Is There ANY Argument That We'd Be Better If Kamala Had Won???

[Man With A Plan]

It would have if he had kept the sky high tariff rates he had announced and then chickened out of.

Every time he pauses tariffs, which he’s done a lot, it delays the onset of inflation.

You really don't grasp how negotiations work...do you, Marener?

 

[Man With A Plan]

Because Trump is all about media attention and headlines. The announcements are enough. Follow through doesn’t really matter. Foreign countries know this.

That was a pretty straight forward question, Marener. Why couldn't you answer it?

 

[Marener]

You really don't grasp how negotiations work...do you, Marener?

Foreign nations seem to understand how negotiations work for Trump and what he actually wants.

Notice how these promises aren’t obligations.

 

[Rawley]

What’s hyper partisan and “bigoted” about thinking that the president is overstepping his authority on tariffs?

Because you and your ilk didn't say squat when your stooge implemented tariffs.

You guys just say shit because you don’t have an actual argument.

Backatcha

 

[Hafar1014]

Here is comprehensive list of Kamalas accomplishments

 

[M14 Shooter]

Here is comprehensive list of Kamalas accomplishments

Yes, but only because she's a colored woman.
if not, she'd have fewer.

 

[Marener]

That was a pretty straight forward question, Marener. Why couldn't you answer it?

Japan expects only 1% to 2% of $550 billion U.S. fund to be investment

The bulk of the fund, agreed as part of Japan's trade deal with the U.S., will consist of loans, says chief tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa.

www.japantimes.co.jp

Take for instance the big splashy announcement of Japan investing $550 billion.

It’s actually almost entirely loans, and not even obligations at all.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Here is comprehensive list of Kamalas accomplishments

I wonder if she has any regrets basically selling herself to promote her "career"

 

[Marener]

Because you and your ilk didn't say squat when your stooge implemented tariffs.

It’s absurd to compare the tariffs applied during the Biden administration to the tariffs applied during the Trump administration. The breadth and scale are dramatically different.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Foreign nations seem to understand how negotiations work for Trump and what he actually wants.

Notice how these promises aren’t obligations.

The first intelligent thing you've said this morning, Marener! You're right, foreign nations DO seem to understand how negotiations work for Trump and what he wants. It's why he got the trade deals and the investment pledges that he's gotten!

Promises are not obligations but when you make them to someone that you know is going to be in power for another 3 1/2 years...that promise becomes something that you really don't want to break.

 

[Marener]

The first intelligent thing you've said this morning, Marener! You're right, foreign nations DO seem to understand how negotiations work for Trump and what he wants. It's why he got the trade deals and the investment pledges that he's gotten!

Promises are not obligations but when you make them to someone that you know is going to be in power for another 3 1/2 years...that promise becomes something that you really don't want to break.

Why would Trump care if the investment never really happens? Trump for the headline. That’s enough for him.

 

[Rawley]

It’s absurd to compare the tariffs applied during the Biden administration to the tariffs applied during the Trump administration. The breadth and scale are dramatically different.

LOL So your argument is that Biden's tariffs were hunky dory and Trump are absurd. Solid legal reasoning there counselor, rock solid.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Why would Trump care if the investment never really happens? Trump for the headline. That’s enough for him.

Trump's all about the deal. He likes to win. That's what he's all about. The headline is just an acknowledgement of the win.

 

[Marener]

LOL So your argument is that Biden's tariffs were hunky dory and Trump are absurd. Solid legal reasoning there counselor, rock solid.

Yes. Tariffs can be legal in some circumstances and not legal in other circumstances.

Sorry that’s hard for you to understand.

 

[Hafar1014]

LOL So your argument is that Biden's tariffs were hunky dory and Trump are absurd. Solid legal reasoning there counselor, rock solid.

Bidens tariffs were Trumps tariffs weren't they?

 

[Marener]

Trump's all about the deal. He likes to win. That's what he's all about. The headline is just an acknowledgement of the win.

Headline are the win. The rest is irrelevant.

 

[Rawley]

Yes. Tariffs can be legal in some circumstances and not legal in other circumstances.

Sorry that’s hard for you to understand.

Understand completely. Your stooge implemented the harshest tariffs ever on the world's second largest economy, but Trump's are illegal, because .... Orangeman bad?

Rock solid logic there counselor, rock solid.,

 

[Marener]

Bidens tariffs were Trumps tariffs weren't they?

There were a number of targeted tariffs on Chinese goods, but the huge baseline tariffs on the entire world are all Trump.

 

[Rawley]

Bidens tariffs were Trumps tariffs weren't they?

Nope. He issued new ones and cranked them up. Mare and his fellow cultists didn't say peep.

 

[Marener]

Understand completely. Your stooge implemented the harshest tariffs ever on the world's second largest economy, but Trump's are illegal, because .... Orangeman bad?

Rock solid logic there counselor, rock solid.,

Trump’s tariffs are far harsher than Biden, by an order of magnitude.

Trump is applying a tariff to basically every country in the world. What gives him the authority to do so?