Zone1 Here's Why White Guilt About Slavery Is Insane

[Hector12]

Guy, Jews are a religion, not a race.

* Jews ae bith.

You mean some debunked racist who got tossed out of academia years ago?

He was never debunked. If he was fired from his university, it was because he could not be refuted.

Um, no, guy, you seem to miss the point of why police murdering black people is offensive.

I could explain it to you again, but you probably still wouldn't get it.

You have nothing to give.

 

[Hector12]

No one is safe with certain character's of humans, and that goes also for any race in this world.

Within any race their are evil bad people, and their are good people.

Gangs usually bring about bad behaviors in humans that unfortunately unify their members under certain types of culture's or beliefs. This is what drives such gangs either in good ways or in bad ways, yet it's all depending on the type of gang it is.

Has nothing to do with color, but everything to do with beliefs and the type of character that leads the gang or it's belief system.

Dark skin color does not cause violent behavior. It does correlate with it.

 

[EdwinAMartin]

Explain the prosecution of the other officer's that had nothing to do with a knee on the upper chest shoulder if it wasn't political ?? You know it was all political, and that's why you have to stay in the leftist corner no matter what.

I will give you this - Once Floyd was no longer a threat, the officer's should have went into medical emergency mode.

Watching the previous 10 minutes of Floyd's asshole activities, he got better than he deserved. He was very physical. He was treated well considering his resistance. I would have tazed him the first minute.

 

[EdwinAMartin]

Guy, Jews are a religion, not a race.

It is also an ethnic group, and not necessarily a religious group.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Thorough investigation? They just repeated what the state investigators had found.

The whole argument is that because the holes in his shirt lined up with the holes in his chest, that means he couldn't have had his hands up. This would be true if his hands were straight up above his head. But if he just had them up bent at the elbow (like most people would do it) it wouldn't pull up his shirt.

The problem here was that the Obama DOJ just wanted this to go away after they got people riled up, because they were reluctant to overrule state prosecutors.



You do realize that 2.2 per 1000 is a pretty insignificant number, right, Lisa?

That is not the whole argument you dumb ************

They dsid not repeat anything. They examined the same evidence and came to the same conslusion beaiuuse it IS the correct conclusion proven by evidence.

The placement of all the wounds on Brown were consistent with someone running towards the shooter. They woyuld not have been caused by being shot while standing still with ones hands in the air

The witnesses you keep referring to ranted and / or contradicted themselves many times over destroying theor credibility. In addition they were proven to be liars when it was determined they DID NOT witness anything. They were not present

Furthermore the absolute fact is that all of the physical evidence proves the hands up myth IS A MYTH

You are seriously an idiotic liar when you try to claim otherwise

What the **** is wrong with your perveted brain that you have to lie like a ******* juvenile?

The micheal brown shooting was self defense and that is settled fact

 

[Soupnazi630]

Guy, Jews are a religion, not a race.



You mean some debunked racist who got tossed out of academia years ago?


Um, no, guy, you seem to miss the point of why police murdering black people is offensive.

I could explain it to you again, but you probably still wouldn't get it.

Your lies are MORE offensive

 

[JoeB131]

It is also an ethnic group, and not necessarily a religious group.

But it's the religion that makes them do stupid shit, like,

"Hey, let's steal someone else's land because God said so!"

 

[JoeB131]

That is not the whole argument you dumb ************

They dsid not repeat anything. They examined the same evidence and came to the same conslusion beaiuuse it IS the correct conclusion proven by evidence.

Nope, the FBI went in there like bureaucrats, and took the path of least resistance.

The placement of all the wounds on Brown were consistent with someone running towards the shooter. They woyuld not have been caused by being shot while standing still with ones hands in the air

Actually, they were consisiten with someone bein shot in the chest, and then being shot through the top of the head as he doubled over.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/independent-autopsy-shows-no-sign-of-struggle-in-michael-browns-shooting-1408381747

A former New York City medical examiner found "no evidence of a struggle" between Michael Brown and the police officer who shot him at least six times on Aug. 9—an encounter that has sparked more than a week of unrest in this St. Louis suburb.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nope, the FBI went in there like bureaucrats, and took the path of least resistance.


Actually, they were consisiten with someone bein shot in the chest, and then being shot through the top of the head as he doubled over.

View attachment 1229582

https://www.wsj.com/articles/independent-autopsy-shows-no-sign-of-struggle-in-michael-browns-shooting-1408381747

A former New York City medical examiner found "no evidence of a struggle" between Michael Brown and the police officer who shot him at least six times on Aug. 9—an encounter that has sparked more than a week of unrest in this St. Louis suburb.

Wrong they did a thourough and comprehensive investigation and the evidence proves it was self defense.

Nope they were ONLY consistent with someone running towards the shooter

The FORMER medical examnier ignored key evidence and was paid to lie

You just like because you are uneducates stupid and childish

 

[JoeB131]

Wrong they did a thourough and comprehensive investigation and the evidence proves it was self defense.

Plagarizing what the other guys wrote, sometimes word for word, is not a comprehensive investigation.

 

[Hector12]

But it's the religion that makes them do stupid shit, like,

"Hey, let's steal someone else's land because God said so!"

Jews did not steal anything. Initially they bought land in Palestine. When they were attacked, they fought back and conquered more.

 

[Hector12]

Um, no, guy, you seem to miss the point of why police murdering black people is offensive.

When the police kill a Negro the Negro was a criminal who was resisting arrest. When a Negro kills a white person, the white person was resisting a crime.

 

[JoeB131]

Jews did not steal anything. Initially they bought land in Palestine. When they were attacked, they fought back and conquered more.

You mean they cheated people out of land, and then provoked wars to steal more?

When the police kill a Negro the Negro was a criminal who was resisting arrest. When a Negro kills a white person, the white person was resisting a crime.

Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia!

 

[Hector12]

Guy, Jews are a religion, not a race.

It has probably been decades since Woody Allen attended a synagogue service. He is still Jewish.

----------

"Jewish Genius," by Chares Murray

As soon as Jewish children born under legal emancipation had time to grow to adulthood, they started appearing in the first ranks of the arts and sciences. During the four decades from 1830 to 1870, when the first Jews to live under emancipation reached their forties, 16 significant Jewish figures appear. In the next four decades, from 1870 to 1910, the number jumps to 40. During the next four decades, 1910–1950, despite the contemporaneous devastation of European Jewry, the number of significant figures almost triples, to 114.

To get a sense of the density of accomplishment these numbers represent, I will focus on 1870 onward, after legal emancipation had been achieved throughout Central and Western Europe. How does the actual number of significant figures compare to what would be expected given the Jewish proportion of the European and North American population? From 1870 to 1950, Jewish representation in literature was four times the number one would expect. In music, five times. In the visual arts, five times. In biology, eight times. In chemistry, six times. In physics, nine times. In mathematics, twelve times. In philosophy, fourteen times.

Disproportionate Jewish accomplishment in the arts and sciences continues to this day. My inventories end with 1950, but many other measures are available, of which the best known is the Nobel Prize. In the first half of the 20th century, despite pervasive and continuing social discrimination against Jews throughout the Western world, despite the retraction of legal rights, and despite the Holocaust, Jews won 14 percent of Nobel Prizes in literature, chemistry, physics, and medicine/physiology. In the second half of the 20th century, when Nobel Prizes began to be awarded to people from all over the world, that figure rose to 29 percent. So far, in the 21st century, it has been 32 percent. Jews constitute about two-tenths of one percent of the world’s population. You do the math.

Jewish Genius

W. H. Brady Scholar Charles Murray Since its first issue in 1945, COMMENTARY has published hundreds of articles about Jews and Judaism. As one would expect, they cover just about every important aspect of the...

www.aei.org

 

[Hector12]

You mean they cheated people out of land, and then provoked wars to steal more?

Jews do not need to cheat. Because they are racially superior they outperform their enemies.

 

[JoeB131]

It has probably been decades since Woody Allen attended a synagogue service. He is still Jewish.

It's been years since I've gone to church, but at least culturally, I'm still Catholic. I have Catholic sensibilities and that predisposition about feeling guilty about stuff.

Weak argument.

Jews do not need to cheat.

No, but they sure do enjoy it.

Let's not forget, when the first Jews showed up in Palestine, they didn't announce they were forming their own country. They just asked to move there and live in peace because the European Christians were mean to them.

 

[Hector12]

Let's not forget, when the first Jews showed up in Palestine, they didn't announce they were forming their own country.

Fortunately the Jews did form their own country. It is the most advanced country in the Near East.

 

[yidnar]

Modern woke pseudo-history paints a fabricated story of slavery; that white men came to Africa, stole Africans from their lands, and brought them to America. It was White American men, and only White American men, who were guilty of this, and it was a large majority of them as well. This was unique to the world at the time and in world history, and is a special evil in the history of mankind.

Of course, this is all complete nonsense, and is just woke propaganda we were taught in schools or are being told by politicians or media pundits today. But it's important to look at the context and just how insanely wrong these claims are. Let's look at total number of slaves, for example:

It is absolutely true that the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, in which Africans captured other Africans and sold them, shipped approximately 12.5 million slaves across the Atlantic to the Americas.

The Issue becomes where those slaves were taken. A woke liberal would probably assume that 12.5 million slaves were taken from Africa and sent to the American south. That would be insanely false. The breakdown looks like this:

• 5.4 million were sent to Brazil
• 3.6 million were sent to the Carribean
• 1.2 million were sent to Jamaica
• 900,000 were sent to St. Dominique (French Colony)
• 889,000 were sent to Cuba
• 470,000 were sent to the United States

So in this cry of woke left Democrat social justice warriors... cries of the unique evil of America, white men, etc... they make the claims they do when American only partook in 3% of the Trans-Atlantic Slave trade.

Add to that how there were only about 390,000 slave owners in the USA out of a population of 31 million... and you have approximately 1.2% of the population participating or benefitting from it, yet is that what Democrats, leftists, or educators say, address, or teach?

Slavery is an evil that has existed as long as human history has. All races have been enslaved, many continue to be. As far as America is concerned, it basically happened for 90 years nearly 200 years ago. However, no woke Democrat can legitimately point the finger at the USA as some unique evil in slavery, nor can they say we were any leader in it. They need to point the finger at Africans of the times first, and then all the South American/Brazilian/Carribean nations who were far greater participants.

And this is just the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. Again, Slavery exists across the world at far greater rates throughout history.

So, any person who wants to demonize the USA and White people as a unique evil as far as slavery, or as a major historical cause of it, is just revealing their tragic indoctrination and ignorance of history.

wow ! latinos owe reparations !

 

[yidnar]

Can you quote one wokester saying this OP?

• 5.4 million were sent to Brazil
• 3.6 million were sent to the Carribean
• 1.2 million were sent to Jamaica
• 900,000 were sent to St. Dominique (French Colony)
• 889,000 were sent to Cuba
• 470,000 were sent to the United States

Latinos owe reparations ! go to LA and tell em !

 

[Hector12]

No, but they sure do enjoy it.

You cannot document that. It is obvious to everyone who looks that the minority you make excuses for spreads barbarism and stupidity everywhere it goes.