If White Privilege Existed There Wouldn’t Be a Hearing on White Nationalism in the House of Reps

[ptbw forever]

Right Now.

White identity politics would not be taboo.

 

[Oddball]

If "white privilege" existed, why do the mulattoes Barry Sotero and Kapernick identify as black?

 

[Montrovant]

I'm curious how you are defining white privilege.

 

[ptbw forever]

I'm curious how you are defining white privilege.

White people controlling the country without the ability of non-whites to influence or change it to fit their needs.

It is literally the other way around. Anything non-whites say we have to listen to, consider and act upon, while anything white people say is either ignored or attacked if it doesn’t agree with the non-white narrative.

 

[Montrovant]

I'm curious how you are defining white privilege.

White people controlling the country without the ability of non-whites to influence or change it to fit their needs.

It is literally the other way around. Anything non-whites say we have to listen to, consider and act upon, while anything white people say is either ignored or attacked if it doesn’t agree with the non-white narrative.

You think whites have no ability to influence or change the country?

Minorities may not be powerless, but whites certainly are not, either. Whites are the majority of the population, and even larger majorities in Congress: 75% of the House is white, while 91% of the Senate is white. We've had 1 non-white president, and he was half white.

Minorities have absolutely gained a great deal of influence over the way it was in the past, but the idea that whites have no say in the country is ludicrous.

 

[AveryJarhman]

#TheLargerIssue #SingleParenting #ChildNeglectMaltreatment #MentalHealth #Solutions

​

Hello. I have a question regarding declarations of Racism and Systemic Injustice.

Have you ever taken the time to critically examine the character and values, as well as $motivation$ embraced by Americans asserting Racism or "White Supremacy" continues impeding black or American citizens of African descent from enjoying equality, as well as loudly declaring Racism or "White Privilege" is preventing our black American or foreign born neighbors from achieving success during this point in America's on-going societal evolution.

Calmly reviewing evidence, unquestionably, it is clear in today's ever-evolving American society the primary obstacle impeding our peaceful black or American friends, neighbors and co-workers of African descent from experiencing equality, is IN FACT America's large population of freedom-loving, apparent illogical thinking, HATE embracing, INTRA-RACIAL DISCRIMINATION minded PRO BLACK Americans.

I'm referring to America's PRO BLACK community choosing to hatefully INTIMIDATE, as well as actively IMPEDE or PREVENT our free-thinking, successful, accomplished black or American friends, neighbors and co-workers of African descent from peacefully pursuing THEIR OWN individual unique vision for L, L, (Love) & Happiness.

"Sell-out" "C^^n" and "Uncle Tom" are just a few HATEFUL, denigrating terms "Pro Black, Woke or Conscious Black Community" minded American citizens use to LOUDLY demean and INTIMIDATE our peaceful, free-thinking black American friends, neighbors and co-workers of African descent choosing to peacefully pursue THEIR OWN unique vision for L, L, (Love) & Happiness.

Sadly, PRO BLACK minded Americans like Dr. Umar Johnson, Ph.D, Dr. Shonna Etienne, Ph.D, Dr. Boyce Watkins Watkins, Ph.D, and 'Anti-Racism Strategist' Tariq Nasheed have learned there is $BIG MONEY$ to be made from declaring RACISM, White Privilege and Supremacy are impeding black or American citizens of African descent from experiencing equality, success and prosperity all peaceful, reasonably responsible American and foreign born citizens are entitled to enjoy.

Even sadder is witnessing my so-called responsible, apparent 'WHITE GUILT' embracing fellow American citizens sitting SILENT, allowing Americas PRO BLACK community's cries of RACISM and 'White Privilege' to influence and intimidate them, just as they INTIMIDATE and chastise our peaceful black American neighbors for acting "TOO WHITE".

Become enlightened, YouTube search terms: "mental health illness black community"

What is your opinion of America's INTRA-RACIAL DISCRIMINATORY PRO BLACK community HATING, BULLYING, HARASSING, INTIMIDATING and DENIGRATING our free-thinking, peaceful, successful American and foreign born citizens choosing to experience life on THEIR OWN terms?

http://u.cubeupload.com/AveryJ/66aDenounceINTRARacialD.jpg

"'Pro-Black American' Logic Succinctly Explained By Social Commentator Mr. David Carroll"

​

Peace.
___
American *(Children)* Lives Matter; Take Pride In Parenting; *End Our Nation's *CHILD CARE* PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS*; End Community Violence, Police Anxiety & Educator's Frustrations

 

[Mike Dwight]

America's a special place. I mean, if you spend all your time figuring it out, then you'll find 99 ways to not make a lightbulb. Well anyway, how much Effort does the UK or elsewhere Europe apply People to the solemn importance of History? Is "Hail Columbia" in any word, racist? Is it the true first anthem of the blessed Union? Is it the selection of George Washington the First of Dynastic Country? Is Hail Columbia from the minds of the People's Religion? So you know, a short history that can be abandoned by the next round of voters, especially in the 60's too, living for today and the voting bloc. District of Columbia is rather ugly today, sorry Mr. Washington.

Even sadder is PRO BLACK Fred Rogers, Take Pride in Parenting. End Our Nations CHILD CARE* PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS. yo yo cocaine. We can see how children's television showed America the solid line between helping Your neighbors and your Jungle Fever or, Vice Versa! Snow Glow.

 

[ptbw forever]

I'm curious how you are defining white privilege.

White people controlling the country without the ability of non-whites to influence or change it to fit their needs.

It is literally the other way around. Anything non-whites say we have to listen to, consider and act upon, while anything white people say is either ignored or attacked if it doesn’t agree with the non-white narrative.

You think whites have no ability to influence or change the country?

Minorities may not be powerless, but whites certainly are not, either. Whites are the majority of the population, and even larger majorities in Congress: 75% of the House is white, while 91% of the Senate is white. We've had 1 non-white president, and he was half white.

Minorities have absolutely gained a great deal of influence over the way it was in the past, but the idea that whites have no say in the country is ludicrous.

White identity politics is called racism and terrorism by both parties. That means that we have no way of influencing anything in this country for the betterment of our people. It is amazing how you can be so stupid as to not understand this.

The percentage of white people in the Congress corresponds directly to the percentage of white people in the baby boomer generation because it is the largest generation in the country and the most financially powerful.

EVERY single policy that Democrats have pushed for the past 30 years has been at the expense of white people and for non-white people, and Republicans have been attacked for even trying to do so much as criticize that.

 

[Montrovant]

I'm curious how you are defining white privilege.

White people controlling the country without the ability of non-whites to influence or change it to fit their needs.

It is literally the other way around. Anything non-whites say we have to listen to, consider and act upon, while anything white people say is either ignored or attacked if it doesn’t agree with the non-white narrative.

You think whites have no ability to influence or change the country?

Minorities may not be powerless, but whites certainly are not, either. Whites are the majority of the population, and even larger majorities in Congress: 75% of the House is white, while 91% of the Senate is white. We've had 1 non-white president, and he was half white.

Minorities have absolutely gained a great deal of influence over the way it was in the past, but the idea that whites have no say in the country is ludicrous.

White identity politics is called racism and terrorism by both parties. That means that we have no way of influencing anything in this country for the betterment of our people. It is amazing how you can be so stupid as to not understand this.

The percentage of white people in the Congress corresponds directly to the percentage of white people in the baby boomer generation because it is the largest generation in the country and the most financially powerful.

EVERY single policy that Democrats have pushed for the past 30 years has been at the expense of white people and for non-white people, and Republicans have been attacked for even trying to do so much as criticize that.

Are you going to move the goalposts every time you respond?

You didn't say anything about white people influencing the country as a group for the betterment of white people. You just claimed non-white people control the country without the ability of whites to influence or change it to fit their needs.

Whether the percentage of whites in Congress is in line with the percentage of whites during the Baby Boomer generation is irrelevant to the point.

Every policy pushed by Democrats has been at the expense of white people? Really? I'd love to see a comprehensive list of those policies and how each was at the expense of white people.

 

[ptbw forever]

I'm curious how you are defining white privilege.

White people controlling the country without the ability of non-whites to influence or change it to fit their needs.

It is literally the other way around. Anything non-whites say we have to listen to, consider and act upon, while anything white people say is either ignored or attacked if it doesn’t agree with the non-white narrative.

You think whites have no ability to influence or change the country?

Minorities may not be powerless, but whites certainly are not, either. Whites are the majority of the population, and even larger majorities in Congress: 75% of the House is white, while 91% of the Senate is white. We've had 1 non-white president, and he was half white.

Minorities have absolutely gained a great deal of influence over the way it was in the past, but the idea that whites have no say in the country is ludicrous.

White identity politics is called racism and terrorism by both parties. That means that we have no way of influencing anything in this country for the betterment of our people. It is amazing how you can be so stupid as to not understand this.

The percentage of white people in the Congress corresponds directly to the percentage of white people in the baby boomer generation because it is the largest generation in the country and the most financially powerful.

EVERY single policy that Democrats have pushed for the past 30 years has been at the expense of white people and for non-white people, and Republicans have been attacked for even trying to do so much as criticize that.

You didn't say anything about white people influencing the country as a group for the betterment of white people. You just claimed non-white people control the country without the ability of whites to influence or change it to fit their needs.

These 2 statements are literally the same.

If white people can’t influence the country for the betterment of ourselves then we logically we can’t influence it or change to fit our needs, and if white people can’t do these things because we are white then logically it stands to reason that non-white people can because they aren’t white.

Whether the percentage of whites in Congress is in line with the percentage of whites during the Baby Boomer generation is irrelevant to the point

No it isn’t moron

You claimed that white people being the majority in Congress means that we have influence in the direction of the country when I just proved that demographics is the only reason there are any white people in the Congress at all. Once the baby boomers die out and the millennials represent the country the current culture combined with the demographics will insure that minorities(especially black people)are way overrepresented in the Congress.

How do you people continue to exist when you are obviously so stupid?

 

[Montrovant]

I'm curious how you are defining white privilege.

White people controlling the country without the ability of non-whites to influence or change it to fit their needs.

It is literally the other way around. Anything non-whites say we have to listen to, consider and act upon, while anything white people say is either ignored or attacked if it doesn’t agree with the non-white narrative.

You think whites have no ability to influence or change the country?

Minorities may not be powerless, but whites certainly are not, either. Whites are the majority of the population, and even larger majorities in Congress: 75% of the House is white, while 91% of the Senate is white. We've had 1 non-white president, and he was half white.

Minorities have absolutely gained a great deal of influence over the way it was in the past, but the idea that whites have no say in the country is ludicrous.

White identity politics is called racism and terrorism by both parties. That means that we have no way of influencing anything in this country for the betterment of our people. It is amazing how you can be so stupid as to not understand this.

The percentage of white people in the Congress corresponds directly to the percentage of white people in the baby boomer generation because it is the largest generation in the country and the most financially powerful.

EVERY single policy that Democrats have pushed for the past 30 years has been at the expense of white people and for non-white people, and Republicans have been attacked for even trying to do so much as criticize that.

You didn't say anything about white people influencing the country as a group for the betterment of white people. You just claimed non-white people control the country without the ability of whites to influence or change it to fit their needs.

These 2 statements are literally the same.

If white people can’t influence the country for the betterment of ourselves then we logically we can’t influence it or change to fit our needs, and if white people can’t do these things because we are white then logically it stands to reason that non-white people can because they aren’t white.

Whether the percentage of whites in Congress is in line with the percentage of whites during the Baby Boomer generation is irrelevant to the point

No it isn’t moron

You claimed that white people being the majority in Congress means that we have influence in the direction of the country when I just proved that demographics is the only reason there are any white people in the Congress at all. Once the baby boomers die out and the millennials represent the country the current culture combined with the demographics will insure that minorities(especially black people)are way overrepresented in the Congress.

How do you people continue to exist when you are obviously so stupid?

I don't think the word literally means what you think it means.

And once again, the idea that white people have no influence in the country is ludicrous.

You in no way proved that "demographics is the only reason there are white people in Congress at all." You made a claim which was irrelevant to the point, didn't support it in any way, and apparently consider it proof. Let's think about it a bit. Are you saying people vote based on demographics? If demographics determine the number of people in Congress, why do the House and Senate have different racial demographics? If demographics determine the number of people in Congress, doesn't that indicate there are far more white people than minorities, which would mean whites have more influence in government?

Maybe minorities will end up over-represented in Congress eventually. Right now, however, they remain under-represented, which is an odd state of affairs if you think minorities have all of the control in the country.

Still looking for that list of Democratic policies which have only hurt white people.

 

[ptbw forever]

If demographics determine the number of people in Congress, why do the House and Senate have different racial demographics?

Because the Senate and House are vastly different and the candidates for the Senate need to appeal to the whole state while House reps only run in their district? Why do you ask such stupid questions while being smug?

If demographics determine the number of people in Congress, doesn't that indicate there are far more white people than minorities, which would mean whites have more influence in government?

No because identity politics for white people is considered racism. Even someone who simply holds pro-white views and doesn’t even try to start up a pro-white debate in Congress is attacked(i.e Steve King). That is the reason why people like Candace Owens and Republicans in Congress always talk about BLACK babies being killed by abortion(despite the majority of babies being aborted since abortion became protected under the law being WHITE), or ASIAN people being discriminated by Affirmative Action etc. Even the opioid crisis is never referred to as a white issue unless the left talks about it in those terms. None of the white people in Congress represent me or any white citizen in this country.Instead they all wish to make it impossible for white people to create advocacy groups.

Still looking for that list of Democratic policies which have only hurt white people.

I never said ONLY white people. I said they were created with the intent to hurt white people.

Everything from the recent push for reparations to the removing of Christianity from the public square was done to destroy white people. The housing loans were given to minorities at the expense of whites and the economy at large. Affirmative action was done at the expense of whites(and don’t you dare say that white women benefiting from it negates the negatives from white men being hurt by it and bringing down the whole family unit). Obamacare was created to benefit minorities at the expense of whites. Sanctuary cities were created to benefit Hispanics at the expense of primarily whites. Hate crime legislation never includes white people in it and was created to benefit minorities.

Every single policy that Democrats create today hurts white people. And every single Republican policy does its best to avoid benefitting anyone too much.

 

[Montrovant]

Because the Senate and House are vastly different and the candidates for the Senate need to appeal to the whole state while House reps only run in their district? Why do you ask such stupid questions while being smug?

Then the numbers are not based solely on demographics, as you claimed. Gotcha.

No because identity politics for white people is considered racism. Even someone who simply holds pro-white views and doesn’t even try to start up a pro-white debate in Congress is attacked(i.e Steve King). That is the reason why people like Candace Owens and Republicans in Congress always talk about BLACK babies being killed by abortion(despite the majority of babies being aborted since abortion became protected under the law being WHITE), or ASIAN people being discriminated by Affirmative Action etc. Even the opioid crisis is never referred to as a white issue unless the left talks about it in those terms. None of the white people in Congress represent me or any white citizen in this country.Instead they all wish to make it impossible for white people to create advocacy groups.

The people in Congress represent the people of the district or state in which they were elected. That includes you if you live in the US. You may not like it, but that's the way the system works. What you seem to mean is that you don't agree with the policies or beliefs of your representative, which is a different thing.

I never said ONLY white people. I said they were created with the intent to hurt white people.

Everything from the recent push for reparations to the removing of Christianity from the public square was done to destroy white people. The housing loans were given to minorities at the expense of whites and the economy at large. Affirmative action was done at the expense of whites(and don’t you dare say that white women benefiting from it negates the negatives from white men being hurt by it and bringing down the whole family unit). Obamacare was created to benefit minorities at the expense of whites. Sanctuary cities were created to benefit Hispanics at the expense of primarily whites. Hate crime legislation never includes white people in it and was created to benefit minorities.

Every single policy that Democrats create today hurts white people. And every single Republican policy does its best to avoid benefitting anyone too much.

I wasn't saying the Democrats policies couldn't hurt other groups, rather I was repeating your claim that "EVERY single policy that Democrats have pushed for the past 30 years has been at the expense of white people and for non-white people," using different words. The policies only hurt, never helped, according to you.

Whites are not the only Christians, and Christianity has not been removed from public. Are you trying to say that the housing loans which helped lead to the recession were only given to minorities? You admit that white women have benefited from affirmative action, but apparently hurting white men is what you're actually talking about now. I'm not sure how the ACA benefits minorities and not whites. Hate crime legislation does, in fact, benefit members of all races, even if it may be used more often against whites. Here's the FBI hate crime stats for 2017 to give you an example: Victims. I'd have to go look, but is hate crime legislation only pushed by Democrats?

Democrats have pushed plenty of crappy policies. They haven't all been put forth to hurt white people, however.

 

[harmonica]

it's just bullshit--like all the cries of racism/racist/nazis/white supremacists/etc