If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

[excalibur]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

 

[Crepitus]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

Are you really this dumb?

 

[petro]

It's legitimate criticism, screw liberals dog whistle.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

It's not. Joe said he picked her strictly for her skin color and plumbing. Harris is a cackling moron. Even Dims know this.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Who was selected not elected

 

[Mortis]

DEI is very bad for America! Just look at Disney (one of many woke businesses). Also how the Democrats "promotes" GROOMING.

I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want my kids being "groomed". It's down-right SICK.

Misusing the term ‘grooming’ is problematic, experts say

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ press secretary Christina Pushaw was not happy that critics had nicknamed a controversial Flo

www.politifact.com

 

[excalibur]

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

Too funny. You leftoids, such good cultists.

 

[Mac-7]

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

Yes, its intended as an insult

Just as libs calling MAGAs Nazis, racist, ect

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Too funny. You leftoids, such good cultists.

I don't have time to explain this again but it's explained here:
Do you think that in America major companies should have “minority” hiring quotas?

 

[el midgetron]

Never ever question the doctrine. That’s the first rule of woke club.

Seriously though, DEI is just like a weak and faggy version of Jim Crow.

 

[Foxfyre]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

Good question. I wonder if any leftist will have a good answer for it?

 

[Foxfyre]

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

Really? We don't complain when you use MAGA as a slur. We just provide the correct definition of MAGA.

Is it that leftists are unable to provide a defensible definition of DEI?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Good question. I wonder if any leftist will have a good answer for it?

No.
This is just another irreconcilable dichotomy of the democrat party.
But that doesn’t matter to them as long as the objective of destroying American culture is achieved.

 

[Foxfyre]

No.
This is just another irreconcilable dichotomy of the democrat party.
But that doesn’t matter to them as long as the objective of destroying American culture is achieved.

We need to be aware of all the myriad steps used to accomplish that objective though. They claim to fight racism by accusing Patriots of racism while they use racism to do that. DEI is their objective even as they call Patriots racist, phobic, misogynist etc. if we point out that DEI is their objective.

It's nuts. But it's right out of Alinsky's Marxist rules for radicals.

 

[Resnic]

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

We're not using it as a slur. We're using the literal definition which is racist and misogynistic by its very definition.

If you adhere to dei guidelines and hire women and non whites to intentionally deversify then you are being racist and sexist by saying "we won't hire a white person or a man". Everytime you say "we will hire a black person" you are in effect saying "we will not hire a white person".

Which by the way is against the law because the equal opportunity employment act says you can not hire based on sex, skin color, etc.

Employers

Employers

www.eeoc.gov

A dei hire is intentionally creating diversity which is racist and sexist because it is saying you will only hire people not based on qualifications but instead on skin color, sex and so on.

 

[Rawley]

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

Disagree. It has the same meaning. We all seem to agree she was chosen because she was a black woman. DEI.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Well?

Fair question, eh.

But Democrats, having very little to offer, pay not attention to the [wo]man behind the screen, will always fall back on 'muh, racism'.

Indeed: If DEI is good, and corporations were applauded for having DEI officers, why is it sexist and racist to call Harris a DEI pick as VP?

What is a DEI pick? Is Trump an idiot pick?

 

[Hollie]

Because you all are using it as a slur.

Intentionally.

And because it doesn't have the meaning that racists and misogynists and others have assigned to it.

It's always convenient to hurl the "racist" canard when you can't defend an argument. Harris was DIE hire as stated by ole' Stumblbum.

Joe Biden Himself Called Kamala Harris a DEI Vice President Just Two Months Ago

Outgoing Democrat President Joe Biden himself called his own Vice President Kamala Harris a “diversity, equality, and inclusion” pick just two months ago.

www.breitbart.com

You may find the term uncomfortable but Biden made it clear that Harris was a DIE hire.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

It's always convenient to hurl the "racist" canard when you can't defend an argument. Harris was DIE hire as stated by ole' Stumblbum.

Joe Biden Himself Called Kamala Harris a DEI Vice President Just Two Months Ago

Outgoing Democrat President Joe Biden himself called his own Vice President Kamala Harris a “diversity, equality, and inclusion” pick just two months ago.

www.breitbart.com

You may find the term uncomfortable but Bifen made it clear that Harrisxwas a DIE hire.

What is a DIE hire?