Is This Attempted Murder?

This piece of work tried to take away Trump's security detail.

Is this attempted murder?


Did it pass the Republican Congress. Nope.
It is kind of like indictments. You can indict a ham sandwich, but no matter. It is still just a ham sandwich.
 
Did it pass the Republican Congress. Nope.
It is kind of like indictments. You can indict a ham sandwich, but no matter. It is still just a ham sandwich.
This POS tried doing it shortly before the first assassination attempt.

What they ended up doing was filling his detail with untrained Homeland Security agents.

So it's no stretch to think he wanted Trump to get killed.
 
This POS tried doing it shortly before the first assassination attempt.

What they ended up doing was filling his detail with untrained Homeland Security agents.

So it's no stretch to think he wanted Trump to get killed.
.

I believe that President Trump has his own very dedicated security.

Do you think that July 13 was the first attempt on his life?


.
 
.

I believe that President Trump has his own very dedicated security.

Do you think that July 13 was the first attempt on his life?


.
No.....there have been several. But the shooting was the first one to get off a shot at him.
 
This POS tried doing it shortly before the first assassination attempt.

What they ended up doing was filling his detail with untrained Homeland Security agents.

So it's no stretch to think he wanted Trump to get killed.
Nothing provable though. Did he go after the security details for Obama, Bush and Clinton, or just Trump?
No congress would entertain such a bill, nor would the Senate, and certainly not a President leaving or entering office. Just political BS.
 
This POS tried doing it shortly before the first assassination attempt.

What they ended up doing was filling his detail with untrained Homeland Security agents.

So it's no stretch to think he wanted Trump to get killed.
Yep ...he knew it was coming....bears investigation I think.
 
Nothing provable though. Did he go after the security details for Obama, Bush and Clinton, or just Trump?
No congress would entertain such a bill, nor would the Senate, and certainly not a President leaving or entering office. Just political BS.
They're trying to secure their communications so they can find out what was going on.
The Jan 6th Committee is running scared right now, because they know they did things that are at the very least felonies.
They aren't safe because too many people know exactly what was going on, and could roll-over on everyone else.
Just ask Hillary.
 
This piece of work tried to take away Trump's security detail.
Is this attempted murder?

I wish people would give some DETAILS of things they start threads about instead of just a link to X. X no longer loads on my Firefox web browser and now I don't even get anything with Safari on this particular post.
 
Nothing provable though. Did he go after the security details for Obama, Bush and Clinton, or just Trump?
No congress would entertain such a bill, nor would the Senate, and certainly not a President leaving or entering office. Just political BS.
None of them are indicted criminal insurrectionists.
 
They're trying to secure their communications so they can find out what was going on.
The Jan 6th Committee is running scared right now, because they know they did things that are at the very least felonies.
They aren't safe because too many people know exactly what was going on, and could roll-over on everyone else.
Just ask Hillary.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, sure Mac, let me know when the trials or military tribunals start.:bigbed:
 
I wish people would give some DETAILS of things they start threads about instead of just a link to X.

This board is notorious for that.

I think flac, to his credit, was probably the last one who actually tried to maintain some semblance of the practice of informative topical content.

These days there's very, very little effort put into topical content.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, yeah, yeah, sure Mac, let me know when the trials or military tribunals start.:bigbed:
I won't have to. They'll be announced when they're ready to indict.

You might want to learn to stop believing the media.....because that's the only thing keeping these people out of jail.

I don't believe 90% of that garbage that passes as news these days.

For years I respected GWB, until Glenn Beck said Bush told him that he wasn't really in charge.
 
This piece of work tried to take away Trump's security detail.

Is this attempted murder?


No its not attempted murder, and the bill was introduced in April, before Trump became a convicted felon.

His proposal was only to removed SS protective detail while a Felon is serving their conviction in prison, and under the protection of other law enforcement.





Posted inNews

Thompson Says Secret Service Bill Wouldn’t Have Stripped Trump of Protection​

Ashton Pittman
by Ashton PittmanJuly 16, 2024
A man in a grey suit is seated behind a plate that reads Mr. Thompson speaking at a mic
U.S. House Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said on Tuesday, July 16, 2024, that his bill to strip Secret Service protections from convicted felons who are serving prison sentences would not have left former President Donald Trump unprotected. “My bill would not have affected the Secret Service's presence during this tragic event,” he said, referring to the shooting at a Trump rally on Saturday, July 13, 2024. AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, File



U.S. House Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, says former President Donald Trump would not have been unprotected during the campaign rally where a shooter fired at him even if a bill he introduced earlier this year to strip Secret Service protection from convicted and imprisoned felons had become law.

Several Republicans have heavily criticized or even called for the congressman to resign since the shooting, citing the bill that Thompson introduced in April. Trump, whom a New York jury convicted on 34 state felony charges in May, could potentially face a prison sentence.

In a statement his office shared with the Mississippi Free Press on Tuesday morning, Thompson said his bill would not have made a difference even if it had been law at the time of the rally.
“My bill would not have affected the Secret Service’s presence during this tragic event. It aims to clarify lines of authority when a protectee is sentenced to prison and is in the custody of another law enforcement agency,” the congressman said.
 
I won't have to. They'll be announced when they're ready to indict.

You might want to learn to stop believing the media.....because that's the only thing keeping these people out of jail.

I don't believe 90% of that garbage that passes as news these days.

For years I respected GWB, until Glenn Beck said Bush told him that he wasn't really in charge.
I am sure, i will be entertained or find some other entertainment.

You think the media is keeping that congressman out of Jail and want me to not watch it? You may need a keeper soon.

Most of it true, no matter how much it sucks.

So, your poor judgement, went all the way back to the George Son-ov-a-Bush days? Sad. I had no trouble at all, knowing he was a dipshit, getting friends killed for nothing in Iraq. I knew not to vote for him the first time and it didn't take the media for me to figure it out.
 
No its not attempted murder, and the bill was introduced in April, before Trump became a convicted felon.

His proposal was only to removed SS protective detail while a Felon is serving their conviction in prison, and under the protection of other law enforcement.





Posted inNews

Thompson Says Secret Service Bill Wouldn’t Have Stripped Trump of Protection​

Ashton Pittman
by Ashton PittmanJuly 16, 2024
A man in a grey suit is seated behind a plate that reads Mr. Thompson speaking at a mic
U.S. House Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said on Tuesday, July 16, 2024, that his bill to strip Secret Service protections from convicted felons who are serving prison sentences would not have left former President Donald Trump unprotected. “My bill would not have affected the Secret Service's presence during this tragic event,” he said, referring to the shooting at a Trump rally on Saturday, July 13, 2024. AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, File



U.S. House Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, says former President Donald Trump would not have been unprotected during the campaign rally where a shooter fired at him even if a bill he introduced earlier this year to strip Secret Service protection from convicted and imprisoned felons had become law.

Several Republicans have heavily criticized or even called for the congressman to resign since the shooting, citing the bill that Thompson introduced in April. Trump, whom a New York jury convicted on 34 state felony charges in May, could potentially face a prison sentence.

In a statement his office shared with the Mississippi Free Press on Tuesday morning, Thompson said his bill would not have made a difference even if it had been law at the time of the rally.
“My bill would not have affected the Secret Service’s presence during this tragic event. It aims to clarify lines of authority when a protectee is sentenced to prison and is in the custody of another law enforcement agency,” the congressman said.
That was the excuse.............but seeing as how this douchebag knows Trump wasn't guilty, it's a criminal conspiracy.
 
Back
Top Bottom