cgd75 said:
so, the consensus here looks like, to me, that you CANNOT teach abstinence.
Yet, this administration has poured in tax dollars HAND OVER FIST, for abstinence education.
I just read the whole thread, and I did not see any such consensus. If there is consensus, it is that parents shouldn't
wait for the schools to teach abstinence to their kids; that parents need to start the teaching process themselves when the kids are young. Not that the schools
can't do it. Abstinence-ed groups, btw, were a response by parents to the way some schools were handling sex ed- condom handouts, etc.
My opinion, and my practice with my own child was not to focus specifically on the sex/no sex issue. Somewhat akin to what Nienna was saying, I started putting the idea in her head early on that it is very important to have the respect of others, and people who let us others use them quickly lose respect. Self-respect plummets as well; a vicous cycle. This can happen from sexual activity at a young age, and from other risky behaviors as well.
All that, added to our hopefully being an example ourselves as married and faithful to each other, Christian values learned at Church, and someone being home after school to show we are totally in her life, is our particular four-pronged approach.
None of which
guarantees anything. But I need to know that I acted responsibly as a parent and did everything I could to send her on a path where she values herself, and sees the big picture- including how her future could be much, much tougher if she makes bad choices.
I would never leave such sensitive topics to the schools to handle all alone. Often, these are taught by a health/phys ed teacher who can even be, as was the case for our daughter, also an assistant football coach. But if the whole topic of sex is to be discussed, you'd better believe I want abstinence presented front and center (so to speak).