"High School Teacher Teaches That ALL Whites Are Guilty of Racism; Why is This Not Itself Racist?"
Look up the definition of racism and you'll see why and you'll see why it isn't.
rac·ism
(rā′sĭz′əm)
n.
1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability
and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice
based on race.
Ok,
so what is your point? What the teacher stated is still very racist to my perspective.
Red:
Well, look at the definition you provided. The teacher's remarks do not indicate s/he espouses racist attitudes or behaviors. What the teacher did is tell his/her students that all whites are guilty of racism. The teacher did nothing to show that his/her own attitudes align with thinking that any race of people is superior to others by dint of race alone.
- Declaring that a class of people are racist is not to discriminate against them. To racially discriminate against one or a group is to take a action -- to deny or grant a job, an opportunity, safety, health, life, etc. -- toward them based on the fact that they are of a given race or not a member of a given race. What did the teacher do that denies one or several white folks any such thing? Nothing.
- Did the teacher express that s/he thinks whites are superior or inferior to non-whites because of their being white? No.
Thus my point is that given the very definition of racism, the teacher's remarks are not racist. You see, not every controversial or potentially pejorative statement that has some element of race in it is racist. Is it racist if I say/believe, "Black folks are good at swimming and not good at lacrosse, whereas whites are the opposite," and my basis for saying that is merely because of the race of the individuals, my statement is racist. If instead my basis for that is, say, because black folks have webbed fingers and toes, or some innate trait that enhances swimming and compromises one's ability to hold a lacrosse stick, it's not racist at all.
What that teacher did was describe what s/he sees as the nature of white folks without, as least as far as we can tell by the news story, providing any evidence that credibly shows the description to be so. Accordingly, I can see the remarks as being empty generalizations, but alone and absent any further detail, I don't see them as racist. Race matters are quite important in the U.S.; however, for as important as they are, it seems to me that few folks of all races bother to consume information pertaining to race other than their own anecdotal observations and whatever sensational news stories they happen upon. That is a great disservice not only to themselves, but also to the rest of the citizenry.
Off Topic:
Another problem that I've noticed in many discussions here on USMB, but that pretty much doesn't occur in my "real world" life is folks' penchant for assuming that when one says "X is such and such," one necessarily also means "That which is not X is not such and such." For example, in threads where I've entreated for discussion about, say, Donald Trump, folks for some strange reason feel obliged to remark upon Hillary Clinton. The same thing happens with regard to myriad topics. It happens so much that I've come to think that there is an immensely huge share of Americans who quite simply cannot or will not remark upon the topic under discussion and yet for "God only knows what reason," they just have to say something.
I can say that when my teachers, my clients, my friends, my colleagues ask me about something or remark on something, I address the topic at hand, not something else. Think about that for a moment....just how successful would one be, for example, were one to:
- As a fast food restaurant cashier, be asked about the burgers and respond about the chicken sandwich?
- As a plumber, be asked about the toilet and respond about the sink?
- As a doctor, be asked about appendicitis and respond about gallstones?
As absurd as that sounds, that is essentially what folks here do time and time again. Just moments ago, I encountered exactly that behavior again.
I think in discussions about race, that sort of thinking -- something positive or negative said about one race is taken to mean the opposite isn't so about non-members of that race -- prevails, resulting in questions such as the one in your thread title. Was that thought process going on in your mind, OP? I don't know. Was it?