Man of Ethics
Gold Member
- Feb 28, 2021
- 4,693
- 2,138
- 248
Please share your ideas first.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With any president other than Trump, you'd know they'd go to war, and would potentially launch nukes at Moscow, at the very least.Please share your ideas first.
No nation is launching nukes at another nation, if they arent being attacked by that nation. The US wont go to nuclear armageddon for another nation.Many Russian strategists believe that US would not go to nuclear war with Russia -- which may be the case. Thus they believe they can attack UK with impunity.
It's YOUR thread. Why aren't YOU sharing your ideas first?Please share your ideas first.
Much in the same why Russia would respond to an American nuclear attack on Great Britain.How would USA respond to a Russian nuclear attack on Great Britain?
Please share your ideas first.
Yes, that would be the most sensible response.If Russia nukes UK, the USA should nuke Canada.
And rightfully so. After all, it was the UK that perpetuated the war with Ukraine. Well, Boris Johnson and Victoria Nuland. But Biden/Nuland are no longer in charge and nobody takes John Bolton seriously so Trump can wipe the slate clean for America's part. That leaves the UK holding the bag. Check your cross hairs, Putin ..... and fire!Many Russian strategists believe ....... they can attack UK with impunity.

You are wrong. Russia will always be the last man standing in any war. I repeat: Russia will always be the last man standing in any war.There are no winners in a nuclear war.
I would hope the response would be an unprecedented level of indifference.Please share your ideas first.
It it plays out this way, and stops there, it is a win for all mankind.Both USA and Russia have roughly 5000 nukes.
If Russia nukes UK, we maybe nuke Moscow…but then DC gets nuked.
Do we have Patriot batteries that can take out ICBMs?