How they cheat. If you do not vote, you will be "voted" for Kamala. Trump campaign needs to articulate this...

[BULLDOG]

How can you disprove or prove when the "judge" won't allow it, and then goes out and claims "no evidence" because she didn't allow any....

Then you present it.

 

[DukeU]

Or not.
Giuliani told Arizona official ‘We just don’t have the evidence’ of voter fraud. Former Trump lawyer acknowledged his efforts to overturn the election were based on mere ‘theories’, officials recall.

First of all, it started with election laws being illegally changed using the courts.

 

[EMH]

Then you present it.

HELLO!

You cannot do that if the JUDGE does not allow it to be presented...

DUH...

 

[alang1216]

The late night vote spikes in PA were well documented. No judge in PA was willing to allow them to be presented.

You are a sick election fraud supporter. You are not an American. You are a traitor.

Yes, well documented but not evidence of fraud. Sorry.

 

[alang1216]

First of all, it started with election laws being illegally changed using the courts.

I think if you go through our court system, the result is, by definition, legal.

 

[BULLDOG]

First of all, it started with election laws being illegally changed using the courts.

The courts found the changes weren't illegal. If you disagree, take it to the supreme court.

 

[Kilroy2]

/——/
View attachment 1020739

You are a parrot of lies. There was testimony and affidavits filed that many counted "ballots" were completely obvious frauds...

sources but my guess is you do not have one as you would have posted it.

So are you lying or making it up.

testimony or affidavits are fine in a legal setting but does it change the results is the question.

How many testimonies or affidavits are you talking about. Name your source with the count

if you find a few and it does not change the outcome then it is just whining that your guy lost.

 

[BULLDOG]

HELLO!

You cannot do that if the JUDGE does not allow it to be presented...

DUH...

Did the judge tell you that you can't present your proof on a discussion board? Really?

 

[DukeU]

The courts found the changes weren't illegal. If you disagree, take it to the supreme court.

I can read.

The courts can't change election laws, it's in the Constitution.

They changed the laws ILLEGALLY.

Read it sometime.

 

[EMH]

Did the judge tell you that you can't present your proof on a discussion board? Really?

Typical MORON who doesn't understand the practice of law in America...

 

[BULLDOG]

I can read.

The courts can't change election laws, it's in the Constitution.

They changed the laws ILLEGALLY.

Read it sometime.

The courts are charged with determining if a law is legal. The constitution gave them that authority.

 

[DukeU]

The courts are charged with determining if a law is legal. The constitution gave them that authority.

The courts can't change election laws.

They done this ILLEGALLY and nothing was done about it.

Educate yourself, or not.

 

[BULLDOG]

Typical MORON who doesn't understand the practice of law in America...

You don't need a law license to present your case on a discussion board, silly.

 

[BULLDOG]

The courts can't change election laws.

They done this ILLEGALLY and nothing was done about it.

Educate yourself, or not.

No it's in the constitution dumb ass. Our lawmakers change the laws. Courts just interpret them.

 

[DukeU]

No it's in the constitution dumb ass. Our lawmakers change the laws. Courts just interpret them.

OK, smart guy.

I guess it's or not for you.

Courts Rule States Did Not Follow Their Own Election Laws In 2020​

 

[BULLDOG]

OK, smart guy.

I guess it's or not for you.

Courts Rule States Did Not Follow Their Own Election Laws In 2020​

Now you have something. What happened next?

 

[DukeU]

Now you have something. What happened next?

More illegal activity.

 

[BULLDOG]

More illegal activity.

That's not very specific, is it?

 

[skye]

 

[Skylar]

It is very simple. At the end of the election, the cheaters see how many registered voters are unvoted. Those are counted for Kamala and a fudge "ballot" is produced to document that.


Registered voters who do not vote are, in reality, voting for Kamala.

The Trump campaign needs to explain that in great detail.

The Trump campaign needs to explain your imagination in great detail?