Is the peace process inherently flawed by a lack of understanding of Israel?

So what?

Israel doesn't have to grant rights to arabs who aren't even in Israel.

funny, they have no problem removing rights for arabs that "don't live in israel".

:rolleyes:

face it, the ONLY solution to the israel/palestine conflict is a single state where both peoples are commonly validated. I don't care if your kind think that a majority of non-jews would destroy (a jewish) israel. ethnic equality ONLY sucks for those who fear giving up their dominance. Until your kind realize that you are not the only people on that land with a history there you'll find yourselves having to continue debasing non-jews in order to perpetuate history's latest example of cultural racism, ironically.
 
I've quotes a source, jew boy. where is yours?

oh.. THATS right. you don't have one other than some broken record bullshit.


The fact is the the knesset established an official law of return for jews in israel AFTER the creation of israel. So, no throwing off blame at the league of nations, jew boy.

tsk tsk tsk.

You have less than zero knowledge of the subject matter, as I have demonstrated, and you become agitated.

Googling Wikipedia does not constitute knowledge.

The right of return was established by the League of Nations in 1922 in its ratification of the binding Palestine Mandate.

I just ripped you another asshole. Enjoy it, midget?



Without evidence you've only demonstrated how retarded you are. Sucks that the facts don't line up with your bullshit agenda, eh jew?

I posted my evidence. Where is yours?

:rofl:

The evidence proves him wrong that is why he won't post it.
 
*yawn*


got anything else in that jewbag of yours today, lampshade?

Sucks Muhammad was a pedophile married to a 6 year old little girl, eh, dildo?

You'll have to ask someone who gives a shit about Mohammed, Jew. But, at least we know not to leave any wine and nubile daughters around your jewish ass, eh Lot?

As a student of The Hebrew Bible, I must tell you that Lot was not a Hebrew. Lot did not want to follow in his uncle Abraham's righteous ways, so that is why he separated from him and went to live in the evil city of Sodom. While they escaped from the wicked city, in Rabbinic lore, Lot and his family are considered to be only a slight cut above wicked themselves. That is why G-d turned Lot's wife into a pillar of salt, and that is why Lot slept with his daughters. In fact, the incestuous relationship alluded to in this thread, explains the origins of the Hebrews' 2 worst enemies, the child-sacrificing and idolatrous nations of Moab and Ammon. I suggest you watch "The Story of Ruth" (1960), a movie about the only decent offspring of these 2 wicked nations that issued from the non-Hebrew Lot.
 
Even Allah says Palestine is the Jewish Holy Land...

Quran 17:104---

This passage is talking about the return of the Jews to Jerusalem after the first warning to behave themselves.

You are avoiding the rest - what happened after the last (second) warning in your own quote came to pass?

Qu'ran tells us:



and furthermore

17:8 It may be that your Lord may (yet) show Mercy unto you; but if ye revert (to your sins), We shall revert (to Our punishments): And we have made Hell a prison for those who reject (all Faith).

Your cherry-picked passage completely ignores the context.

Jews lived in Jerusalem for thousands of years before your pedophile fake prophet was even hatched, Habib.

Your psychotic leader was laughed out of Mecca by his own people when he concocted his bullshit fairy tale about his night journey to Jerusalem aboard his winged mule with the woman's head and peacock's tail.

What a bogus religion.

Except for the fact that Jerusalem is not even specified as the location of Muhammed's Night Journey. While Jerusalem is named over 700 times in the Hebrew Bible, it's not even mentioned once in the Quran.
 
Who gives a fig who inhabited Jeruselum a thousand...a hundred or whatever years ago? What matters is what is occuring in living memory.

Otherwise, North America should be returned to a number of indiginous tribes.
 
So what?

Israel doesn't have to grant rights to arabs who aren't even in Israel.

funny, they have no problem removing rights for arabs that "don't live in israel".

:rolleyes:

face it, the ONLY solution to the israel/palestine conflict is a single state where both peoples are commonly validated. I don't care if your kind think that a majority of non-jews would destroy (a jewish) israel. ethnic equality ONLY sucks for those who fear giving up their dominance. Until your kind realize that you are not the only people on that land with a history there you'll find yourselves having to continue debasing non-jews in order to perpetuate history's latest example of cultural racism, ironically.

Israeli Arabs are constitutionally guaranteed equal rights, dummy.

Arabs in Arab countries, however, have zero rights.
 
Who gives a fig who inhabited Jeruselum a thousand...a hundred or whatever years ago? What matters is what is occuring in living memory.

Otherwise, North America should be returned to a number of indiginous tribes.

The US Congress passed the Jerusalem Embassy Act in 1995 acknowledging Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the Jewish people.

Jerusalem has no religious significance to Muslims.
 
Who gives a fig who inhabited Jeruselum a thousand...a hundred or whatever years ago? What matters is what is occuring in living memory.

Otherwise, North America should be returned to a number of indiginous tribes.

The US Congress passed the Jerusalem Embassy Act in 1995 acknowledging Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the Jewish people.

Jerusalem has no religious significance to Muslims.

Irrelevant. The US has no authority there.
 
Who gives a fig who inhabited Jeruselum a thousand...a hundred or whatever years ago? What matters is what is occuring in living memory.

Otherwise, North America should be returned to a number of indiginous tribes.

The US Congress passed the Jerusalem Embassy Act in 1995 acknowledging Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the Jewish people.

Jerusalem has no religious significance to Muslims.

Irrelevant. The US has no authority there.

Relevant, mental patient. The US Congress acknowledges the historical and legal connection between Jerusalem and the Jewish people.

Take your schizophrenia medication
 
The US Congress passed the Jerusalem Embassy Act in 1995 acknowledging Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the Jewish people.

Jerusalem has no religious significance to Muslims.

Irrelevant. The US has no authority there.

Relevant, mental patient. The US Congress acknowledges the historical and legal connection between Jerusalem and the Jewish people.

Take your schizophrenia medication

So? They still have no authority there.
 
The United States has withheld recognition of the city as Israel's capital. The proposed law was adopted by the Senate (93-5),[3] and the House (374-37).[4]

Since passage, the law has never been implemented, because of opposition from Presidents Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama, who view it as a Congressional infringement on the Executive Branch’s constitutional authority over foreign policy; they have consistently claimed the presidential waiver on national security interests.
Jerusalem Embassy Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
The United States has withheld recognition of the city as Israel's capital. The proposed law was adopted by the Senate (93-5),[3] and the House (374-37).[4]

Since passage, the law has never been implemented, because of opposition from Presidents Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama, who view it as a Congressional infringement on the Executive Branch’s constitutional authority over foreign policy; they have consistently claimed the presidential waiver on national security interests.
Jerusalem Embassy Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Jerusalem Embassy Act is US law.

Now, you know, Jose. Is Spain still bankrupt?
 
The United States has withheld recognition of the city as Israel's capital. The proposed law was adopted by the Senate (93-5),[3] and the House (374-37).[4]

Since passage, the law has never been implemented, because of opposition from Presidents Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama, who view it as a Congressional infringement on the Executive Branch’s constitutional authority over foreign policy; they have consistently claimed the presidential waiver on national security interests.
Jerusalem Embassy Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Jerusalem Embassy Act is US law.

Now, you know, Jose. Is Spain still bankrupt?

It still does not matter. The US has no authority there.
 

Forum List

Back
Top