You can keep pointing this out, but you'll be hard pressed to make them realize this obvious truth.
Part of the Republican mythos is that local control is better, and that the reason our schools are failing is because of Federal interference.
There's no real evidence to support that myth, but when has that ever stopped the Republican loyals from making shit up and then repeating that lie for decades as though it was a apoditic truth?
Not in my lifetime.
I've seen otherwise. I've seen what having the parents directly included in the choices of the schools, you end up with a better program. To separate yourself from the effect of the choices doesn't work. We feel the direct effects of choices made on our schools. We must have a choice when it comes to who's hire and who's fired. I've had to make the choice on hiring several of our employees. From teachers to HR director. Why shouldn't I have a say in that.
It's up to us to be involved directing in choices of things that effect our children.
Bit of the information on Head Start:
We have to put paper work in every year that has all of our funding and how we follow all their requirements. Both Chairpersons (Board and Policy Council) have to sign off on it. The board has to be made up of a lawyer, CPA, education specialist, and a few other specialists.
The Board decides who's on the Board and the Policy Council decides who's on the Policy Council. We are required have by-laws, standing rules, etc etc for both parts of the governance of the program.
Yes, some of the things are confining but we have the ability to lobby directly to our elected officials about changes. I am now in direct contact with elected officials thanks to Head Start. One of the topics I'm currently talking with them about is requiring a former parent on the Boards of Head Start. I feel it will have a direct effect on the programs that benefit the programs.
Both the Board and Policy Council are nonpaying. The Policy Council is reimbursed for some of their expenses. Board is not reimbursed.