How the Sausage Gets Made at Fake Information Website Wikipedia

[Weatherman2020]

Wikipedia does the same damned thing with climate change and other such subjects. It is about as reliable as Google. And people who use those sorts of “sources” are idiots.

 

[rightwinger]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

Sure it is, and I don’t doubt you think Wiki is reliable, you’re an unthinking gullible Leftard. The OP shows disinformation being made.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

Sure it is, and I don’t doubt you think Wiki is reliable, you’re an unthinking gullible Leftard. The OP shows disinformation being made.

20 yrs ago wasn't it heralded the web was going to make us wayyyy smarter.......................................LOLOLOLOLOL

I do like it for quick reference on people and history

 

[rightwinger]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

Sure it is, and I don’t doubt you think Wiki is reliable, you’re an unthinking gullible Leftard. The OP shows disinformation being made.

Let’s see……
Should I trust Wikipedia or the RW Media?


I think I’ll go with Wiki

 

[Weatherman2020]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

Sure it is, and I don’t doubt you think Wiki is reliable, you’re an unthinking gullible Leftard. The OP shows disinformation being made.

Let’s see……
Should I trust Wikipedia or the RW Media?


I think I’ll go with Wiki

Hilarious. Typical brainwashed submissive Leftist.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

Sure it is, and I don’t doubt you think Wiki is reliable, you’re an unthinking gullible Leftard. The OP shows disinformation being made.

Let’s see……
Should I trust Wikipedia or the RW Media?


I think I’ll go with Wiki

Hilarious. Typical brainwashed submissive Leftist.

It is truly remarkable how brainwashed and full of green puss their heads are, like a big boil on the shoulders

He'd doesn't trust RW media because they are usually right......lolol

 

[Weatherman2020]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

Sure it is, and I don’t doubt you think Wiki is reliable, you’re an unthinking gullible Leftard. The OP shows disinformation being made.

Let’s see……
Should I trust Wikipedia or the RW Media?


I think I’ll go with Wiki

Tell you what, Sparky. You let us know which university- even the worst, most leftist university you can find - allows Wiki as a source.

 

[rightwinger]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

Sure it is, and I don’t doubt you think Wiki is reliable, you’re an unthinking gullible Leftard. The OP shows disinformation being made.

Let’s see……
Should I trust Wikipedia or the RW Media?


I think I’ll go with Wiki

Hilarious. Typical brainwashed submissive Leftist.

Name a better internet encyclopedia

 

[rightwinger]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

Sure it is, and I don’t doubt you think Wiki is reliable, you’re an unthinking gullible Leftard. The OP shows disinformation being made.

Let’s see……
Should I trust Wikipedia or the RW Media?


I think I’ll go with Wiki

Tell you what, Sparky. You let us know which university- even the worst, most leftist university you can find - allows Wiki as a source.

Don‘t really care
If they don’t accept Wiki, they will accept their sources

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I'm reminded of the old Stalinist quote:

"He who makes the sausage decides nothing. He who hides the sausage decides everything".

 

[Weatherman2020]

I think Wikipedia does a great job
Its articles are referenced and up to date.
Misinformation is generally flagged as suspect and corrected.

Sure it is, and I don’t doubt you think Wiki is reliable, you’re an unthinking gullible Leftard. The OP shows disinformation being made.

Let’s see……
Should I trust Wikipedia or the RW Media?


I think I’ll go with Wiki

Tell you what, Sparky. You let us know which university- even the worst, most leftist university you can find - allows Wiki as a source.

Don‘t really care
If they don’t accept Wiki, they will accept their sources

Why should no one use Wiki as a source?


It says so on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia says, “We do not expect you to trust us.” It adds that it is “not a primary source” and that “because some articles may contain errors,” you should “not use Wikipedia to make critical decisions.”

Furthermore, as Wikipedia notes in its “About” section, “Users should be aware that not all articles are of encyclopedic quality from the start: they may contain false or debatable information.”

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

View attachment 510562
Wikipedia does the same damned thing with climate change and other such subjects. It is about as reliable as Google. And people who use those sorts of “sources” are idiots.

I thought the sausage got made with faggots, not Wiki Diki