ICE arrests Palestinian activist who helped lead Columbia University protests, his lawyer says

The fascist Trump regime at its most authoritarian.
TRANSLATION: Donald is really cleaning out the rot we planted in the universities!

The unlawful, unwarranted detention of an immigrant lawfully in the country exercising his First Amendment right to freedom of expression.
TRANSLATION: the overdue, patriotic, necessary detention of an immigrant originally lawfully in the country abusing his privileges as a visitor here who is now going to pay for his malfeasance.

And like the fascist thug he is, Trump is attempting to silence dissent and lawful protest.
TRANSLATION: the rat bastard Trump actually has the balls to stand up against and to do something about little leftwing commies coming here promoting unlawful violence and destruction. What the hell will democrats do now???
 
No one mentioned a 'question', so I have no idea what you are talking about. You said they were equal, and I provided conclusive proof you were incorrect. Sorry, my post reflects study, and is well researched. Either you are daft, or clueless, or both. I'd say the latter given your hideous grammar.
You literally said in your second paragraph “the question…”

Are you really this clueless?
 
You literally said in your second paragraph “the question…”

Are you really this clueless?
You don't even know what a rhetorical question is.

THAT is how clueless you are.

rhetoric.webp
 
you want to lecture about criminal records? Sit down and let’s talk about your hero, one Donald J. Trump--a full-blown, neon-lit, sirens-blaring catastrophe of corruption, fraud, and authoritarian delusions, wrapped in a spray-tanned ego with the impulse control of a raccoon on meth.

This isn’t just a case of "bad judgment." No, Trump is a national security threat on legs--a walking, talking liability with 91 felony charges hanging over his head, found liable for sexual abuse, financial fraud, and outright theft. The man’s got more pending court dates than campaign stops, and yet here you are, clutching your pearls over someone else’s criminal record while your guy is out here hoarding nuclear secrets in a bathroom, selling America’s foreign policy to the highest bidder, and surrounding himself with more convicted felons than an episode of Cops.

Let’s take a stroll down criminal lane, shall we? His campaign chairman (Manafort)? Convicted. His longtime fixer (Cohen)? Convicted. His National Security Advisor (Flynn)? Convicted. His Chief Strategist (Bannon)? Indicted for fraud. His personal lawyer (Giuliani)? Disbarred and sued into oblivion. His company’s CFO (Weisselberg)? Serving time for tax fraud. His trade advisor (Navarro)? Convicted of contempt. His top donor and inaugural chairman (Barrack)? Indicted for acting as a foreign agent. And himself? Found guilty of defamation, fraud, and campaign finance violations before even touching the four criminal indictments stacked against him.

Your guy literally tried to overthrow the government and then had the gall to call it “a perfect day.” He didn’t just pardon war criminals--he tried to make them political props. He stood shoulder to shoulder with dictators, threw his own intelligence agencies under the bus to kiss Putin’s boots, and ran his administration like a failing casino--looting it for cash, stiffing contractors, and leaving a pile of debt for someone else to clean up.

And yet this is the guy you want to pretend is some kind of moral alternative? Please. If criminal history disqualifies someone from being a “hero,” then Donald Trump shouldn’t just be out of politics--he should be sitting in a prison cell next to half his staff. Spare us the outrage, Oli. Your hypocrisy is showing, and it’s glowing in big, gaudy, gold-plated Trump Tower letters.
Blah blah blah, sorry but you corporate media sheep have zero credibility. You don’t care about criminal activity. You don’t care about truth or morality. You are fully devoted to the two-minutes-of-hate and will dutifully follow your orders where ever it takes you.

Your shit stinks. Get help. Find a therapist. Sober up.
 
It’s a type of question. Which is why I found it odd you claimed nobody mentioned a question
It's a statement in question form merely as a rhetorical device. a rhetorical question does not seek an answer so, to me, they are not questions, so that is why I had no idea what you are talking about. What is odd is why are you focusing on it? It's nothing to do, really, with the topic,
 
Blah blah blah, sorry but you corporate media sheep have zero credibility. You don’t care about criminal activity. You don’t care about truth or morality. You are fully devoted to the two-minutes-of-hate and will dutifully follow your orders where ever it takes you.

Your shit stinks. Get help. Find a therapist. Sober up.
simpletons.webp
 
It's a statement in question form merely as a rhetorical device. a rhetorical question does not seek an answer so, to me, they are not questions, so that is why I had no idea what you are talking about. What is odd is why are you focusing on it? It's nothing to do, really, with the topic,
A rhetorical question is in fact a type of question
 


The ONLY reason a judge would do that is if there a was habeas corpus issue, or a due process issue, of some kind. The NYPost says 'alleged'. You see, what if they were green card holders and some were wrongfully rounded up by ICE? Their rights would be violated, so we need to find the answer to thar question. The article title is clickbait, nd NYPost is notorious for tabloid-esque headlines. What if the green card holder were you and you were innocent, wouldn't you be cheering that judge for looking out for your rights? But, you guys have this lynch mob mentality. Deport now, ask questions later, and don't tell me ICE doesn't operate like that.
 
The ONLY reason a judge would do that is if there a was habeas corpus issue, or a due process issue, of some kind. The NYPost says 'alleged'. You see, what if they were green card holders and some were wrongfully rounded up by ICE? Their rights would be violated, so we need to find the answer to thar question. The article title is clickbait, nd NYPost is notorious for tabloid-esque headlines. What if the green card holder were you and you were innocent, wouldn't you be cheering that judge for looking out for your rights? But, you guys have this lynch mob mentality. Deport now, ask questions later, and don't tell me ICE doesn't operate like that.
If they had a green card why didn’t they just show it? Moreover a green card can be revoked
 
If they had a green card why didn’t they just show it? Moreover a green card can be revoked
A green card won't stop ICE from putting someone in custody if they suspect they have committed a crime. They are not supposed to, but they do it.
 
A green card won't stop ICE from putting someone in custody if they suspect they have committed a crime. They are not supposed to, but they do it.
Huh? They aren’t suppose to put people that commit crimes in custody? You can lose your green card for commiting crimes
 
Huh? They aren’t suppose to put people that commit crimes in custody? You can lose your green card for commiting crimes
There is thing called due process. allegations have to be proven. NYPOST states 'alleged'.
 
There is thing called due process. allegations have to be proven. NYPOST states 'alleged'.
What due process is a green card holder losing? Or are you just making an accusation?
 
15th post
The ONLY reason a judge would do that is if there a was habeas corpus issue, or a due process issue, of some kind. The NYPost says 'alleged'. You see, what if they were green card holders and some were wrongfully rounded up by ICE? Their rights would be violated, so we need to find the answer to thar question. The article title is clickbait, nd NYPost is notorious for tabloid-esque headlines. What if the green card holder were you and you were innocent, wouldn't you be cheering that judge for looking out for your rights? But, you guys have this lynch mob mentality. Deport now, ask questions later, and don't tell me ICE doesn't operate like that.
Oh look, not only are you immediately engaging with the “simpleton” after claiming you don’t, you are now also advocating for violent gang members after your long-winded dim-witted spiel about “criminals”.

Get a therapist.
 
What due process is a green card holder losing? Or are you just making an accusation?
are you serious? It’s the basic right to not be punished without a fair trial. You might have heard of it. It’s in the Constitution.
 
I don’t know what in your tirade you think was so sophisticated, it was all low grade TDS. MSM talking points that have been spoon-fed to you like a baby.

Slow clap for the prideful sheep. Your shit still stinks, btw.
I'm sorry, I don't take morons seriously.
 
Back
Top Bottom