"such a typical trait that exist in Israel" is such and Anti-zionist crap that holds ignorant people.
You have friends, but you have never seen anything with your own eyes, you've read books and magazines, but never experienced on your own flesh.
"It doesn't matter how much I know about Israel what I do know is that I hate the country".
So you admit yourself, you hate something you know nothing about.
It isn't rare, though.
Most haters have the same problem.
kinda making me think that the holocaust wasn't so bad, now. i mean, i have never seen it with my own eyes or experienced it with my own flesh. does a brief brush with internment count?
are you a holocaust denier? your argument seems designed for one.
are you and your fellow terrorist supporters intentionally trolling this thread and trying to turn it into the typical nonsense that goes on in the is/pal forum for a reason?
or is it just because you can't get negged? or are you so used to spewing propaganda that you can't engage in the topic at hand... which is why is israel held to a different standard than every other country?
no need to respond... it's rhetorical. but feel free to return to the is/pal threads.
i, and most of the pro-palestinian poster, eschew "terrorism" in all its forms. we condemn it, but we also try to understand the causes. i, myself , and being irish, do not like the word at all because it is a word that interjects what i think is an inappropriate emotionalism into an argument.
i have no idea what you mean by trolling? my posts, and the pro-palestian posts, have for the most part on topic and on target. i think it is the anti-palestinian/anti-muslim posters who have been the ones who have digressed and indulged a bit in personal attacks.
i think that the reasons these threads fall apart is that the anti-palestinian posters like yourself have very little to offer in the form of an adequate response when people counter their arguments. i think your last sentence demonstrates this perfectly..."no need to respond... it's rhetorical. but feel free to return to the is/pal threads." rhetorical questions are supposed to have obvious answers to all who read or hear them, not just the person asking. the only thing obvious about your questions is that you are angry and, probably, frustrated.
you began this thread with a very bad analogy about a very controversial subject. to expect people in opposition not to respond is a bit preposterous, don't you think?
i know you took a particular delight in "negging" me, but it has not really affected my posts all that much. if anything, it has made me more mellow. an aquantice of yours who also opted out described being out o the rep system as "liberating". that is sort of an odd word to use, actually, and it struck me because a while earlier, another poster had asked me how it was outside the rep system and i told him that i felt "liberated." i'm sorry if it takes away any real or imagined power you may think you have. you can, if you would like, PM me with a nasty comment or two.
why do you assume i hold israel to a different standard? i don't, other than the fact that different countries have different histories and different timelines and exist in different circumstances. i think it is zionists who hold israel to far lower standards than they hold other countries.
i too think that, if you want to discusss israel being held to different standards, perhaps you should have a thread title like "Why Is Israel Held to Different Standards?" instead of something about "Mexican Terrorists" and then, making a poor analogy.
also, if you really did not want this to degenerate onto the kind of thread on the israel/palestine forum, perhaps you should read the first page of this thread at least and try to make an honest determination of where it began to go downhill, or if that is too tedious, read the first three posts.
thank you, jilli, for your input.