Is Wikipedia politically biased? You tell me

[notmyfault2020]

Here is what it says about McCarthy (biog)

After Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election, McCarthy supported Trump's false denial of Biden's victory and participated in efforts to overturn the results,[7][8] and while he condemned the January 6 United States Capitol attack in its immediate aftermath, blaming Trump for the riot and saying the 2020 election was legitimate,[9][10] he would later walk back these comments and reconcile with Trump.

Kevin McCarthy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bias? What bias?

Here come the liberals saying I'm crazy (like all conservatives)

 

[basquebromance]

well, it is not the most reliable source of news. in my case, i read a lot of media and social media from all sides, but i never cared much for wikipedia. i mostly use it when i want to search random trivia about my favorite celebs

 

[JGalt]

Yes, Wikipedia is dripping wtih liberal bias. The Pope is also Catholic, water is wet, and fire is hot.

 

[notmyfault2020]

Yes, Wikipedia is dripping wtih liberal bias. The Pope is also Catholic, water is wet, and fire is hot.

and most Americans think the dottering, baby killing, America hating............ is doing a fair job

 

[miketx]

Of course it is leftist scum.

 

[notmyfault2020]

I hope they got that Let's Re-do the 2020 Election thing correct! (They say McC resisted the 2020 takeover )

If I'd known that, I would never have been against McC much... I still don't like how he voted a few times but hey... I love people who know the truth about 2020 and wanted to do something to correct the DISASTER ...

 

[pknopp]

That's pretty much what happened. Sadly many think stating things factually is a bias.

 

[BWK]

Here is what it says about McCarthy (biog)

After Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election, McCarthy supported Trump's false denial of Biden's victory and participated in efforts to overturn the results,[7][8] and while he condemned the January 6 United States Capitol attack in its immediate aftermath, blaming Trump for the riot and saying the 2020 election was legitimate,[9][10] he would later walk back these comments and reconcile with Trump.

Kevin McCarthy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bias? What bias?

Here come the liberals saying I'm crazy (like all conservatives)

No bias, just straight up undeniable facts, unless you are a big supporter of alternative facts.

 

[notmyfault2020]

well, it is not the most reliable source of news.

Hmmm.. so you're an election denier?

Better election denier than truth and reality denier.

 

[BULLDOG]

Here is what it says about McCarthy (biog)

After Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election, McCarthy supported Trump's false denial of Biden's victory and participated in efforts to overturn the results,[7][8] and while he condemned the January 6 United States Capitol attack in its immediate aftermath, blaming Trump for the riot and saying the 2020 election was legitimate,[9][10] he would later walk back these comments and reconcile with Trump.

Kevin McCarthy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bias? What bias?

Here come the liberals saying I'm crazy (like all conservatives)

Which part of the quote in the OP do you think is wrong? McCarthy even thanked trump for his part in the speakership election.

 

[notmyfault2020]

No bias, just straight up undeniable facts, unless you are a big supporter of alternative facts.

The irony meter has gone berzerk!!

 

[notmyfault2020]

Which part of the quote in the OP do you think is wrong? McCarthy even thanked trump for his part in the speakership election.

you know.. I just figure these days... if you have to explain such things to someone, that someone is either a totally dishonest person, hasn't been following news (real news) or both...

when u feel u have to make a 10 page explanation, you probably don't have to make a 10 page explanation bc the person is just not going to get it anyway..........

 

[BWK]

and most Americans think the dottering, baby killing, America hating............ is doing a fair job

Look up Wikipedia and see if there is anything in there about abortions and baby killing. There's Wikipedia and then there is yours with nothing to back up your claims. And you want to talk about bias. LOL! That's a god one.

 

[pknopp]

you know.. I just figure these days... if you have to explain such things to someone, that someone is either a totally dishonest person, hasn't been following news (real news) or both...

when u feel u have to make a 10 page explanation, you probably don't have to make a 10 page explanation bc the person is just not going to get it anyway..........

We get it. You want the facts to be whitewashed.

 

[White 6]

Here is what it says about McCarthy (biog)

After Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election, McCarthy supported Trump's false denial of Biden's victory and participated in efforts to overturn the results,[7][8] and while he condemned the January 6 United States Capitol attack in its immediate aftermath, blaming Trump for the riot and saying the 2020 election was legitimate,[9][10] he would later walk back these comments and reconcile with Trump.

Kevin McCarthy - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Bias? What bias?

Here come the liberals saying I'm crazy (like all conservatives)

Nope. Sounds pretty accurate.

 

[miketx]

Which part of the quote in the OP do you think is wrong? McCarthy even thanked trump for his part in the speakership election.

Which should tell you trump is still calling the shots. And THAT is what terrifies you howler monkeys.

 

[BWK]

The irony meter has gone berzerk!!

Even in your own thread you can't defend it with an intelligent come back. Buddy boy, you are the ultimate fail. Try again. Throwing it all back on me is for cowards and ignoramuses.

 

[BWK]

Which should tell you trump is still calling the shots. And THAT is what terrifies you howler monkeys.

A criminal calling the shots, and you admire that? Damn son, where's your self respect?

 

[BULLDOG]

you know.. I just figure these days... if you have to explain such things to someone, that someone is either a totally dishonest person, hasn't been following news (real news) or both...

when u feel u have to make a 10 page explanation, you probably don't have to make a 10 page explanation bc the person is just not going to get it anyway..........

It was a simple question. Which part do you think is untrue?

 

[BWK]

you know.. I just figure these days... if you have to explain such things to someone, that someone is either a totally dishonest person, hasn't been following news (real news) or both...

when u feel u have to make a 10 page explanation, you probably don't have to make a 10 page explanation bc the person is just not going to get it anyway..........

So, you can't answer the question. Enough said.