'IMMEDIATE recusal': Techno Fog BUSTS Judge Chutkan with her OWN WORDS on Trump in bombshell of a thread

Only because you're insecure over what you presented as "her words". 😄
There is no insecurity. The quotes are accurate and she needs to be taken of the case. A real judge would have recused themself.
 
There is no insecurity. The quotes are accurate and she needs to be taken of the case. A real judge would have recused themself.
What quotes? What specifically did she say and why do you think that means she can't do her job?
 
What quotes? What specifically did she say and why do you think that means she can't do her job?
Chutkan has suggested "Trump should be prosecuted and imprisoned"These statements "are inherently disqualifying"
 
Is that the full quote?
It's somewhat amusing that Chutkan told at least 3 people being sentenced that those inciting them are not jailed, despite the felons complaints that they were misled.

That might have something to do with her impartiality but for two things: ONE she told the truth. TWO she doesn't decide Trump's guilt or non guilt.

She's not buds with prosecutors (or source of income like Scalia and Thomas). She's not suggested Trump's guilty or innocent.
 
It's somewhat amusing that Chutkan told at least 3 people being sentenced that those inciting them are not jailed, despite the felons complaints that they were misled.

That might have something to do with her impartiality but for two things: ONE she told the truth. TWO she doesn't decide Trump's guilt or non guilt.

She's not buds with prosecutors (or source of income like Scalia and Thomas). She's not suggested Trump's guilty or innocent.
When she says trump needs to be incarcerated sounds like she has her mind made up. How illegal and fascist do you want the government to be to get one man?
 
15th post
We understand that the context is not determined by people who hate Trump. She is biased and needs to go.
Context isn't determined by you dumb Simps either. She unlikely to remove herself or be removed by an appellate court.
 
Context and her exact words.

There are multiple reports available from "reputable" sites. IF Trump is proven to have incited the riot or conspiried to overturn an election that was certified by states .... And if the prosecution shows he incited those people whom she sentenced while they said "but we thought it was a good thing" then she's very likely gonna throw the book at him (not literally) because she is a hard time judge.
 
Back
Top Bottom