Horrible Ethnic Cleansing Of Palestinians

[Challenger]

Just imagine . . . an entire country full of people like you find here on the forum.

Sayanim and Bodlim? Yes, I can, it's called "Israel"

 

[Challenger]

Raising the flag of surrender. Good choice.

Yup, you are quite right, I give up, George Carlin was right.

 

[Hollie]

Just imagine . . . an entire country full of people like you find here on the forum.

Sayanim and Bodlim? Yes, I can, it's called "Israel"

You are among the few angry, self-hating islamo's who spend an inordinate amount of time flailing your Pom Poms for an Islamist terrorist cabal that wants " statehood".

I'm afraid your hope for that wished for Joooooo genocide is just not going to happen. And as time goes by, tolerance in the modern, first world for islamo welfare cheats and terrorists is waning.

When ISIS begins their gee-had against the squatters in Gaza, will you still blame the Joooooos?

 

[Hollie]

Raising the flag of surrender. Good choice.

Yup, you are quite right, I give up, George Carlin was right.

You gave up because you're a surrender monkey.

Wage war, suffer a humiliating loss and cry foul when you get your nose rubbed in the dirt.

There's a good islamo.

 

[ChrisL]

Just imagine . . . an entire country full of people like you find here on the forum.

Sayanim and Bodlim? Yes, I can, it's called "Israel"

Lol. Well, you are one of the ones I'm talking about!

 

[Roudy]

et al,

I tend to think that most pro-Palestinians don't actually understand "ethnic cleansing" as it pertains to the criminal activity. There is no crime called "ethnic cleansing;" in the international criminal code (Part II - Article 6 Rome Statutes) it is called "Genocide."

Introduction With respect to the last element listed for each crime:

(a) The term “in the context of” would include the initial acts in an emerging pattern;
(b) The term “manifest” is an objective qualification;
(c) Notwithstanding the normal requirement for a mental element provided for in article 30, and recognizing that knowledge of the circumstances will usually be addressed in proving genocidal intent, the appropriate requirement, if any, for a mental element regarding this circumstance will need to be decided by the Court on a case-by-case basis.
​

Article 6 (a) Genocide by killing Elements

1. The perpetrator killed one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

Article 6 (b) Genocide by causing serious bodily or mental harm Elements

1. The perpetrator caused serious bodily or mental harm to one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

I think that most people, relative to the Palestinian Conflict, don't actually know how this applies; especially to the Policies Expressed by the Palestinians. The Palestinians actually have a governmental policy to implement hostilities (Jihad) against Israelis.

While there is a sever problem with the Israeli Settlers committing heinous crimes against Palestinians, it is not really a governmental induced or supported effort to directed against Palestinians to effect such destruction; in whole or in part. However, the Israelis understand that the activities of Jewish Extremism are not helping --- but hurting Israel and it citizenry in the eyes of the global community and that Israel's Security Cabinet will be forced to impose a very stern set of crime prevention and criminal enforcement measures if it is to bring the situation under control.

Most Respectfully,
R

I think you'll find although there is no crime specifically called "Ethnic Cleansing" what the Zionists did in 1947-48 and still do to this date is covered by Article 7 in your link. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

What the Zionists did in 1948 is they defended themselves against the Arab savages who attacked Israel in order to destroy it.

Can we hear a praise to the Allah on that one?

No they didn't. More Rude-ee B.S. The Arab armies entered Palestine in order to prevent the creation of a Zionist Jewish state and the ethnic cleansing of the native population. Abdullah of Jordan was even colluding with the Zionists to split Palestine between them, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. The Lebanese Christian rulers marched their army up to the Litani, fired a few shells over the river then ran away as soon as the IDF appeared, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. Syrian and Egyptian forces were the only ones to enter territory that would have been allocated to the "Jewish" state by the U.N. resolution and their attacks were half hearted at best.

1948 A History of the First Arab-Israeli War Amazon.co.uk Benny Morris 9780300151121 Books

Ha ha ha ha. You just linked to a book and then made up your own bullshit story as to what happened. You are truly pathetic.

The Arab armies threatened the Arabs aka Palestinians (no such thing back then of course) in the way, who later called themselves Palestinians, to get out of the way such that they could attack Israel. Some did, while others joined them. the Arabs suffered a humiliating defeat, however they did end up keeping the so called Palestinians in miserable conditions in the West Bank and Gaza for 20 years, after which they attacked the Jewish state once again in 1967, and ended up giving back the land they occupied.

The book you linked to will confirm that.

 

[Roudy]

It's really difficult to feel sorry for the Palestinians considering that they elect thugs/terrorists and the constant lobbing of rockets into Israel with the intent of causing harm. I think they bring it on themselves and if they behaved like civil human beings, they wouldn't be suffering right now. Israel has even given them supplies and goods to help them out, and they have been known to destroy such diplomatic efforts. It's like dealing with insane people. Just imagine . . . an entire country full of people like you find here on the forum.

Exactly.

 

[Roudy]

Just imagine . . . an entire country full of people like you find here on the forum.

Sayanim and Bodlim? Yes, I can, it's called "Israel"

You are among the few angry, self-hating islamo's who spend an inordinate amount of time flailing your Pom Poms for an Islamist terrorist cabal that wants " statehood".

I'm afraid your hope for that wished for Joooooo genocide is just not going to happen. And as time goes by, tolerance in the modern, first world for islamo welfare cheats and terrorists is waning.

When ISIS begins their gee-had against the squatters in Gaza, will you still blame the Joooooos?

Yes, the sock will claim that ISIS is an Israeli creation. LOL

 

[Phoenall]

et al,

I tend to think that most pro-Palestinians don't actually understand "ethnic cleansing" as it pertains to the criminal activity. There is no crime called "ethnic cleansing;" in the international criminal code (Part II - Article 6 Rome Statutes) it is called "Genocide."

Introduction With respect to the last element listed for each crime:

(a) The term “in the context of” would include the initial acts in an emerging pattern;
(b) The term “manifest” is an objective qualification;
(c) Notwithstanding the normal requirement for a mental element provided for in article 30, and recognizing that knowledge of the circumstances will usually be addressed in proving genocidal intent, the appropriate requirement, if any, for a mental element regarding this circumstance will need to be decided by the Court on a case-by-case basis.
​

Article 6 (a) Genocide by killing Elements

1. The perpetrator killed one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

Article 6 (b) Genocide by causing serious bodily or mental harm Elements

1. The perpetrator caused serious bodily or mental harm to one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

I think that most people, relative to the Palestinian Conflict, don't actually know how this applies; especially to the Policies Expressed by the Palestinians. The Palestinians actually have a governmental policy to implement hostilities (Jihad) against Israelis.

While there is a sever problem with the Israeli Settlers committing heinous crimes against Palestinians, it is not really a governmental induced or supported effort to directed against Palestinians to effect such destruction; in whole or in part. However, the Israelis understand that the activities of Jewish Extremism are not helping --- but hurting Israel and it citizenry in the eyes of the global community and that Israel's Security Cabinet will be forced to impose a very stern set of crime prevention and criminal enforcement measures if it is to bring the situation under control.

Most Respectfully,
R

I think you'll find although there is no crime specifically called "Ethnic Cleansing" what the Zionists did in 1947-48 and still do to this date is covered by Article 7 in your link. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

What the Zionists did in 1948 is they defended themselves against the Arab savages who attacked Israel in order to destroy it.

Can we hear a praise to the Allah on that one?

No they didn't. More Rude-ee B.S. The Arab armies entered Palestine in order to prevent the creation of a Zionist Jewish state and the ethnic cleansing of the native population. Abdullah of Jordan was even colluding with the Zionists to split Palestine between them, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. The Lebanese Christian rulers marched their army up to the Litani, fired a few shells over the river then ran away as soon as the IDF appeared, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. Syrian and Egyptian forces were the only ones to enter territory that would have been allocated to the "Jewish" state by the U.N. resolution and their attacks were half hearted at best.

1948 A History of the First Arab-Israeli War Amazon.co.uk Benny Morris 9780300151121 Books

that is the islamonazi propaganda account that only came about because they were soundly beat. The arab league should have been attacked by the massed forces of the UN and their lands confiscated for the attack on a sovereign nation. Their boasts show that they were intent on a genocide and ethnic cleansing. So the evidence points to the Jews defending against the complete destruction of what was theirs and the mass murder of every Jew in the M.E.

 

[Phoenall]

et al,

I tend to think that most pro-Palestinians don't actually understand "ethnic cleansing" as it pertains to the criminal activity. There is no crime called "ethnic cleansing;" in the international criminal code (Part II - Article 6 Rome Statutes) it is called "Genocide."

Introduction With respect to the last element listed for each crime:

(a) The term “in the context of” would include the initial acts in an emerging pattern;
(b) The term “manifest” is an objective qualification;
(c) Notwithstanding the normal requirement for a mental element provided for in article 30, and recognizing that knowledge of the circumstances will usually be addressed in proving genocidal intent, the appropriate requirement, if any, for a mental element regarding this circumstance will need to be decided by the Court on a case-by-case basis.
​

Article 6 (a) Genocide by killing Elements

1. The perpetrator killed one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

Article 6 (b) Genocide by causing serious bodily or mental harm Elements

1. The perpetrator caused serious bodily or mental harm to one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

I think that most people, relative to the Palestinian Conflict, don't actually know how this applies; especially to the Policies Expressed by the Palestinians. The Palestinians actually have a governmental policy to implement hostilities (Jihad) against Israelis.

While there is a sever problem with the Israeli Settlers committing heinous crimes against Palestinians, it is not really a governmental induced or supported effort to directed against Palestinians to effect such destruction; in whole or in part. However, the Israelis understand that the activities of Jewish Extremism are not helping --- but hurting Israel and it citizenry in the eyes of the global community and that Israel's Security Cabinet will be forced to impose a very stern set of crime prevention and criminal enforcement measures if it is to bring the situation under control.

Most Respectfully,
R

I think you'll find although there is no crime specifically called "Ethnic Cleansing" what the Zionists did in 1947-48 and still do to this date is covered by Article 7 in your link. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

What the Zionists did in 1948 is they defended themselves against the Arab savages who attacked Israel in order to destroy it.

Can we hear a praise to the Allah on that one?

No they didn't. More Rude-ee B.S. The Arab armies entered Palestine in order to prevent the creation of a Zionist Jewish state and the ethnic cleansing of the native population. Abdullah of Jordan was even colluding with the Zionists to split Palestine between them, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. The Lebanese Christian rulers marched their army up to the Litani, fired a few shells over the river then ran away as soon as the IDF appeared, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. Syrian and Egyptian forces were the only ones to enter territory that would have been allocated to the "Jewish" state by the U.N. resolution and their attacks were half hearted at best.

1948 A History of the First Arab-Israeli War Amazon.co.uk Benny Morris 9780300151121 Books

Umm. No. The Arab beggars and squatters were pushed aside so that the A-rab armies could complete their hoped for Joooooooo genocide.

No facts based on historical evidence and the accounts of arab muslim Palestinians.

 

[Phoenall]

Just imagine . . . an entire country full of people like you find here on the forum.

Sayanim and Bodlim? Yes, I can, it's called "Israel"

As it would be if the arab league had managed to wipe out the Jews.

 

[Challenger]

et al,

I tend to think that most pro-Palestinians don't actually understand "ethnic cleansing" as it pertains to the criminal activity. There is no crime called "ethnic cleansing;" in the international criminal code (Part II - Article 6 Rome Statutes) it is called "Genocide."

Introduction With respect to the last element listed for each crime:

(a) The term “in the context of” would include the initial acts in an emerging pattern;
(b) The term “manifest” is an objective qualification;
(c) Notwithstanding the normal requirement for a mental element provided for in article 30, and recognizing that knowledge of the circumstances will usually be addressed in proving genocidal intent, the appropriate requirement, if any, for a mental element regarding this circumstance will need to be decided by the Court on a case-by-case basis.
​

Article 6 (a) Genocide by killing Elements

1. The perpetrator killed one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

Article 6 (b) Genocide by causing serious bodily or mental harm Elements

1. The perpetrator caused serious bodily or mental harm to one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

I think that most people, relative to the Palestinian Conflict, don't actually know how this applies; especially to the Policies Expressed by the Palestinians. The Palestinians actually have a governmental policy to implement hostilities (Jihad) against Israelis.

While there is a sever problem with the Israeli Settlers committing heinous crimes against Palestinians, it is not really a governmental induced or supported effort to directed against Palestinians to effect such destruction; in whole or in part. However, the Israelis understand that the activities of Jewish Extremism are not helping --- but hurting Israel and it citizenry in the eyes of the global community and that Israel's Security Cabinet will be forced to impose a very stern set of crime prevention and criminal enforcement measures if it is to bring the situation under control.

Most Respectfully,
R

I think you'll find although there is no crime specifically called "Ethnic Cleansing" what the Zionists did in 1947-48 and still do to this date is covered by Article 7 in your link. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

What the Zionists did in 1948 is they defended themselves against the Arab savages who attacked Israel in order to destroy it.

Can we hear a praise to the Allah on that one?

No they didn't. More Rude-ee B.S. The Arab armies entered Palestine in order to prevent the creation of a Zionist Jewish state and the ethnic cleansing of the native population. Abdullah of Jordan was even colluding with the Zionists to split Palestine between them, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. The Lebanese Christian rulers marched their army up to the Litani, fired a few shells over the river then ran away as soon as the IDF appeared, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. Syrian and Egyptian forces were the only ones to enter territory that would have been allocated to the "Jewish" state by the U.N. resolution and their attacks were half hearted at best.

1948 A History of the First Arab-Israeli War Amazon.co.uk Benny Morris 9780300151121 Books

Ha ha ha ha. You just linked to a book and then made up your own bullshit story as to what happened. You are truly pathetic.

The Arab armies threatened the Arabs aka Palestinians (no such thing back then of course) in the way, who later called themselves Palestinians, to get out of the way such that they could attack Israel. Some did, while others joined them. the Arabs suffered a humiliating defeat, however they did end up keeping the so called Palestinians in miserable conditions in the West Bank and Gaza for 20 years, after which they attacked the Jewish state once again in 1967, and ended up giving back the land they occupied.

The book you linked to will confirm that.

No it won't. But then again you'd have to have read the book to know that.

 

[MJB12741]

The Arab country ethnic cleansing of their Palestinians is disgusting. While I respect Israel for allowing them a safe haven from their Arab brothers, I resent the fact the Palestinians thank Israel with hatred, annihilation threats & rocket missiles.

 

[Phoenall]

et al,

I tend to think that most pro-Palestinians don't actually understand "ethnic cleansing" as it pertains to the criminal activity. There is no crime called "ethnic cleansing;" in the international criminal code (Part II - Article 6 Rome Statutes) it is called "Genocide."

Introduction With respect to the last element listed for each crime:

(a) The term “in the context of” would include the initial acts in an emerging pattern;
(b) The term “manifest” is an objective qualification;
(c) Notwithstanding the normal requirement for a mental element provided for in article 30, and recognizing that knowledge of the circumstances will usually be addressed in proving genocidal intent, the appropriate requirement, if any, for a mental element regarding this circumstance will need to be decided by the Court on a case-by-case basis.
​

Article 6 (a) Genocide by killing Elements

1. The perpetrator killed one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

Article 6 (b) Genocide by causing serious bodily or mental harm Elements

1. The perpetrator caused serious bodily or mental harm to one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
3. The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
4. The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction.
​

I think that most people, relative to the Palestinian Conflict, don't actually know how this applies; especially to the Policies Expressed by the Palestinians. The Palestinians actually have a governmental policy to implement hostilities (Jihad) against Israelis.

While there is a sever problem with the Israeli Settlers committing heinous crimes against Palestinians, it is not really a governmental induced or supported effort to directed against Palestinians to effect such destruction; in whole or in part. However, the Israelis understand that the activities of Jewish Extremism are not helping --- but hurting Israel and it citizenry in the eyes of the global community and that Israel's Security Cabinet will be forced to impose a very stern set of crime prevention and criminal enforcement measures if it is to bring the situation under control.

Most Respectfully,
R

I think you'll find although there is no crime specifically called "Ethnic Cleansing" what the Zionists did in 1947-48 and still do to this date is covered by Article 7 in your link. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

What the Zionists did in 1948 is they defended themselves against the Arab savages who attacked Israel in order to destroy it.

Can we hear a praise to the Allah on that one?

No they didn't. More Rude-ee B.S. The Arab armies entered Palestine in order to prevent the creation of a Zionist Jewish state and the ethnic cleansing of the native population. Abdullah of Jordan was even colluding with the Zionists to split Palestine between them, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. The Lebanese Christian rulers marched their army up to the Litani, fired a few shells over the river then ran away as soon as the IDF appeared, so no attempt to destroy Israel from that direction. Syrian and Egyptian forces were the only ones to enter territory that would have been allocated to the "Jewish" state by the U.N. resolution and their attacks were half hearted at best.

1948 A History of the First Arab-Israeli War Amazon.co.uk Benny Morris 9780300151121 Books

Ha ha ha ha. You just linked to a book and then made up your own bullshit story as to what happened. You are truly pathetic.

The Arab armies threatened the Arabs aka Palestinians (no such thing back then of course) in the way, who later called themselves Palestinians, to get out of the way such that they could attack Israel. Some did, while others joined them. the Arabs suffered a humiliating defeat, however they did end up keeping the so called Palestinians in miserable conditions in the West Bank and Gaza for 20 years, after which they attacked the Jewish state once again in 1967, and ended up giving back the land they occupied.

The book you linked to will confirm that.

No it won't. But then again you'd have to have read the book to know that.

Why don't you just post the relevant facts so we can destroy your argument, or is this why you refuse to do this because you know we have access to this reading material and will pounce from a great height.

 

[Coyote]

The OP already has multiple threads on this topic - please continue this discussion here: A 21st Century Genocide US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Thread closed.