Here is the OFFICIAL POLICE RECORD from 2019 that led to Kilmar Garcia's court ordered DEPORTATION.

[MarathonMike]

Anyone following the FACTS of the latest manufactured crisis by the Democrats knows Kilmar Garcia was ORDERED BY A US COURT TO DEPORT years ago. Here is the official police record of his arrest that led to the deportation order. I am certain there isn't one single Trump Hater who will read it, since they rely on being spoon fed by their propaganda outlets. But here it is for anyone interested in FACTS.

https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1396906/dl?inline

 

[Donald H]

Americans continue to obsess over this move by the Trump regime.

None can quite find a way to lay it to rest in their minds!

Why is it taking so long to deal with the implications?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Here's your hero Democrats:

 

[Mack The Finger]

Facts don't matter to LIBs only the agenda does.

 

[mudwhistle]

Americans continue to obsess over this move by the Trump regime.

None can quite find a way to lay it to rest in their minds!

Why is it taking so long to deal with the implications?

Why?
Because Democrats wanted an issue.

Simple as that.

This is an attempt to grant amnesty to criminal illegals.

Cut & dried.

 

[San Souci]

Why?
Because Democrats wanted an issue.

Simple as that.

This is an attempt to grant amnesty to criminal illegals.

Cut & dried.

ALL Illegals are Criminals. Regular Americans should form Militias and go Bounty Hunting. $100 a head.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

We paid for his little trip

 

[IM2]

ALL Illegals are Criminals. Regular Americans should form Militias and go Bounty Hunting. $100 a head.

It's a civil crime. And how would you know someone is illegal?

 

[IM2]

Trump was president in 2019.

 

[MarathonMike]

Americans continue to obsess over this move by the Trump regime.

None can quite find a way to lay it to rest in their minds!

Why is it taking so long to deal with the implications?

Once again you are confused, Canadian. It is our corrupt Media working for the Democrat Regime who took this isolated case and turned into the biggest national "tragedy" since George Floyd.

 

[San Souci]

It's a civil crime. And how would you know someone is illegal?

No, It is a fuckin' FEDERAL Crime.

 

[Rumpole]

Anyone following the FACTS of the latest manufactured crisis by the Democrats knows Kilmar Garcia was ORDERED BY A US COURT TO DEPORT years ago. Here is the official police record of his arrest that led to the deportation order. I am certain there isn't one single Trump Hater who will read it, since they rely on being spoon fed by their propaganda outlets. But here it is for anyone interested in FACTS.

https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1396906/dl?inline

The police report proves nothing .Show us the court order. Ah you don't have it well I search for it and apparently it's not online, however If your claim is true about that court order then the following facts would not be true and since they are true it suggests you're incorrect

We know he had legal status because multiple courts took extraordinary steps to protect his rights--steps they would not and could not have taken if he had no legal status. Consider these actions by the court:

1. Court-Ordered Protection Against Deportation – The judiciary ruled that Garcia could not be forcibly removed due to legal protections afforded to him.
2. Federal Appeals Court Intervention – An appellate court upheld Garcia’s legal standing by denying government efforts to revoke previous rulings that ensured his rights.
3. Supreme Court Affirmation – The highest court of the land refused to overturn legal protections granted to Garcia, reinforcing the validity of his status.
4. Acknowledgment of Administrative Error – Federal agencies recognized that Garcia was mistakenly deported, indicating his initial legal status was indeed legitimate.
5. Congressional Advocacy – Sitting U.S. senators publicly advocated for Garcia, further reinforcing his legally recognized position in the United States.

None of this would have happened unless the law first recognized Garcia as a person entitled to its protections. So the notion that he had no legal standing is contradicted by every one of these institutional actions.

 

[MarathonMike]

The police report proves nothing .Show us the court order. Ah you don't have it well I search for it and apparently it's not online, however If your claim is true about that court order then the following facts would not be true and since they are true it suggests you're incorrect

We know he had legal status because multiple courts took extraordinary steps to protect his rights--steps they would not and could not have taken if he had no legal status. Consider these actions by the court:

1. Court-Ordered Protection Against Deportation – The judiciary ruled that Garcia could not be forcibly removed due to legal protections afforded to him.
2. Federal Appeals Court Intervention – An appellate court upheld Garcia’s legal standing by denying government efforts to revoke previous rulings that ensured his rights.
3. Supreme Court Affirmation – The highest court of the land refused to overturn legal protections granted to Garcia, reinforcing the validity of his status.
4. Acknowledgment of Administrative Error – Federal agencies recognized that Garcia was mistakenly deported, indicating his initial legal status was indeed legitimate.
5. Congressional Advocacy – Sitting U.S. senators publicly advocated for Garcia, further reinforcing his legally recognized position in the United States.

None of this would have happened unless the law first recognized Garcia as a person entitled to its protections. So the notion that he had no legal standing is contradicted by every one of these institutional actions.

All the little fishies have been hooked by the stink bait AGAIN. LOL Democrats will fight for illegal gang-bangers and shrug their shoulders when the gang-bangers rape and kill American women.

 

[Rumpole]

All the little fishies have been hooked by the stink bait AGAIN. LOL Democrats will fight for illegal gang-bangers and shrug their shoulders when the gang-bangers rape and kill American women.

Yes, you'd give that label to anyone based on discredited testimony from an anonymous informant, without granting the accused to confront his accusers, cross examine witnesses, and apparently you're all in for a banana republic. That is the case with Garcia. He may, or may not be, what he has been accused of, but the fact is, he's never been convicted of a crime nor has he had sufficient due process to send him to prison forever, but you're okay with that.

 

[MarathonMike]

Yes, you'd give that label to anyone based on discredited testimony from an anonymous informant, without granting the accused to confront his accusers, cross examine witnesses, and apparently you're all in for a banana republic. That is the case with Garcia. He may, or may not be, what he has been accused of, but the fact is, he's never been convicted of a crime nor has he had sufficient due process to send him to prison forever, but you're okay with that.

He was sent to prison for A YEAR at which time he and the other gang bangers will be released and their fate left up to El Salvador's govt. Besides, Kilmar Garcia is SO LAST WEEK! Your Democrat masters have now directed you to the 4 year old with stage 4 cancer. Try to keep up!