Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 23,413
- 41,649
- 2,430
Is America a Nation of Citizens, or a Territory of ‘People’?
How census rules, immigration enforcement, and political incentives quietly rewired the American social contract.
Is America a Nation of Citizens, or a Territory of 'People'?
How census rules, immigration enforcement, and political incentives quietly rewired the American social contract.
patriotpost.us
Is America for its citizens, or is it for its “people”?
That’s the biggest question on my mind right now.
It may sound like a semantic argument, but it isn’t. It is a foundational question, and thanks to constitutional ambiguity, decades of legislative and judicial drift, and a long refusal to enforce immigration law, it is no longer theoretical. It is immediate, destabilizing, and unavoidable because it sits at the center of nearly every current conflict over immigration.
As immigration laws are now being enforced after decades of active and passive neglect by both major political parties, the country is discovering that it never actually decided what its obligations are or to whom they are owed.
The Constitution uses the word “people” in critical places. Representation in the House is apportioned by population, not by citizenship. That decision made sense in an 18th-century agrarian republic with limited migration and no modern welfare state. It makes far less sense today, when population counts translate directly into money, power, and permanent political advantage. Congressional seats, Electoral College votes, and billions in federal funding are all driven by census counts that don’t distinguish between citizens, legal residents, or illegal aliens. The result is a structural incentive to maximize raw population, regardless of legal status.
Blue states did not stumble into their current immigration posture. While conservatives slept, they have openly welcomed, protected, and subsidized illegal aliens — because bodies count. Each additional person increases representation and funding, even if that person is not legally entitled to be in America. Disguised as humanitarian idealism, this is actually a rational exploitation of a flawed system.
~Snip~
Layered on top of this is a decades-long expansion of constitutional protections for noncitizens by the judiciary. Through court rulings and administrative practice, someone who crossed the border illegally last week is increasingly treated, in many contexts, as the legal equivalent of someone whose family has lived under American law for generations.
The opposition will claim this is an assault on human rights, but it is not. It is about erasing a distinction that every functioning nation must preserve. Citizenship is not a symbolic label but a legal status with reciprocal obligations. When that status is treated as morally or legally irrelevant, citizenship — and its value — begins to dissolve. The UK and EU are in the FO phase of FAFO of immigrant importation right now.
~Snip~
If America is for its citizens, then law matters, membership matters, and enforcement is not oppression. It is maintenance.
We have spent decades avoiding this choice, burying it under euphemisms, court rulings, and bureaucratic improvisation. That avoidance has ended. The conflict now unfolding is not really about immigration policy. It is about whether the United States remains a nation of citizens or becomes a territory administered for whomever arrives and demands entry.
That question will be answered because it must be answered. If there is a silver lining to the ongoing insurrection in Minnesota (and the same insurrectionist perspectives waiting to erupt in other blue states and cities), it is that it will force us to find an answer.
The only remaining issue is whether Americans answer it themselves, deliberately and lawfully, or allow the system to collapse into deeper chaos by default.
Commentary:
The Founders were not “ambiguous”. They were accommodating human slavery, indigenous populations and immigrants.
They are also not responsible for the rampant stupidity exemplified by all Amendments after the first 10.
We have to remember that Democrats and their affiliated Democrats of a Socialist America Marxists
We can’t forget that the left wants nothing less than the obliteration of our nation in any meaningful sense. We can’t get caught up in specific policy fights or infighting and forget what’s really at stake here.
Notice how the current lefty talking point is to refer to illegal aliens as “our neighbors,” as if everyone in the entire world has a right to come here against our laws and the wishes of the majority of the American people and to be considered just the same actual Americans. And the American people have no right to ever remove them even if they’ve broken more than just our immigration laws.
Just think how crazed these Marxist leftists would be if it were in the other direction and Americans went to third-world countries and told the governments and people there they had just as much right as the citizens there to stay forever. They’d rightfully call that “colonization” not being a “neighbor.”
