SuperDemocrat
Gold Member
- Mar 4, 2015
- 8,200
- 869
- 275
- Banned
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Broglio spoke at the National Organization for Marriageās (NOM) fourth annual March for Marriage on Sept. 25 against same-sex marriage. āI think some of the detrimental effects include people not being able to act according to their fundamental religious beliefs,ā he told CNSNews.com in an interview prior to the march on Saturday. āI think thereās a certain pressure on those who uphold marriage as being between a man and a woman, theyāre being pressured to change that belief,ā said the archbishop. āCertainly people who work in areas, in service industries, are being also forced to compromise their religious beliefs, all of which at least, in my humble estimation, go against the First Amendment.ā
The archbishop added that there is a tendency to ālabel anything that people disagree with as untenable or unacceptable and therefore hate speech, and thatās a problem because, of course, weāre required to teach the truth in love as Saint Paul told us.ā
CNSNews.com asked Archbishop Broglio why it was important to him to come march for the issue a year after the Supreme Court decision in June 2015. āI think obviously standing for one man and one woman marriage is an important element of Catholic faith,ā he replied, āand for that reason itās important to use whatever catechetical moment we have to underline that and reiterate the importance of that truth.ā
Military Bishop: Same-Sex Marriage Ruling Means āPeople Not Able to Act According to Their Fundamental Religious Beliefsā
U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves said that the recusals on religious grounds granted by the state's so-called "Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act", or House Bill 1523, violated the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 2015 ruling legalizing gay marriage. The Supreme Court's decision is commonly referred to as the "Obergefell" case after lead plaintiff James Obergefell. "Mississippi's elected officials may disagree with Obergefell, of course, and may express that disagreement as they see fit - by advocating for a constitutional amendment to overturn the decision, for example," Reeves wrote in his 16-page ruling, which came in response to a lawsuit filed by the Campaign for Southern Equality. "But the marriage license issue will not be adjudicated anew after each legislative session," Reeves wrote. Mississippi is among a handful of Southern U.S. states on the front lines of legal battles over equality, privacy and religious freedom.
Reeves has not yet ruled on other provisions of the state legislation, which is expected to become law on Friday and also contains a set of religious objections provisions that have been challenged in four separate lawsuits. But Mississippi's lieutenant governor, Tate Reeves, quickly slammed the ruling in a written statement. "If this opinion by the federal court denies even one Mississippian of their fundamental right to practice their religion, then all Mississippians are denied their 1st Amendment rights,ā Reeves said. "I hope the stateās attorneys will quickly appeal this decision to the 5th Circuit to protect the deeply held religious beliefs of all Mississippians."
A spokesman for the Campaign for Southern Equality, meanwhile, said the group was "delighted" with the decision and expected the judge to rule in their favor on its challenges to the entirety of the HB 1523.
Mississippi clerks cannot claim religious exception to gay marriage: judge