"No generation has the right to borrow more than it can ever repay" (paraphrase)WasHinGODtOn See me satan god washington and christ all agree
Sincerely,
Daniel Ray Waters Hazelton Ortiz
anagram
antenatal lies zero ritzy DRWHO A realization of zany letters
Other interesting facts proving retro-causality
WA HI OR ID anagrams I AI DRWHO & HOWARD II a actual intelligence A.I. seeded from me
Represent the blue and white stars of the flag and Washington is the central state
Use bitcoin like currencies completely NOW central banks are not cohesive to our existence
cryptocurrencies partly responsible for the mass synchronicity which is me
Dear
Drwho
I see you have a gift of reading deeper spiritual meanings into words and symbols.
I happen to have a related gift of empathy and interpretation.
If people do not understand the deeper significance you are trying to express,
I can try to help interpret what you are mean and are "trying" to say.
Satan represents the Self.
Christ represents the Conscience.
God represents a myriad of infinite things combined,
from Good will to collective truth, divine wisdom and universal laws of love and the universe,
and forces of nature and creation.
* So you are saying this PRINCIPLE you state:
That nobody has the right to borrow more than can be repaid
is so TRUE that "all sources would agree"
My question to you, is who is approving the loan.
And doesn't it make THOSE parties responsible for justifying the costs.
If you borrow money from a source that doesn't approve it,
that is like using someone's credit card without permission or authorization.
So the people who end up charged the debt can REJECT it, and show
they never authorized it, so they cannot be held responsible. Then the
charges are traced back to whoever DID incur them, and THOSE parties
should be held responsible. (EX: in the case of contested war contracts and spending,
the Bush administration and GOP members who approved the spending could be held
responsible for paying back anything rejected as unauthorized spending; in the case of
ACA the Democrats who were found to have allotted tax money without approval of
Congress can be held to collect and pay it back through whatever means they choose;
and in the case of the 24 billion federal shutdown because Congress deadlocked over
the budget due to conflicts with ACA argued as unconstitutional, both sides that failed to
change ACA mandates to optional in order to correct the problem could be held liable.)
* I suggest that we as taxpayers charged with these debts,
ASSESS the causes of debts and WHICH PARTIES paid or benefited from the charges.
Similar to checking our Credit Card statement, we approve or reject the charges.
* Then we assess who is responsible for the debts and costs incurred.
If these parties cannot pay it back, we work out a settlement agreement,
and credit back the taxpayers such as by tracking the credits in an account
similar to the Federal Reserve. Then the wrongdoers or profiteers are responsible
for paying that account that represents how much THEY borrowed from taxpayers!
* To SECURE the value of the loan or debt, we assign property or a program that
is owned by govt as COLLATERAL on that money until it is earned or paid back.
so if the debt came from energy development that failed, the debt is transferred
to a correction program to do the job RIGHT and recover the losses in the process.
The COST of the debt becomes the VALUE of the collateral, which other bidders
can buy out who agree to take over and be in charge of the SOLUTION to settle
the debt in ways that either SAVE MONEY in the longrun to pay off the debt, or
generate revenue to pay it back plus produce more to invest forward.
In the meantime, the assessed VALUE of the debt is held in CREDIT, and that
credit (either issued through Notes or through a credit system) is used to manage
and pay for the jobs, works and costs of fixing the problem and creating a
cost effective solution that pays back the debt over time and turns it into a surplus.
so it is a LOAN that is assigned to a team or process to turn it into investment that
GENERATES revenue and/or SAVES resources.
* Either the wrongdoers or borrowers who incurred the original debt pay off their own loans or debts,
or if other investors or citizens buy out the shares with their money, donations, investment or labor,
then they claim OWNERSHIP of the property or program assigned as COLLATERAL to secure that debt.
Drwho: Here is a example of independent currency used
to track LABOR HOURS of workers in a cooperative pool:
Introducing HOUR Money
I am proposing to APPLY this model of "labor-backed currency"
to track DEBTS as LOANS of taxpayers' money and allow groups
to BID to buy out Ownership of these debts by offering solutions
they agree to invest their labor and revenue in until the debt is resolved
and/or is turned around to pay forward so the solution is sustainable.
