Intentionally Killing Millions of Citizens Could Totally Be Ethical

Matted Joybeard

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Messages
1,046
Reaction score
362
Points
208
"Smotrich at the Katif conference: 'nobody would let us starve two million civilians to death, even though it might be correct and ethical to do so until they return the hostages'"

 
d-9.webp
 
"Smotrich at the Katif conference: 'nobody would let us starve two million civilians to death, even though it might be correct and ethical to do so until they return the hostages'"


Was what he said wrong?

Maybe your headline made sense, if the intention was to starve them,
but the intention is to free the hostages, so it's their choice if they starve.

Now regardless the situation is far from that,
to prolong the war by feeding Hamas is immoral.

 
Last edited:
How many unnecessary deaths occurred in India under British rule? The real number is unknown but it`s estimated to be somewhere between 200 and 300 million.
 
Just like taking babies, children, Holocaust survivors, elderly, sick and injured civilians hostage and keeping them in inhumane conditions is ethical?
 
Was it ethical to bomb German and Japanese cities during WW2?
 
Back
Top Bottom