C
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by OCA
Just another stick his head in the sand isolationist, what do you expect?
Tim Russert put this question directly to Richard Perle: Can you assure American viewers ... that were in this situation against Saddam Hussein and his removal for American security interests? And what would be the link in terms of Israel?
Originally posted by Kathianne
Hey, there are no boundries on the Palestinians, according to the UN. For the same reasons there are no boundaries on the Israelis, which were founded by the UN in the 1940's.
Logic would tell you that considering the polling for the + umpteenth years, the Israelis not only are wanting a homeland for the Palestianians, they are more than willing to give up real estate to make it happen. So what is the problem? Palestinians that want Israel to cease to exist and to kill any that anything to do with its exitsance.
Originally posted by clash715
Clash- TASISP (Terrorist-Appeasing Supporter of an Islamic Palestine State).
Tell me Kathianne, and try to use your clearly vivid imagination here, is there anything, anything at all, that Israel could do to make you condemn their actions?
Originally posted by Comrade
Originally posted by clash715
Clash- TASISP (Terrorist-Appeasing Supporter of an Islamic Palestine State).
Try to use your clearly vivid imagination here, is there anything, anything at all, that Palestine could do to make you condemn their actions?
Yes. Anybody that INTENTIONALLY targets and attacks civilians is guilty of committing a terrorist act. I am against terrorist acts. Some Palestinians have committed terrorist acts and I have condemned them.
OK. Now it's your turn butthair!!! What would make you condemn Israel? And by the way, wouldn't my acronym be TASIPS, and not TASISP? Oh, sorry, those are details, something you probably don't look at.
http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html
Originally posted by Kathianne
Yeah, they could nuke or bombard the Palestians to the degree that opposition would be insignificant.
Originally posted by gop_jeff
Clash, you have obviously not been here long enough to know that Kathianne is a very articulate and very smart woman. So I would suggest that you shove your name-calling and debate the facts that Kathianne posted - Israel has been willing to give Palestinians a state of their own, but they - or more accurately, Yasser Arafat - has refused.
Originally posted by gop_jeff
I'm no fan of Pat Buchanan. His foreign policy is about 100 years outdated, and his dislike for Israel is as staunch as he claims neo-con's favor towards Israel is.
Yes. Anybody that INTENTIONALLY targets and attacks civilians is guilty of committing a terrorist act. I am against terrorist acts. Some Palestinians have committed terrorist acts and I have condemned them.
OK. Now it's your turn butthair!!! What would make you condemn Israel?
Originally posted by clash715
Buchanan is now an isolationist because he doesn't support doing israel's bidding? Nice logic there moron. Try again.