Incompetent DOJ

okfine

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2019
Messages
34,607
Reaction score
23,932
Points
1,790
Location
Gold Coast
Not prepared.
Inept.
Incompetent.

They are Trumps personal lawyers
Go figure.

 
Not prepared.
Inept.
Incompetent.

They are Trumps personal lawyers
Go figure.

~~~~~~
Indeed!, The Biden DoJ led by Merrick Garland proved to be inept, incompetent and weaponized to serve the bidding of power hungry Nero-Marxist Democrats against their political enemies.
Those days are over...
 
~~~~~~
Indeed!, The Biden DoJ led by Merrick Garland proved to be inept, incompetent and weaponized to serve the bidding of power hungry Nero-Marxist Democrats against their political enemies.
Those days are over...
If those days are over, why can't the DoJ's lawyer give a straight answer to the judge as to whether they're complying with the court order?
 
So a democrat judge asks if USAID "unfroze" funds, and the DOJ said "I don't know", makes the DOJ look bad?

I disagree. The judge needs to rule so the case can be appealed.

The judge is way outside his constitutional lane, the DOJ should tell him.
 
So a democrat judge asks if USAID "unfroze" funds, and the DOJ said "I don't know", makes the DOJ look bad?

I disagree. The judge needs to rule so the case can be appealed.

The judge is way outside his constitutional lane, the DOJ should tell him.
I forgot to say unprepared also.
It's not the judge's fault the doj sucks at their job.
 
Not prepared.
Inept.
Incompetent.

They are Trumps personal lawyers
Go figure.

A Biden judge made a ruling. Bfd.

Idiots like fume can’t figure out that this ruling means shit once the appeals get going
 
Not prepared.
Inept.
Incompetent.

They are Trumps personal lawyers
Go figure.

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmm, we've had several judges lose their patience over democrat lawyers over the years. I guess you forgot that.
 
So a democrat judge asks if USAID "unfroze" funds, and the DOJ said "I don't know", makes the DOJ look bad?

I disagree. The judge needs to rule so the case can be appealed.

The judge is way outside his constitutional lane, the DOJ should tell him.
Well, yes. It does make them look incompetent. The judge gave them an order and they can't say if they're following it. Why wouldn't they know? That's their job.
 
Well, yes. It does make them look incompetent. The judge gave them an order and they can't say if they're following it. Why wouldn't they know? That's their job.
So the DOJ lawyer should have said, give me a minute so I can call USAID.
Nevermind, there is no one left at USAID to call.
 
Not prepared.
Inept.
Incompetent.

They are Trumps personal lawyers
Go figure.

Yo Dingle Berry

We expect to lose in the DC District and Appellate Courts - It is well known that neither Conservatives nor Republicans have rights they are required to recognize - So we must wait for SCOTUS
 
You got a certificate from Evelyn Wood speed reading and failed.
No way you read the article.
Who would waste their time reading an article by Captain Raw Story the Left Biased stupor-zero?

1000003785.webp
 
Last edited:
So the DOJ lawyer should have said, give me a minute so I can call USAID.
Nevermind, there is no one left at USAID to call.
The DoJ lawyer should have made sure the order was followed in the two weeks since it was issued. If he had done that, he wouldn't have been so clueless.

If they're violating the court order, they should be held in contempt.
 
A judge does not order POTUS around
One unelected and biased party does not vacate the will of the people . The EO clarified this. Trump is currently and correctly ignoring these impermissible personal feelings edicts.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom