I'm a news junkie so maybe it's just me but I seem to recall a lot of headlines like this one.

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
33,845
Reaction score
27,554
Points
2,820

Does President Trump have the authority to remove Ms. Cook?​


That's cuz he does a lot of things stretching the bounds of presidential authority and dares anyone to stop him. After getting immunity for breaking the law while prez and having the SC in his back pocket I get how he could be emboldened to assume he has powers prez's have not previously exercised. But no reading of the Constitution to date allows many of the actions he's taken. Until the Roberts court and the radical conservative majority that is.

Lev Menand, a professor at Columbia Law School and former economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said he thought the allegations so far against Ms. Cook were “not sufficient” to allow Mr. Trump to remove her from the Fed, adding that she has not been charged or convicted of any crime.

“If there were a conviction for mortgage fraud, then we have this question of whether or not the statute would allow that as cause” for her firing, Mr. Menand said, noting that the law generally permits dismissal for wrongdoings related to professional misconduct.

“This would be a complicated proceeding,” he said.
 

Does President Trump have the authority to remove Ms. Cook?​


That's cuz he does a lot of things stretching the bounds of presidential authority and dares anyone to stop him. After getting immunity for breaking the law while prez and having the SC in his back pocket I get how he could be emboldened to assume he has powers prez's have not previously exercised. But no reading of the Constitution to date allows many of the actions he's taken. Until the Roberts court and the radical conservative majority that is.

Lev Menand, a professor at Columbia Law School and former economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said he thought the allegations so far against Ms. Cook were “not sufficient” to allow Mr. Trump to remove her from the Fed, adding that she has not been charged or convicted of any crime.

“If there were a conviction for mortgage fraud, then we have this question of whether or not the statute would allow that as cause” for her firing, Mr. Menand said, noting that the law generally permits dismissal for wrongdoings related to professional misconduct.

“This would be a complicated proceeding,” he said.

Someone who is in part responsible for the fiscal operations of our entire country can't fill our mortgage applications properly?

Sorry, bye bye.
 

Does President Trump have the authority to remove Ms. Cook?​


That's cuz he does a lot of things stretching the bounds of presidential authority and dares anyone to stop him. After getting immunity for breaking the law while prez and having the SC in his back pocket I get how he could be emboldened to assume he has powers prez's have not previously exercised. But no reading of the Constitution to date allows many of the actions he's taken. Until the Roberts court and the radical conservative majority that is.

Lev Menand, a professor at Columbia Law School and former economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said he thought the allegations so far against Ms. Cook were “not sufficient” to allow Mr. Trump to remove her from the Fed, adding that she has not been charged or convicted of any crime.

“If there were a conviction for mortgage fraud, then we have this question of whether or not the statute would allow that as cause” for her firing, Mr. Menand said, noting that the law generally permits dismissal for wrongdoings related to professional misconduct.

“This would be a complicated proceeding,” he said.
Are you trying to say that someone who commits mortgage fraud should stay employed?
 
Last edited:
Loss of the public trust is cause for anyone working in the executive branch. The sooner the Supreme Court ends Humphreys Executor the sooner this silliness ends.
 
Dirty little secret: he doesn't have the authority.

The Fed isn't a gubmint agency; it's a privately held cartel grift of Wall Street banksters.

Were the Fed actually a gubmint agency, it would be an unconstitutional direct violation of Article 1, Sections 8 & 10.
 

Does President Trump have the authority to remove Ms. Cook?​


That's cuz he does a lot of things stretching the bounds of presidential authority and dares anyone to stop him. After getting immunity for breaking the law while prez and having the SC in his back pocket I get how he could be emboldened to assume he has powers prez's have not previously exercised. But no reading of the Constitution to date allows many of the actions he's taken. Until the Roberts court and the radical conservative majority that is.

Lev Menand, a professor at Columbia Law School and former economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said he thought the allegations so far against Ms. Cook were “not sufficient” to allow Mr. Trump to remove her from the Fed, adding that she has not been charged or convicted of any crime.

“If there were a conviction for mortgage fraud, then we have this question of whether or not the statute would allow that as cause” for her firing, Mr. Menand said, noting that the law generally permits dismissal for wrongdoings related to professional misconduct.

“This would be a complicated proceeding,” he said.

LOL

 
Commander Trumpfy still commanding , Bugger 86 .
Lots of Un - American Trolls seen retreating , muttering and shaking .

Once the important people have all been removed, the mob will turn on traitors and trouble makers like you , Bugger .

Make an escape plan fast , or you will end up as a lamp post ornament .
 
This is your second OP on the SAME SUBJECT.

Oh come on! DERbergHOF is short a few cents for the Cheerios to feed his family today, so at 2 cents a post, he has to double up on his GASLIGHTING BULLSH**!!!!!!

Leftists are sooooooooooo predictable. They rinse and repeat as often as trained hounds, lol!
 
15th post

Does President Trump have the authority to remove Ms. Cook?​


That's cuz he does a lot of things stretching the bounds of presidential authority and dares anyone to stop him. After getting immunity for breaking the law while prez and having the SC in his back pocket I get how he could be emboldened to assume he has powers prez's have not previously exercised. But no reading of the Constitution to date allows many of the actions he's taken. Until the Roberts court and the radical conservative majority that is.

Lev Menand, a professor at Columbia Law School and former economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, said he thought the allegations so far against Ms. Cook were “not sufficient” to allow Mr. Trump to remove her from the Fed, adding that she has not been charged or convicted of any crime.

“If there were a conviction for mortgage fraud, then we have this question of whether or not the statute would allow that as cause” for her firing, Mr. Menand said, noting that the law generally permits dismissal for wrongdoings related to professional misconduct.

“This would be a complicated proceeding,” he said.

The NY Times is not news. It’s a arm of the Democratic Party and has been for decades.
 
The only Presidential appointment a President can't fire is a judge. They must be impeached by the House and removed by the Senate.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom