Why??? WTF was wrong with traditional bulbs? What government entity thought this was a smart idea? Did they include subsidies for the poor to be able to afford these bulbs?
Well, there are still plenty of incandescent bulbs out there, but the supply is dwindling and will inevitably run dry.
LED illuminators are where the lighting industry is heading.
The cost of these units has already come down to a third of what they intro'd at, but as you pointed out, they're well beyond the .60 cents of the old lightbulb.
The lifespan of the LED is projected to be roughly 50,000 hours of use... and users who dim these units will likely see 70-80,000 hours.
Eventually, the 'lightbulb' will slip out of the lexicon and at some point, the question to 'How many Leftists does it take to change a lightbulb?' will be answered by the future generations with "Why would a light be in a bulb and why would anyone want to change one?"
The cost of operation of the LED is a tiny fraction of the old analogue units, with a 75 watt equivalent illuminator costing only 8 -12 watts, with virtually no transient heat. We just finished a design for a client who was using 90 watt incandescent floods to light their home. With the local KW/hour rate, the kitchen alone cost them just over $20/day to light, with this not including the added expense in air conditioning to overcome the substantial transient heat cast off by the old units. Today the kitchen expense is less than 3 dollars, with better, substantially more comprehensive lighting.
So yeah... the old bulbs are going the way of the wind. But the new technology is actually an improvement... .
Hope that helps, if only in some small way.