In the last few decades, history was completely rewritten

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
153,064
Reaction score
78,281
Points
2,645
Public service Message

History, as we thought we knew it, has ceased to exist.

Much the same was that the complexity of cells disproves the notion that inert chemical elements created Life, the existence of a massive subterranean infrastructure at Giza proves that there was indeed a very advance prior civilization on Earth. Gobekli Tepi shattered the myth that civilization started in the Fertile Crescent 5,000 years ago; Giza now forces us to examine everything we once knew

I have no stock in any of this, there's no benefit to to me or anyone personally to admit this. But to continue to deny it is detrimental

Maybe Giza was some advanced power plant. But for the love of everything we hold Dear, please do massive computer modeling FIRST before any experiment is done here!
 
Here's an article on the Giza discovery:


These findings were only announced a week ago. Other scholars have not yet verified the find, and scientists are already questioning key claims made by the Giza team.

The team's researchers say the city is 38,000 years old, a claim that a radar expert who specializes in archaeology says is "really outlandish."

The article doesn't mention this, but carbon dating has at times yielded wildly contradictory results and is not always reliable.

Bottom line: It's a bit early to be drawing firm conclusions about the Giza discovery.

the complexity of cells disproves the notion that inert chemical elements created Life

Indeed it does. Darwin had no idea that biochemical life was staggeringly complex, nor did he understand the enormous amount of sequenced information contained in biochemical life. Evolutionists cannot explain how biochemical life could have developed from non-living matter, much less how gigantic volumes of genetic data could have come from inorganic matter.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom