Zone1 Is it Time to Expose the Big Lie That Iran Wants Nuclear Weapons?

[Donald H]

Tulsi Gabbard says Iran not believed to be building a nuclear weapon

Tulsi Gabbard stated that Tehran is not building a nuclear weapon but has increased its enriched uranium stockpile.

www.newsweek.com

Yes, it's time and it's now past due. Iran has conventional weapons equal or superior to any other superpower.

Having a nuclear weapon would be self defeating for Iran. Two reasons.

1. The Zionist regime would be seen as being legitimate to strike first.

2. If Iran had nukes and struck first then their country would be wiped off the map! (along with everyone else)

America's/Zionist lies can now be exposed to the world because Iran has the non-nuclear deterrent to defend itself.

Translate
The United States intelligence community has assessed that Iran is not currently building a nuclear weapon, according to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.

Speaking before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Gabbard stated that the intelligence community "continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003."

 

[JanetTheGreat]

It was time 30 years ago, and it is time today. The whole Iran lie is a silly lie for Neocons to get us to be distracted by our own problems and their loyalty to Israel is their biggest cashcow.

 

[Donald H]

Tulsi Gabbard says Iran not believed to be building a nuclear weapon

Tulsi Gabbard stated that Tehran is not building a nuclear weapon but has increased its enriched uranium stockpile.

www.newsweek.com

Yes, it's time and it's now past due. Iran has conventional weapons equal or superior to any other superpower.

Having a nuclear weapon would be self defeating for Iran. Two reasons.

1. The Zionist regime would be seen as being legitimate to strike first.

2. If Iran had nukes and struck first then their country would be wiped off the map! (along with everyone else)

America's/Zionist lies can now be exposed to the world because Iran has the non-nuclear deterrent to defend itself.

• 
• 

Reactions:Auld Phart and Concerned American

Another questrion might be: Is this too controversial at this point to be discussed? Can the thread survive in this section of the forum?

It's now highly suspected that Russia and/or China have made Iran into a defensive superpower with weaponry that equals or surpsses the world's best.

It appeared to be obviously coming. Now the nuclear question has become N.A.

 

[Rambunctious]

Tulsi Gabbard says Iran not believed to be building a nuclear weapon

Tulsi Gabbard stated that Tehran is not building a nuclear weapon but has increased its enriched uranium stockpile.

www.newsweek.com

Yes, it's time and it's now past due. Iran has conventional weapons equal or superior to any other superpower.

Having a nuclear weapon would be self defeating for Iran. Two reasons.

1. The Zionist regime would be seen as being legitimate to strike first.

2. If Iran had nukes and struck first then their country would be wiped off the map! (along with everyone else)

America's/Zionist lies can now be exposed to the world because Iran has the non-nuclear deterrent to defend itself.

Building a nuclear bomb comes after they enrich enough uranium... which is what they are doing now or was doing... plus this story... a fake news story was out months ago and debunked by Gabbard... try getting up to date so you don't look so dumb....

 

[Donald H]

Trump and Tulsi can't continue to keep whistling different tunes. Add that to the evidence that somebody has to be lying.

 

[The Irish Ram]

What a crock of shit, Don.

 

[Donald H]

Building a nuclear bomb comes after they enrich enough uranium... which is what they are doing now or was doing... plus this story... a fake news story was out months ago and debunked by Gabbard... try getting up to date so you don't look so dumb....

I used that news story to fill the need for a link. I'll regard it as all true.

I realize that the link was on the edge of legitimate but I'm pretty sure that the moderators would dump this one for some reason if it doesn't meet their uhhhhh? expectations.

So why not hoist it up the flagpole to see if anybody salutes it?

After all, it's the most pertinent question that's ever been mentioned here on the Iran nukes topic!

 

[Donald H]

What a crock of shit, Don.

That's about what has to be expected! Although I commend you for doing better than a notification this time.

Can you tell us why there could be any peril involved in Iran having a nuke and using it?

Especially now that they're capable of playing a winning hand with the world's most effective conventional weapons?

(don't imagine that I'm talking at you. You're just handy as a backboard.

 

[Auld Phart]

That's about what has to be expected! Although I commend you for doing better than a notification this time.

Can you tell us why there could be any peril involved in Iran having a nuke and using it?

Especially now that they're capable of playing a winning hand with the world's most effective conventional weapons?

(don't imagine that I'm talking at you. You're just handy as a backboard.

Can you tell us why there could be any peril involved in Iran having a nuke and using it?

a country known for suicide bombers?

what could POSSIBLY go wrong if they had nukes?

 

[Auld Phart]

• 
• 

Reactions:Auld Phart and Concerned American

Another questrion might be: Is this too controversial at this point to be discussed? Can the thread survive in this section of the forum?

It's now highly suspected that Russia and/or China have made Iran into a defensive superpower with weaponry that equals or surpsses the world's best.

It appeared to be obviously coming. Now the nuclear question has become N.A.

Higher ups in Iran say they aren't interested in nukes?

I trust them as far as I can throw Tehran.

 

[BackAgain]

Tulsi Gabbard says Iran not believed to be building a nuclear weapon

Tulsi Gabbard stated that Tehran is not building a nuclear weapon but has increased its enriched uranium stockpile.

www.newsweek.com

Yes, it's time and it's now past due. Iran has conventional weapons equal or superior to any other superpower.

Having a nuclear weapon would be self defeating for Iran. Two reasons.

1. The Zionist regime would be seen as being legitimate to strike first.

2. If Iran had nukes and struck first then their country would be wiped off the map! (along with everyone else)

America's/Zionist lies can now be exposed to the world because Iran has the non-nuclear deterrent to defend itself.

How is this in a clean debate zone? You don’t even bother to state your position artfully. Just “big lie.”

Let’s make it simpler for you.

Sitting on all that oil suggests that they clearly don’t need nuclear power generation.

And yet they have had a lot of uranium and are enriching it all — in what used to be buried secure location(s).

So, if not for energy production, what other reason would they have to possess and enrich uranium if not for a weapons program. As they have claimed.

 

[The Irish Ram]

That's about what has to be expected! Although I commend you for doing better than a notification this time.

Can you tell us why there could be any peril involved in Iran having a nuke and using it?

Sure, I can tell you. Selling nukes to all their friends. Why on earth do you think they would stop at one? They need at least 2. One for the Big Satan and one for the Little. And their Hezbollah friends need one, and the Hoothis. And don't leave out Hamas and the Taliban. Their promise to wipe Israel off the map might be considered perilous to the humans living in Israel...

 

[Donald H]

Sure, I can tell you. Selling nukes to all their friends. Why on earth do you think they would stop at one? They need at least 2. One for the Big Satan and one for the Little. And their Hezbollah friends need one, and the Hoothis. And don't leave out Hamas and the Taliban. Their promise to wipe Israel off the map might be considered perilous to the humans living in Israel...

All of Iran's proxies already have what it takes, and Iran could spoil that by giving a nuke to a proxy, that the proxy freedom fighter might use.

No, my letter bomber friend, the age of nuclear weapons as a deterrent is practically over, now that America was only left with one choice on attempting to destroy Russia and China.

Conventional weapons superiority of course!

Who has the most and the best. I'll grant you a chance to answer, without responding! Free!

 

[Donald H]

How is this in a clean debate zone? You don’t even bother to state your position artfully. Just “big lie.”

Is that your campaign talking point to have the mods remove this one?

Let’s make it simpler for you.

Sitting on all that oil suggests that they clearly don’t need nuclear power generation.

And yet they have had a lot of uranium and are enriching it all — in what used to be buried secure location(s).

So, if not for energy production, what other reason would they have to possess and enrich uranium if not for a weapons program. As they have claimed.

Scientific purposes, specifically medicine. But several other uses too, which you need to look up if you want a better answer.

 

[Donald H]

Is that your campaign talking point to have the mods remove this one?

Scientific purposes, specifically medicine. But several other uses too, which you need to look up if you want a better answer.

a hint: The Peaceful and Safe Uses of Nuclear Energy | IAEA

 

[The Irish Ram]

All of Iran's proxies already have what takes

No. They do not.

 

[The Irish Ram]

a hint: The Peaceful and Safe Uses of Nuclear Energy | IAEA

Because Iran is such a peaceful country...

 

[Donald H]

Higher ups in Iran say they aren't interested in nukes?

I trust them as far as I can throw Tehran.

So does the IAEA!

and Tulsi.

 

[Donald H]

Because Iran is such a peaceful country...

Yes, Iran has started about 40 wars of aggression since the end of WW2.

While America has started none!

No wonder you're telling us that Iran is peaceful!

More substance in your comments or you will be ignored.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Death to America makes them our problem. When Canada is important enough to get their attention, you might want to take precautions too, if the WEF gives you permission....