Is the Motor Voter Law Constitutional?

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
153,202
Reaction score
78,447
Points
2,645
Passed in 1993 and enacted in 1995 the National Voter Registration Act allows anyone with a driver’s license, irrespective of the citizenship, to be able to register to vote

While certain aspects have been challenged, has the overall fundamental unfairness and disenfranchisement of US citizens having their votes canceled by Illegal Aliens ever been challenged at SCOTUS?

The Senate recently tried to restrict voting solely to US Citizens and the entire democrat Party voted against it

I saw that AZ and OH challenged aspects of the law at SCOTUS, but has the entire Act ever been challenged as Unconstitutional?
 
Passed in 1993 and enacted in 1995 the National Voter Registration Act allows anyone with a driver’s license, irrespective of the citizenship, to be able to register to vote

While certain aspects have been challenged, has the overall fundamental unfairness and disenfranchisement of US citizens having their votes canceled by Illegal Aliens ever been challenged at SCOTUS?

The Senate recently tried to restrict voting solely to US Citizens and the entire democrat Party voted against it

I saw that AZ and OH challenged aspects of the law at SCOTUS, but has the entire Act ever been challenged as Unconstitutional?
No Illegal Aliens vote in Federal Election.

They can only vote for local officials.
 
No Illegal Aliens vote in Federal Election.

They can only vote for local officials.
That’s hilarious!!

Let’s get a Federal database of US citizens by county and compare to votes in Federal elections, shall we?
 
Passed in 1993 and enacted in 1995 the National Voter Registration Act allows anyone with a driver’s license, irrespective of the citizenship, to be able to register to vote

That is not what the law does.

All the law does is require state motor vehicle offices to provide an opportunity for voter registration to anyone at the same time that they apply for a new or renewed driver's license or state identification card, and to require the state to forward the completed application to the appropriate state or local election official.

Just because someone puts in an application does not mean they are registered.
 
That is not what the law does.

All the law does is require state motor vehicle offices to provide an opportunity for voter registration to anyone at the same time that they apply for a new or renewed driver's license or state identification card, and to require the state to forward the completed application to the appropriate state or local election official.

Just because someone puts in an application does not mean they are registered.

Sure!

So let's get a Federal database of US citizens by county and compare to votes in Federal elections, shall we?
 
Individuals should have to register to vote.

WW
 
That is also stupid, it is not required, nor should it be. If someone does not want to vote, they should not be made to do so

That has nothing to do with, nor does it imply, "required to vote". It speaks to the registration process to be recognized as eligible to vote.

WW
 
PREMISE:
The current model of “voter” registration is a carryover from the British system established during the birth of our country was based on a time when:
  • The main mode of transportation was shanks mare (feet)
  • Cargo was moved by horse drawn wagons
  • It could take days and multiple riders for information to travel from the State Capital to any point in the state and weeks if information needed to move from one end of the country to another (say Maine to Florida). As the country expanded that time could be measured in months (east coast to west coast).
During those times the idea of “Voter Registration” being localized made sense as the vast majority of the population was born, lived, and died in the same 100 mile circle.

That time is passed, we now live in the age of a highly mobile society with instant communications. Hell sitting here on the east coast I can pick up a phone, punch in a few numbers and be talking with my daughter stationed in Japan.

RECOMMENDATION:
Therefore I think it’s time to fundamentally change the core concept of “Voter Registration” from the current model of registering to vote and having to prove you are eligible to being automatically an eligible voter unless the franchised is removed for a reason (felony, death, mental incapacity, etc.).

This fundamental shift from “having to register to vote” to “eligible voter” would be based on the integration of various sources of information into a central clearing house that all states would be required to participate in for election for federal offices. If they decided to maintain a separate parallel system for state/local elections, they would be free to do so.

All eligible citizens are fundamentally considered “registered to vote” as long as they are of the correct age and have not had their franchise removed. So it becomes less a question of “who” is eligible to vote, the only remaining question is “where” they are eligible to vote.

This “Voter Electronic Eligibility Center” system would include:
  • Real time access to voter eligibility information via an encrypted secure network to state and local boards of election.
  • State and local boards would be able to download voters whose address falls within their jurisdiction.
  • State and local officials would have access to querying and updating individual statuses.
  • Information would be integrated from various sources which provide input into the system.
  • State Department responsible for vital records - births, deaths, etc.
  • State Department of Taxation – current address, change of Address
  • State Department of Motor Vehicles – current address, change of address
  • State Departments of State – Court actions and restoration of franchise after removed by court action
  • United States Postal Service – National valid addresses, change of address
  • Social Security Administration – births deaths, etc.
  • Federal Department of State – naturalization of new citizens
  • The various Felony level courts at both the State and Federal level – removal of the franchise via felony conviction

Because of the data integration between the various agencies, the idea “voter eligibility” is shifted. There are no “purging the roles” based on inactivity. All citizens are considered active voters.

Where you vote then becomes a function of your primary legal address (of which you will only have one). If you move, that address change will automatically be fed into the system and your information would be downloaded to the local elections office.

When you are born, you are automatically registered into the system and become “eligible to vote” at your 18th birthday. You just have to wait to get there of course.

If you die, when that death is registered it is automatically communicated to the VEEC making you ineligible to vote.

Now in my humble opinion, it would take 10-15 years for such a system. First you need funding. Then the IT experts and Database geeks are going to have to map out the secure communication systems and data interface software that will function between agencies. Then you are going to need a few years each of “Alpha” and “Beta” testing before it can really go live. But once all the players are in place it could really streamline what we view as “voter registration” making it so much easier for (a) us as individuals and (b) for the voting process in general.

WW
 
  1. Only citizens should be allowed to even register to vote
  2. Ballots should have a digital ID that can prove chain of custody and are only sent to the registered voter
  3. Only US Military serving overseas can cast mail in ballots
  4. Ahh fuck it, we're so fucked right now because tens of million of ballots are faked and ineligible, ballots might not be the answer
 
  1. Only citizens should be allowed to even register to vote

This is already the law for Federal elections.

  1. Ballots should have a digital ID that can prove chain of custody and are only sent to the registered voter'

They do. All mail ballot packages have either a digital QR or Barcode that ties the package back to the voter.

No ballot in the United States has a QR or Barcode tracking back to an individual voters (whether mail in or in person) because it would violate the fundamental concept of secret ballots.

  1. Only US Military serving overseas can cast mail in ballots'

So when I was in the military, registered to vote at my home of record (Upstate New York) and stationed in Florida, screw me?

  1. Ahh fuck it, we're so fucked right now because tens of million of ballots are faked and ineligible, ballots might not be the answer

Horse shit.

WW
 
Passed in 1993 and enacted in 1995 the National Voter Registration Act allows anyone with a driver’s license, irrespective of the citizenship, to be able to register to vote

While certain aspects have been challenged, has the overall fundamental unfairness and disenfranchisement of US citizens having their votes canceled by Illegal Aliens ever been challenged at SCOTUS?

The Senate recently tried to restrict voting solely to US Citizens and the entire democrat Party voted against it

I saw that AZ and OH challenged aspects of the law at SCOTUS, but has the entire Act ever been challenged as Unconstitutional?
Only U.S. citizens should vote. I don't care if you come from Canada, Austria, Russia, Iraq, Mexico, or Japan. They shouldn't vote unless they get U.S. citizenship or were born by American parents on said foreign soil.
 
Only U.S. citizens should vote. I don't care if you come from Canada, Austria, Russia, Iraq, Mexico, or Japan. They shouldn't vote unless they get U.S. citizenship or were born by American parents on said foreign soil.

Um...

There is no "or" needed. Person born to US parents on foreign soil are US Citizens.

Just saying.

WW
 
Passed in 1993 and enacted in 1995 the National Voter Registration Act allows anyone with a driver’s license, irrespective of the citizenship, to be able to register to vote

While certain aspects have been challenged, has the overall fundamental unfairness and disenfranchisement of US citizens having their votes canceled by Illegal Aliens ever been challenged at SCOTUS?

The Senate recently tried to restrict voting solely to US Citizens and the entire democrat Party voted against it

I saw that AZ and OH challenged aspects of the law at SCOTUS, but has the entire Act ever been challenged as Unconstitutional?

What state allows non-citizens register to vote in federal election?
 
Only U.S. citizens should vote. I don't care if you come from Canada, Austria, Russia, Iraq, Mexico, or Japan. They shouldn't vote unless they get U.S. citizenship or were born by American parents on said foreign soil.

You'll be happy to know that's what the law currently is for federal elections.
 
Back
Top Bottom