Is Biden the first Dem president in modern history to experience what GOP presidents experience from MSM?

Wouldnt it be great for democrats if all of those things were actually true? Rapists cant get enough votes to be elected, but Trump can and will. :dunno:
As MAGA jumps in with its denial

I don’t care if you have him on video saying it……He didn’t say it!
 
In my lifetime I cannot think of any Dem president who has experienced the same level of scrutiny that Biden is currently going through right now. Biden is in some ways experiencing the standard GOP treatment, from MSM down to celebrities. This is the most incredible shift in modern history.by the media, though they still find time to throw in the approved narrative about Turmp being "the greatest threat to democracy" and "Trunp is going to imprison his rivals and approve a national abortion ban"! Now, I presume all of this shifts back to 24/7 Trump once Biden is officially nominated at the Dem convention. Until then, he will be facing the fire.
Yeah, Biden is the new Richard Nixon
 
Nope. They are actually being honest. It's a first.
 
There is no video of him saying he raped a woman. :cuckoo:

Just grabbing them by the pussy
Other women claimed he raped them

A jury agreed with claims he sexually assaulted E Jean Carrol
 
Not nearly as close to the freaking scrutiny of the Nixon administration. WAPO "investigative reporters Woodward and Bernstein weren't exactly fair and balanced. Woodward was a long haired hippie who was led by the nose by the ultra left wing son of card carrying communists. Karl Marx Bernstein was raised by radicals to hate former HUAC prosecutor Richard Nixon but nobody ever knew it at the time How in the world could any honest judicial system tolerate placing an anonymous unverified "informant" allegedly deep in a presidential administration giving salacious unverified information every day and how in the world could a fair and balanced system keep his identity secret until he died and could no longer face logical questions about his stories? That's the way the system worked back then when the media was an extension of the democrat party and republicans were outnumbered and too weak to protest. Maybe the same can be said today.
 
Not nearly as close to the freaking scrutiny of the Nixon administration. WAPO "investigative reporters Woodward and Bernstein weren't exactly fair and balanced. Woodward was a long haired hippie who was led by the nose by the ultra left wing son of card carrying communists. Karl Marx Bernstein was raised by radicals to hate former HUAC prosecutor Richard Nixon but nobody ever knew it at the time How in the world could any honest judicial system tolerate placing an anonymous unverified "informant" allegedly deep in a presidential administration giving salacious unverified information every day and how in the world could a fair and balanced system keep his identity secret until he died and could no longer face logical questions about his stories? That's the way the system worked back then when the media was an extension of the democrat party and republicans were outnumbered and too weak to protest. Maybe the same can be said today.
Nixon was worse than was let on
 
Nixon was worse than was let on
Everything was out there. There was nothing left to "let on" about the Nixon administration. Americans landed on the moon and China was opened up. If WAPO investigators could do so much with an uninteresting stodgy old federal lawyer, imagine what they could have done with a freaking informant in the Clinton administration? Unfortunately the left wing media wasn't interested in uncovering salacious stuff either real or unreal in a fun loving democrat administration.
 
Ask E Jean Carrol and 36 other women who claim otherwise
The crazy woman who doesnt know when it supposedly happened? Why would I listen to her? What evidence does she have beyond her claim?
 
The crazy woman who doesnt know when it supposedly happened? Why would I listen to her? What evidence does she have beyond her claim?

Why did two juries believe Carol over Trump

Because Trump claimed he didn’t know her and “she wasn’t his type”
When shown a picture of himself laughing with Carol, he identified her as his ex wife Marla Maples

1720872562192.webp


Not his type?
:auiqs.jpg:
 
President Biden has committed no crimes
Trump is a Convicted Felon

Republicans are trying to imprison his son
That’s not true, Xiden’s own DOJ concluded he willfully retained and disclosed classifed material.

The fact he is too senile to prosecute doesn’t mean he didn’t commit the crimes
 
Why did two juries believe Carol over Trump
Because New Yorkers are biased democrats. Why did they convict him based SOLELY on her word? Her story was absurd and she had no idea when it even happened.
 
Because New Yorkers are biased democrats. Why did they convict him based SOLELY on her word? Her story was absurd and she had no idea when it even happened.
Poor Trump

Everyone is against him
 
Back
Top Bottom