Doesn't our ego make us think we know good from evil ? and what appears to be good for the moment can turn out to be bad in the long run. And ultimately does anything matter anyway ?
Hi DD thanks for your answer, you win the award for shortest explanation:
"ego"
And yes I do think this is related to the gaining of knowledge/self-awareness
but it is debatable if people had this capacity BEFORE biting into more knowledge than we could manage, or if it was a RESULT of that little knowledge becoming a dangerous thing. I think if humans are to be held liable for right and wrong it would have to be for choices we make AFTER we have such knowledge. I truly believe most wrong is out of "fear" of something which indicates a lack of understanding; so if this is corrected, and the fear is overcome, then so is the wrongful word thought or action. By the very nature of knowing enough to become responsible for choices, the matter is resolved anyway! So much of the Judgment process is actually correction; by the time we understand something enough to discern what went wrong, we can correct it in the process or as a result, so why blame?
Other runners-up I asked said
* self
* manna (the Buddhist term for the part of the human conscience that can act out of ego or greed or other selfish or evil desires that animals don't have that respond out of pure instinct nature or emotions but without that added inclination that humans have)
Two people answered
* regret
* guilt
And one of my best friends said this:
* people have the abstract ability to understand "philosophical concepts"
* though we are also animals, we are the only animal on the planet with the ability and responsibility to "rise above" our animal nature and to better ourselves
All the other animals are still restrained by their nature
Longer answers
* people have a sense of past and future
* people have a sense of cultural identity where we identify our "selves"
in relation to external environment and society
Again I think the issue with my friend is that we use the terms
"intelligence" and "spirituality" differently, where we are placing the factor that
makes us different under two different terms. I would not judge it in terms of
"intelligence" and he would not judge it in terms of "spirituality" but we both
acknowledge there is some difference.
If he cannot recognize "ego" again I am guessing it could be several reasons:
1. he fears that people who religiously categorize people and animals at different levels
are doing so out of this "ego" and thus he rejects that notion out of respect for animals
2. he has let go of his own sense of ego to the point he sees no difference
3. or he has such an assumed sense of his own ego and his own understanding
he cannot see past that to see he equally has an ego issue as anyone else does
This could be like a narcisstic or socipathic disorder where he truly sees no
difference between people and animals and does not feel he affects other people
in a higher way. Either so sympathetic with animals he treats them as highly as he does people; or such a lack of empathy with people he sees them no differently than animals,
with no other needs that animals do not also have. I'm not sure where he is with that.
But I hope with the language and terms that you and others have offered, I can at least explain to him that it is NOT just an ego trip that people are saying we are different from animals. There IS an inherent difference in our capacity and design that ALLOWS us to make the bigger mistakes he acknowledges, and also to learn the bigger lessons in life.
So it isn't just random evolution or just happening to make these mistakes.
The animals are not on that same path, not designed for that, and learn within their realm but not on the same trajectory as what humans are designed to follow.
The Buddhists teach that animals can move up the spiritual ladder, and humans can move down, but still teach that humans are in a different class level above animals. And then there are higher awareness levels of humans also. I don't think animals can move up to that without going through the level of human experience. So even within the Buddhist system that holds animals and plants in the highest regard, it still shows a distinction that places human incarnation above animals and not by intelligence but by spiritual levels.