian Jewish News (Melbourne), 7 January 1983.
Seidel, G.(1986).The Holocaust denial : antisemitism, racism & the new right. United Kingdom: Beyond the Pale Collective, p. 28
[18]
National Lampoon. (1973). United States:(n.p.), p. 18.
Jewish Observer and Middle East Review, vol. 21, William Samuel & Company Limited, 1972, p. 7.
‘Behind The Scenes’.
B’nai B’rith Messenger, 17 November 1972, p. 34.
Dalin, D. (2017). Icon of Evil: Hitler’s Mufti and the Rise of Radical Islam. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis. p. 120
[19]
Manor, Y. (1984). Anti-Zionism. Israel: Department of Information, World Zionist Organization, p. 20.
[20]
‘Issa Nakhleh (1915-2003): A supposed “Christian” – After a long bloody Neo-Nazi career, he published a glorification of Islam, Muhammad.’
Oct 30, 2022 at Pipes.
[21]
Palestine Post, July 16, 1934.
‘TROUBLES IN GERMANY.
The following paragraph is taken from the Arab Federation, a Jerusalem weekly in English, dated July 7. The people of Palestine have been watching the recent troubles in Germany with great interest and keen.
They were astonished by the courageous quick actions of Hitler whom the Arabs admire very much.’
[22]
Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates… Volume 93, Part 11, United States Congress, 1947, pp.2819-2821.
[23]
‘Hashimites and Husseinis.’
By J. M. Japolsky (London). L l
The Sydney Jewish News, 4 March 1949.
[24]
Porath, Y. (2023). The Palestinian Arab National Movement, 1929-1939: From Riots to Rebellion. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, p.76
[25]
Morris, B. (2011). Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881-2001. United Kingdom: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, p.124.
[26]
Herf, J. (2022). Israel’s Moment: International Support for and Opposition to Establishing the Jewish State, 1945–1949. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, p. 108.
[27]
‘UNITED NATIONS: Overstatement.’
TIME, May 26, 1947.
Karsh, E. (2010). ‘Palestine Betrayed’. United States: Yale University Press. Ch.4 ‘The Road to Partition.’
Der Tog – דער טאג, 21 May 1947
Congress Weekly. (1951). United States: American Jewish Congress, p. 10.
“Ghoury defended the ex-Mufti, declaring he was a patriot and not really an enemy of Great Britain. He had the effrontery to compare the ex-Mufti with George Washington and added maliciously…”
[28]
UN Palestine Commission – Policy of the Mandatory Power in Palestine – Communication from the Jewish Agency for Palestine. Feb 20, 1948.
[29]
‘Nakba: A self inflicted catastrophe.’ Barry Shaw, The Jerusalem Post, May 20, 2011.
 
Last edited:
What's profoundly disturbing also about Islamofascist sheikh al-Faruqi, who was actually blind. Meaning he couldn't see a non-Arab a non-Muslim infidel... Yet full of hatred.
 
An Update on the “Islamo-Christian”
Why he continues to exist despite Islam's continued slaugher of Christians.

February 2, 2016 by Hugh Fitzgerald.

The phenomenon of the Islamo-Christian” deserves wider attention, and the word wider use. An “Islamo-Christian” is, in its strictest sense, a Christian Arab who identifies with and works to advance the Islamic agenda, out of fear or out of a belief that his “Arabness” requires loyalty to Islam. Islamization by the Arab Muslim conquerors of Mesopotamia, Syria, and North Africa was a vehicle for Arab imperialism. This imperialism, the most successful in human history, convinced those who accepted Islam to also forget their own pre-Islamic or non-Islamic pasts. It caused them, in many cases, to forget their own languages and to adopt Arabic — and in using Arabic, and in adopting Arabic names, within a few generations they had convinced themselves that they were Arabs.

Some held out. The Copts in Egypt today are simply the remnants of a population that was entirely Coptic, and that has suffered steady and slow asphyxiation. How many of Egypt’s Arabs are in fact Copts who fail to realize this, much less have any sympathy or interest in how their Coptic ancestors, out of intolerable pressure, assumed the identity of Arabs?

In Lebanon, the mountains provided a refuge for the Maronites, by far the most successful group to withstand the Muslims. And most Maronites are quick to make the important distinction that, while they are “users of Arabic,” that does not make them “Arabs.” When they claim that they predate the Arab invasion (which of course they do) and are the descendants of the previous inhabitants of Lebanon, the Phoenicians, they are greeted with ridicule. But why? Where did the Phoenicians go? Did they just disappear? It is far more plausible to believe that the Maronites and the others in Lebanon are, most of them (for how many real “Arabs” actually came from the Arabian peninsula to conquer far more numerous populations of non-Arabs?) the descendants of those Phoenicians. The Maronites recognize this; the Muslims do not, because for them the superior people, the people to whom the Qur’an was “given” and “in their language,” are the Arabs. The sense of Arab supremacy comes not only from the fact that the Qur’an was written in Arabic (with bits of Aramaic still floating in it), but because the Sunna, the other great guide for Muslims, consists of, and is derived from, the hadith and the sira, and reflects the life of people in 7th century Arabia.

Thus one sees the forcibly-converted descendants of Hindus, the Muslims of India and Pakistan, full of supposed “descendants of the Prophet” who are identified by the name “Sayeed.” It is as if, in the middle of a former British colony, say Uganda, black Africans gave themselves such names as Anthony Chenevix-ffrench or Charles Hardcastle, and dressed like remote Englishmen at Agincourt, or Ascot, and insisted, to one and all, that they were indeed lineal descendants of Elizabeth the Virgin Queen, or Hereward the Wake, or Ethelred the Unready.

Yet when those whose ancestors were forcibly converted to Islam (and force can be not military force, but the incessant and relentless pressure of dhimmitude, which will over time cause many to give up and embrace the belief-system of the oppressor) and adopted the names, and mimicked the dress and the manners and customs of Muslims — which are essentially those of a distant time and place (Arabia, more than a thousand years ago) — we do not smile or think it absurd. A few Muslim “intellectuals” in East Asia occasionally suggest that local customs and ways, even local expressions of music and art, ought not to be sacrificed to the Sunna of Islam, but to no avail.

And so strong is the power of Islam among the Arabs, so ingrained is their desire to ward off Muslim displeasure, that unless they do not feel themselves to be Arabs but a self-contained community (Copts, Maronites) that has managed to survive, they are very likely to reflect the Muslim views and promote the Muslim agenda.

Nowhere can this be seen better than among the “Palestinian” Arabs. Michel Sabbagh is only one example. The Sabbagh who gave $6.5 million to support John Esposito’s pro-Muslim empire at Georgetown was a “Christian.” (Note to James V. Schall: can you convince Georgetown’s administration to sever its now-embarrassing tie to Esposito? At some point he, and Georgetown, have to part ways, for the sake of Georgetown’s reputation and continued support from alumni.) The gun-running icon-stealing Archbishop Hilarion Cappucci was, in name, a Melkite Greek Catholic; he was, in his essence, a PLO supporter.

“Islamo-Christian” promoters of the Jihad — beginning with the Jihad against Israel — include a few “Palestinian” Presybterians who have carefully burrowed within, and risen within, the bureaucracy of the Presbyterian Church in America (no names here, but you can easily find them out), and Naim Ateek, who comes to delude audiences of Christians about the “Palestinian struggle” even as the Christian population of the “Palestinian” territories has plummeted, since Israel relinquished control, from 20% to 2% — out of fear of Muslim “Palestinians.”
Nor, of course, do Michel Sabbagh and his ilk pay much attention to the situation of Christians in the Sudan, or Indonesia, or Pakistan. Why would they? It would get in the way of their promotion of the Islamic attempt not only to reduce Israel to the dimensions that will allow them to go in for the final kill, but to seize control of the Holy Land. What, after all, do you think would happen to that Holy Land if Israel were to disappear? Do you think the Christian sites would be as scrupulously preserved? As available to pilgrims? Would Christians walk around Jerusalem if it were under the rule of Muslims with quite the same feelings of security that they do now?

*

The above is, in full, an article I wrote and published .. in 2005. Since I wrote it, the Christian communities of Iraq (Chaldeans, Assyrians) and Syria (Melkites, Orthodox, Roman Catholics) have been decimated; the Coptic community in Egypt been under continuous assault, and not only during the hyper-Islamic regime of Morsi; and Christians and churches have been attacked in Pakistan, the Philippines, and Indonesia by Muslims. And Muslim terrorists attack Infidel Christians in Dar al-Harb itself, in Paris and London and Amsterdam and Madrid and Moscow, as they have in New York, Washington, Boston, Fort Hood, and San Bernardino.

Given the past decade of Christian victims of Muslim despoliation and delirium — and with the list above I was just getting started — one might have assumed that the “Islamo-Christian” was no longer to be found. But just the other day, Gregory III Laham, the Melkite Greek Catholic Patriarch of Antioch, Alexandria, Jerusalem and All the East, surfaced to solemnly declare: “We, the Arab Christians, always defend Islam and our Muslim brothers – no one defends Islam like the Arab Christians do.” Robert Spencer took the good Gregory to task, pointing out that this classic encapsulation of the dhimmi phenomenon had never won the Melkites any special favors, and that they had suffered just as much from Muslim aggression when they parroted this kind of nonsense as they would have had the good Gregory tried verbally to smite the Muslims hip and thigh. Perhaps, Spencer suggested, the time for dhimmitude had long passed, it never having panned out, and it was time for assorted patriarchs of the East to try a different and truer tack — what, after all, did the Melkites at this point have to lose? How much worse could their situation be under the Muslim thumb than it already is? Perhaps, if he could break with the past, and come to his senses, the Melkite bishop might recognize his first duty: to warn his own flock, and to warn other Christians too, about Islam.
A second Christian who has had nothing but good things to say about Islam is one Craig Considine. He’s a mere lean lecturer in sociology, not so grand as Gregory, but even more obtuse. Not being an ethnic Arab, he doesn’t fit the strictest definition of the “Islamo-Christian,” but as a declared Christian (Roman Catholic) working full-time to defend and promote Islam — and to accuse Israel, unsurprisingly, of every possible crime — he deserves a place in the pantheon here. Craig Considine’s studies — he’s been burning the midnight oil for years — have revealed to him that “Christians and Muslims share a similar ‘jihad.’ This ‘jihad’ is one of non-violence, the love of humanity, the perfection of the soul, and the search for knowledge.”

This will come as a surprise to any Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus who, at many different times and in many different places, have been on the receiving end of that Muslim “non-violence, love of humanity, perfection of the soul, and search for knowledge.” It came as a surprise to me. It no doubt comes as a surprise to you. And as I can add nothing to Robert Spencer’s dismemberment of Considine, readers are directed to this death on the installment plan here and here and here and here.

The ability of people to deny an unpleasant reality can be impressive. Look at Patriarch Gregory. Look at Craig Considine. Be suitably impressed.

 
Some recent notable IslamoChristians. Arabs who prioritize Islamism and even support or at least are apologetic for Jihad.


* Hanan Ashrawi. Supporting jihadi terror

* Edward Said attacking orientalists and glorifying Islamism.

* Sirhan Sihan - the assassin of Bobby Kennedy;

* James Zogby - coming up with excuses for Jihad terror, or demanding media houldn’t call Islamic terrorism "Islamic."

* infamous fabricator Muther Isaac.
 
An Update on the “Islamo-Christian”
Why he continues to exist despite Islam's continued slaugher of Christians.

February 2, 2016 by Hugh Fitzgerald.

The phenomenon of the Islamo-Christian” deserves wider attention, and the word wider use. An “Islamo-Christian” is, in its strictest sense, a Christian Arab who identifies with and works to advance the Islamic agenda, out of fear or out of a belief that his “Arabness” requires loyalty to Islam. Islamization by the Arab Muslim conquerors of Mesopotamia, Syria, and North Africa was a vehicle for Arab imperialism. This imperialism, the most successful in human history, convinced those who accepted Islam to also forget their own pre-Islamic or non-Islamic pasts. It caused them, in many cases, to forget their own languages and to adopt Arabic — and in using Arabic, and in adopting Arabic names, within a few generations they had convinced themselves that they were Arabs.

Some held out. The Copts in Egypt today are simply the remnants of a population that was entirely Coptic, and that has suffered steady and slow asphyxiation. How many of Egypt’s Arabs are in fact Copts who fail to realize this, much less have any sympathy or interest in how their Coptic ancestors, out of intolerable pressure, assumed the identity of Arabs?

In Lebanon, the mountains provided a refuge for the Maronites, by far the most successful group to withstand the Muslims. And most Maronites are quick to make the important distinction that, while they are “users of Arabic,” that does not make them “Arabs.” When they claim that they predate the Arab invasion (which of course they do) and are the descendants of the previous inhabitants of Lebanon, the Phoenicians, they are greeted with ridicule. But why? Where did the Phoenicians go? Did they just disappear? It is far more plausible to believe that the Maronites and the others in Lebanon are, most of them (for how many real “Arabs” actually came from the Arabian peninsula to conquer far more numerous populations of non-Arabs?) the descendants of those Phoenicians. The Maronites recognize this; the Muslims do not, because for them the superior people, the people to whom the Qur’an was “given” and “in their language,” are the Arabs. The sense of Arab supremacy comes not only from the fact that the Qur’an was written in Arabic (with bits of Aramaic still floating in it), but because the Sunna, the other great guide for Muslims, consists of, and is derived from, the hadith and the sira, and reflects the life of people in 7th century Arabia.

Thus one sees the forcibly-converted descendants of Hindus, the Muslims of India and Pakistan, full of supposed “descendants of the Prophet” who are identified by the name “Sayeed.” It is as if, in the middle of a former British colony, say Uganda, black Africans gave themselves such names as Anthony Chenevix-ffrench or Charles Hardcastle, and dressed like remote Englishmen at Agincourt, or Ascot, and insisted, to one and all, that they were indeed lineal descendants of Elizabeth the Virgin Queen, or Hereward the Wake, or Ethelred the Unready.

Yet when those whose ancestors were forcibly converted to Islam (and force can be not military force, but the incessant and relentless pressure of dhimmitude, which will over time cause many to give up and embrace the belief-system of the oppressor) and adopted the names, and mimicked the dress and the manners and customs of Muslims — which are essentially those of a distant time and place (Arabia, more than a thousand years ago) — we do not smile or think it absurd. A few Muslim “intellectuals” in East Asia occasionally suggest that local customs and ways, even local expressions of music and art, ought not to be sacrificed to the Sunna of Islam, but to no avail.

And so strong is the power of Islam among the Arabs, so ingrained is their desire to ward off Muslim displeasure, that unless they do not feel themselves to be Arabs but a self-contained community (Copts, Maronites) that has managed to survive, they are very likely to reflect the Muslim views and promote the Muslim agenda.

Nowhere can this be seen better than among the “Palestinian” Arabs. Michel Sabbagh is only one example. The Sabbagh who gave $6.5 million to support John Esposito’s pro-Muslim empire at Georgetown was a “Christian.” (Note to James V. Schall: can you convince Georgetown’s administration to sever its now-embarrassing tie to Esposito? At some point he, and Georgetown, have to part ways, for the sake of Georgetown’s reputation and continued support from alumni.) The gun-running icon-stealing Archbishop Hilarion Cappucci was, in name, a Melkite Greek Catholic; he was, in his essence, a PLO supporter.

“Islamo-Christian” promoters of the Jihad — beginning with the Jihad against Israel — include a few “Palestinian” Presybterians who have carefully burrowed within, and risen within, the bureaucracy of the Presbyterian Church in America (no names here, but you can easily find them out), and Naim Ateek, who comes to delude audiences of Christians about the “Palestinian struggle” even as the Christian population of the “Palestinian” territories has plummeted, since Israel relinquished control, from 20% to 2% — out of fear of Muslim “Palestinians.”
Nor, of course, do Michel Sabbagh and his ilk pay much attention to the situation of Christians in the Sudan, or Indonesia, or Pakistan. Why would they? It would get in the way of their promotion of the Islamic attempt not only to reduce Israel to the dimensions that will allow them to go in for the final kill, but to seize control of the Holy Land. What, after all, do you think would happen to that Holy Land if Israel were to disappear? Do you think the Christian sites would be as scrupulously preserved? As available to pilgrims? Would Christians walk around Jerusalem if it were under the rule of Muslims with quite the same feelings of security that they do now?

*

The above is, in full, an article I wrote and published .. in 2005. Since I wrote it, the Christian communities of Iraq (Chaldeans, Assyrians) and Syria (Melkites, Orthodox, Roman Catholics) have been decimated; the Coptic community in Egypt been under continuous assault, and not only during the hyper-Islamic regime of Morsi; and Christians and churches have been attacked in Pakistan, the Philippines, and Indonesia by Muslims. And Muslim terrorists attack Infidel Christians in Dar al-Harb itself, in Paris and London and Amsterdam and Madrid and Moscow, as they have in New York, Washington, Boston, Fort Hood, and San Bernardino.

Given the past decade of Christian victims of Muslim despoliation and delirium — and with the list above I was just getting started — one might have assumed that the “Islamo-Christian” was no longer to be found. But just the other day, Gregory III Laham, the Melkite Greek Catholic Patriarch of Antioch, Alexandria, Jerusalem and All the East, surfaced to solemnly declare: “We, the Arab Christians, always defend Islam and our Muslim brothers – no one defends Islam like the Arab Christians do.” Robert Spencer took the good Gregory to task, pointing out that this classic encapsulation of the dhimmi phenomenon had never won the Melkites any special favors, and that they had suffered just as much from Muslim aggression when they parroted this kind of nonsense as they would have had the good Gregory tried verbally to smite the Muslims hip and thigh. Perhaps, Spencer suggested, the time for dhimmitude had long passed, it never having panned out, and it was time for assorted patriarchs of the East to try a different and truer tack — what, after all, did the Melkites at this point have to lose? How much worse could their situation be under the Muslim thumb than it already is? Perhaps, if he could break with the past, and come to his senses, the Melkite bishop might recognize his first duty: to warn his own flock, and to warn other Christians too, about Islam.
A second Christian who has had nothing but good things to say about Islam is one Craig Considine. He’s a mere lean lecturer in sociology, not so grand as Gregory, but even more obtuse. Not being an ethnic Arab, he doesn’t fit the strictest definition of the “Islamo-Christian,” but as a declared Christian (Roman Catholic) working full-time to defend and promote Islam — and to accuse Israel, unsurprisingly, of every possible crime — he deserves a place in the pantheon here. Craig Considine’s studies — he’s been burning the midnight oil for years — have revealed to him that “Christians and Muslims share a similar ‘jihad.’ This ‘jihad’ is one of non-violence, the love of humanity, the perfection of the soul, and the search for knowledge.”

This will come as a surprise to any Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus who, at many different times and in many different places, have been on the receiving end of that Muslim “non-violence, love of humanity, perfection of the soul, and search for knowledge.” It came as a surprise to me. It no doubt comes as a surprise to you. And as I can add nothing to Robert Spencer’s dismemberment of Considine, readers are directed to this death on the installment plan here and here and here and here.

The ability of people to deny an unpleasant reality can be impressive. Look at Patriarch Gregory. Look at Craig Considine. Be suitably impressed.

Most self professed "Jews" are descendants from converts of Edomite Jews, such as AshKeNAZI and Khazars. AlahShua (Christ) predicted that these converts of Edom would be twice the sons of hell(death) as the Edomites. Mathew 23:15
He also said all those who would not that I be their KIng; Bring them hither and slay them before Me. Luke 19:27
What is amazing is that, most self professed Christians worship the anti-Christs pretending to be Biblical Israel.
 
'F A K E S T I N I A N S'


Why the Term "Fakestinians" Resonates More Than Ever Since the Genocidal-Islamist October 7th Terrorist Massacre


Since the October 7th Hamas-led massacre—a genocidal, premeditated assault targeting Israeli civilians—the Palestinian narrative has been increasingly exposed as manipulative, deceptive, and rooted in distortion. The term “Fakestinians” has gained traction not as an attack on individual Arabs, but as a critique of a manufactured identity and a propaganda machine that fuels violence and global misinformation. Here's why:


1. Invented National Identity Rooted in Historical Revisionism


The majority of so-called “Palestinians” are descendants of relatively recent Arab immigrants who moved into the British Mandate of Palestine during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, attracted by economic opportunities under early Zionist development. The claim of indigenous status is not only historically baseless but is also weaponized politically to delegitimize the Jewish people's well-documented, indigenous connection to the Land of Israel.


2. Exploitation of Medical Cases for Propaganda


Images of severely ill children—often suffering from chronic or genetic conditions—are regularly circulated as if their suffering is solely due to Israeli actions. This manipulative tactic intentionally obscures the complexity of the situation, falsely presenting these children as emblematic of Gaza’s general population. It's a cynical ploy to galvanize emotional outrage against Israel.


3. Hospitals as Human Shields and Propaganda Hubs


Gaza’s hospitals are systematically used by Hamas not just for hiding military infrastructure—such as command centers and tunnels—but also as high-value media tools. When Israel targets legitimate military sites embedded in these hospitals, Hamas and sympathetic media outlets frame the response as an attack on civilians, deliberately ignoring the true military usage.


4. The “Gaza Health Ministry” – A Hamas Mouthpiece


Western media often quote casualty statistics from the so-called Gaza Health Ministry without context. In reality, this “ministry” is run by Hamas, a U.S.- and EU-designated terrorist organization. Their data is neither independently verified nor credible. Inflated and fabricated figures are systematically used to portray Israel as committing "genocide," despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.


5. Terrorists Masquerading as Journalists ("Jihournalists / Jiharnalists")


Numerous so-called journalists operating in Gaza have been exposed as either active members of Hamas or complicit sympathizers. They not only fail to report on Hamas abuses but also serve as propaganda amplifiers, shaping narratives that favor jihadist goals under the guise of objective reporting.


6. Hamas Sabotages Aid Efforts for Political Gain


Despite Israel and the U.S. facilitating humanitarian aid into Gaza, Hamas often intercepts, withholds, or redistributes supplies for its own fighters or to extort desperate civilians. Aid is turned into a tool of control and coercion—civilians are beaten, tortured, or even executed for accepting assistance without paying bribes to Hamas operatives.


7. Hamas’ Goal: Sacrifice Civilians for Global Sympathy


Captured documents and public statements reveal Hamas’ strategic calculation: the more Palestinians who die, the more pressure mounts on Israel internationally. Civilian suffering is intentionally manufactured to fuel outrage and prolong the conflict—civilians are cannon fodder in their “resistance,” with death viewed not as a tragedy, but a political asset.


8. The Expansion of the “Pallywood” Industry


The term “Pallywood” refers to staged or manipulated footage produced in the Palestinian territories to falsely depict Israeli aggression or atrocities. The sheer volume and sophistication of this content post-October 7 have reached new extremes. Entire narratives have been built on unverified videos, fake injuries, and staged scenes, all intended to portray Israel as the aggressor and whitewash Hamas crimes.


From Pallywood to Pallyweid promoting a fake genocide.


Excellent phraseplay—“From Pallywood to Pallyweid” sharpens the progression from staged propaganda to full-blown international deception.


From Pallywood to Pallyweid: The Manufacturing of a Fake Genocide


What started as Pallywood—a term describing staged or manipulated footage aimed at demonizing Israel—has now evolved into something far more dangerous and insidious: Pallyweid, the global amplification of the false claim that Israel is committing “genocide.”


This propaganda evolution didn’t happen in a vacuum. It was carefully cultivated by Hamas and its sympathizers through a multi-pronged disinformation campaign, strategically designed to:


  • Exploit human suffering (often manufactured or grossly exaggerated)
  • Spread unverifiable or outright false casualty numbers
* Flood media channels with emotionally manipulative content
* Mobilize global protests and academic institutions against Israel


The goal? To erode Israel’s legitimacy, obstruct its right to self-defense, and rally international pressure—not to protect Palestinians, but to protect Hamas and prolong the war.


Let’s be clear:
There is no genocide.
There is no ethnic cleansing.
There is a war—a war forced on Israel by a genocidal terrorist organization that openly calls for the extermination of Jews.


The true tragedy is that much of the world media, international bodies, and even Western academics have become unwitting—or willing—participants in this grotesque deception.


Pallyweid is not just fake news.
It’s fake genocide.
And it’s being weaponized to destroy the Middle East’s only democracy, while shielding one of the world’s most brutal terror regimes from accountability.


From Pallywood to Pallyweid: Fake Genocide Propaganda, Enabled by Terrorists and "Moderates" Alike


What began as Pallywood—staged and manipulated videos aimed at vilifying Israel—has now evolved into Pallyweid, a full-scale, global disinformation campaign that falsely brands Israel’s defensive war against terrorism as “genocide.”


But this isn’t just the work of Hamas.
It’s also actively enabled by the so-called "moderate" Palestinian Authority (PA)—a regime that talks peace to the West while promoting hate at home.


The PA: Supposed Moderates, Active Enablers


The Palestinian Authority:


*Echoes Hamas rhetoric in Arabic, even as it plays diplomat in English.


*Spreads false casualty figures sourced from the Hamas-controlled Gaza “Health Ministry.”


*Glorifies terrorists as martyrs, rewarding them and their families through the "pay-for-slay" system.


*Accuses Israel of so-called "genocide" in international forums, giving credibility to Hamas-led blood libels.


*Suppresses dissent, jails journalists, and quashes internal criticism that might expose its complicity or corruption.


*Partners with anti-Israel NGOs and UN bodies to file fabricated war crimes charges and delegitimize Israel’s right to defend itself.


The PA isn’t a counterweight to Hamas—it’s part of the same machinery.
They don’t oppose terrorism.
They co-brand with it.


Weaponizing Victimhood.


Together, Hamas and the PA have perfected the political weaponization of victimhood. By pushing a false narrative of genocide—Pallyweid—they redirect blame from their own abuse of the Palestinian people onto Israel, fueling antisemitism globally while sabotaging any hope of real peace.


This is not about defending Palestinian civilians.
It’s about shielding Palestinian leaders from accountability, even as they sacrifice their own people—literally—to serve an anti-Israel agenda.


The Real Genocide Threat.


Let’s be crystal clear:


* The only actors calling for actual genocide are Hamas and its allies.


* The only nation facing existential threats from every border is Israel.


* The only true “moderation” the PA demonstrates is in tone, not in action.


From Pallywood to Pallyweid, from terrorists to “moderates”—the machinery of lies is fully operational. And it’s time the world stopped buying it.


Conclusion: A Manufactured Identity Weaponized Against Israel
.


The Palestinian national identity, built on negation of Israel’s right to exist, relies heavily on lies, staged suffering, and martyrdom propaganda. The term “Fakestinians”, while provocative, underscores the extent to which this identity has been co-opted by jihadist leadership to further death, destruction, and delegitimization of the Jewish state. More than ever, the world must see through the smokescreen and hold accountable the real perpetrators of Gaza’s misery: Hamas, PIJ and its collaborators.


_

From *
 
Most self professed "Jews" are descendants from converts of Edomite Jews, such as AshKeNAZI ...
What "edomite" bs.


  • [*]Most Israelis are Middle Easterners, not European.

    *The "khazar" myth has been debunked.

    *Even if it were partially true, a Jewish convert is as much a Jew as a descendant and becomes Abraham's 'seed'.

    *In your lying hatred, you converted a Hebrew Bible (see below) word into "Nazi "
    (Jews after years of exile, residing in Europe were named as such for the domonant original region in the area)

Genesis 10:3:


And the sons of Gomer were Ashkenaz and Riphath and Togarmah
IMG-20250828-WA0000.webp

And you are not the first ignorant of the Bible to post here bs but using Christianity in the wrong way.
 
Last edited:
Debunking the Fake History of Palestine With Robert Spencer | Viktor Frankl Podcast.

Daniel Schonbuch.
Robert Spencer, one of the world’s leading experts on jihad, political Islam, and Middle Eastern affairs, joins Rabbi Daniel Schonbuch, LMFT, and Lori Fein, Esq. on The Viktor Frankl Podcast for an in-depth discussion about the rise of extremism, the threats facing Western democracies, and the urgent need for moral clarity in our time.
 
Kooky QATARlson (Tucker) always managed to "randomly" CAREFULLY "find "those
 
Debunking the Fake History of Palestine With Robert Spencer | Viktor Frankl Podcast.

Daniel Schonbuch.
Robert Spencer, one of the world’s leading experts on jihad, political Islam, and Middle Eastern affairs, joins Rabbi Daniel Schonbuch, LMFT, and Lori Fein, Esq. on The Viktor Frankl Podcast for an in-depth discussion about the rise of extremism, the threats facing Western democracies, and the urgent need for moral clarity in our time.

Thanks
 
There were no "Jews" until after the Vatican invented the letter 'J'.
Nor was there Jesus. Christians have been fooled Big Time, as they accept anti-Christs as almost Christian. The deluded Christians love calling the King of His Creation as GeeSus, a couple of Greek words meaning unfaithful seducing pig.
King Ion Hyrcanus invaded Edom and conquered it about 125 B.C. He offered the Edomites to live if they converted to the doctrines of Yehuda, which they gladly did. This allowed them to pretend to be of the Tribe of Yehuda until The Edomite Herod made became king, and when the Messiah was born, of course the Edomite King Herod did His best to get rid of the Messiah. Herod tore down the Temple and built His own temple, and eventually He sought, again to tear down and destroy the Messiah which He and His Pharisees & Saducees successfully slandered, tortured and murdered the Messiah.
They thought they killed Him, but they did not.
Those Paarisees & Saducees did as Christ prophesied: They went across land and sea to got converts who became twice the sons of hell as themselves.
Eventually there were 3 branches of the hellish game; Edom, Ashkenaz & Khazars, and probably others.

Now, most pseudo Christians consider the self professed "Jews" as almost Christian. and the essence of Biblical Israel.
 
There were no "Jews" until after the Vatican invented the letter 'J'.
..
The original is a Y but in Germanic languages it has been written with a J, and still pronounced like a Y ['Juden' prounced like 'Yuden']. From there it has developed in English along with the letter J "transferred", which in the English language it is then pronounced like the letter J.

Just like the name 'Jacob' has these same different pronunciations in Germanic vs English respectively.

Actually Jew, Yehudi comes from the biblical name Judah / Yehudah, who was born to Jacob through Leah - around 1704 BC. The meaning of the word means gratitude.

Genesis 29:35:
And she conceived again and bore a son, and she said, "This time, I will thank the Lord!" Therefore, she named him Judah, and [then] she stopped bearing.

The Israelites became known ALSO as the Jews since after the destruction of the First Temple. Some 587 or 586 before Jesus was born..

Your Quran also states that the land belongs to the Jews.

__

Daniel 3:12:

There are certain Jews whom thou hast set over the affairs of the province of Babylon, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego; these men, O king, have not regarded thee: they serve not thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up.

Esther 3: 2-6

2. And all the king's servants who were in the king's gate would kneel and prostrate themselves before Haman, for so had the king commanded concerning him, but Mordecai would neither kneel nor prostrate himself.
3. Then the king's servants who were in the king's gate, said to Mordecai, "Why do you disobey the king's orders?"
4. Now it came to pass when they said [this] to him daily, and he did not heed them, that they told [this] to Haman, to see whether Mordecai's words would stand up, for he had told them that he was a Jew.
5..And when Haman saw that Mordecai would neither kneel nor prostrate himself before him, Haman became full of wrath.
6But it seemed contemptible to him to lay hands on Mordecai alone, for they had told him Mordecai's nationality, and Haman sought to destroy all the Jews who were throughout Ahasuerus's entire kingdom, Mordecai's people.



Zecharia 8:23:

So said the Lord of Hosts: In those days, when ten men of all the languages of the nations shall take hold of the skirt of a Jewish man, saying, "Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you."

__


The whole "khazar" myth on a snall part if European Jews has been debunked. Besides, even if there are converts, they are automatically became just as any other Jews/Hebrews/Israelites through conversion . Most Jsraekis are Middle Eastern safardi

__

In Italian (which is derived from Roman language who conquered Jerusalem and destroyed the 2nd Temple), today Jews are called in both forums but mainly:
Ebrai (Hebrews)
 
Last edited:
The original is a Y but in Germanic languages it has been written with a J, and still pronounced like a Y ['Juden' prounced like 'Yuden']. From there it has developed in English along with the letter J "transferred", which in the English language it is then pronounced like the letter J.

Just like the name 'Jacob' has these same different pronunciations in Germanic vs English respectively.

Actually Jew, Yehudi comes from the biblical name Judah / Yehudah, who was born to Jacob through Leah - around 1704 BC. The meaning of the word means gratitude.

Genesis 29:35:
And she conceived again and bore a son, and she said, "This time, I will thank the Lord!" Therefore, she named him Judah, and [then] she stopped bearing.

The Israelites became known ALSO as the Jews since after the destruction of the First Temple. Some 587 or 586 before Jesus was born..

Your Quran also states that the land belongs to the Jews.

__

Daniel 3:12:

There are certain Jews whom thou hast set over the affairs of the province of Babylon, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego; these men, O king, have not regarded thee: they serve not thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up.

Esther 3: 2-6

2. And all the king's servants who were in the king's gate would kneel and prostrate themselves before Haman, for so had the king commanded concerning him, but Mordecai would neither kneel nor prostrate himself.
3. Then the king's servants who were in the king's gate, said to Mordecai, "Why do you disobey the king's orders?"
4. Now it came to pass when they said [this] to him daily, and he did not heed them, that they told [this] to Haman, to see whether Mordecai's words would stand up, for he had told them that he was a Jew.
5..And when Haman saw that Mordecai would neither kneel nor prostrate himself before him, Haman became full of wrath.
6But it seemed contemptible to him to lay hands on Mordecai alone, for they had told him Mordecai's nationality, and Haman sought to destroy all the Jews who were throughout Ahasuerus's entire kingdom, Mordecai's people.



Zecharia 8:23:

So said the Lord of Hosts: In those days, when ten men of all the languages of the nations shall take hold of the skirt of a Jewish man, saying, "Let us go with you, for we have heard that God is with you."

__


The whole "khazar" myth on a snall part if European Jews has been debunked. Besides, even if there are converts, they are automatically became just as any other Jews/Hebrews/Israelites through conversion . Most Jsraekis are Middle Eastern safardi

__

In Italian (which is derived from Roman language who conquered Jerusalem and destroyed the 2nd Temple), today Jews are called in both forums but mainly:
Ebrai (Hebrews)
All the "quotations" posted by Mr.
 
All the alleged "quotations" posted by Mr. FDR_Reagan are from sources published after the letter "J" became popular with publishers of Bibles and their translations.
They do not prove a thing, except how deluded almost all Christians, if not all Christians have become at some point in the last 500 years.

And, when folks pretend that Jew is the same as Yehuda, they are cruising for destruction.
 
Last edited:
Christians who have sided with the PRINCE of GOG in his pseudo-Zionist endeavor, are playing the role of Judas, and have accepted the enemies of Christ as brothers in the Lord as if they are “almost Christians.”

In doing this, they have confirmed these "Jews" in their desolating abomination and state of unbelief thus helping "Jews" and their victims into inevitable disaster.

GOG AND MAGOG has invaded the entire world with the blessings, “financial support and liturgical encouragement” of Christendom who “have truly dug their own ecclesiastical graves.”
 
15th post
Debunking the Fake History of Palestine With Robert Spencer | Viktor Frankl Podcast.

Daniel Schonbuch.
Robert Spencer, one of the world’s leading experts on jihad, political Islam, and Middle Eastern affairs, joins Rabbi Daniel Schonbuch, LMFT, and Lori Fein, Esq. on The Viktor Frankl Podcast for an in-depth discussion about the rise of extremism, the threats facing Western democracies, and the urgent need for moral clarity in our time.

Thank you for posting this
 
Hitler was too nice to the self professed Jews. He even had them in His military.
And it is likely that they participated in His assassination and creating a fake Hitler to over see the final destruction of Germany.
As for starvation among sequestered industrial workers; That was caused by Germanic British and USA mass fire bombing of German cities causing mass starvation in Germany because of destroyed bridges, food storage etc. Even Germans had to scramble for food and heat, many of which also died.

In Luke 19:27, Christ's Word/Proverb is recorded as "All those who would not that I be their King, bring them hither and slay them before Me."

In the Duoay Bible of 1609, the word Holocaust is used to define sacrifices as (burnt offerings). Those "burnt offerings" were often eaten by the priests.
 
NotYankee said:
Hitler was too nice to the self professed Jews. He even had them in His military.
...
"Nice to the Jews" like 6,000,000 weren't enough?

What do you mean by "even had them in the military" (he didn't have any real Jews there) as if it is not a favor for him?
There were not real Jews. Only a tiny percentage in their origins , and did it to save their families. They were basically 75-95 non Jewish in their ethnicity. And most importantly, they
(fake 150,000) [15,000] did not consider themselves as Jews
1000007103.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom