Hegelian Dialectic

[onefour1]

Here is a short definition and a description of the problem we face today from globalists who use this technique. it is from fhu.com(foundation for Human Understanding):

Revolutionaries in government have created economic chaos, shortages in food and fuel, confiscatory taxation, a crisis in education, the threat of war, and other diversions to condition Americans for the “New World Order."

The technique is as old as politics itself. It is the Hegelian Dialectic of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic and hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created by step one: A change which would have been impossible to impose upon the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

Applying the Hegelian Dialectic, and irresistible financial influence, concealed change agents seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves — ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.

Their objective is to emasculate sovereign states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world's people and resources.

Do you believe that our government is trying to destroy our sovereignty to bring about global government? If so, what instances of the Hegelian Dialectic do you see or have you seen in our modern day?

 

[KNB]

That's how marijuana was outlawed.

 

[Unkotare]

Oh look, a freshman in college. What a clever boy.

 

[FA_Q2]

Here is a short definition and a description of the problem we face today from globalists who use this technique. it is from fhu.com(foundation for Human Understanding):

Revolutionaries in government have created economic chaos, shortages in food and fuel, confiscatory taxation, a crisis in education, the threat of war, and other diversions to condition Americans for the “New World Order."

The technique is as old as politics itself. It is the Hegelian Dialectic of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic and hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created by step one: A change which would have been impossible to impose upon the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

Applying the Hegelian Dialectic, and irresistible financial influence, concealed change agents seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves — ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.

Their objective is to emasculate sovereign states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world's people and resources.

Do you believe that our government is trying to destroy our sovereignty to bring about global government? If so, what instances of the Hegelian Dialectic do you see or have you seen in our modern day?

No. The very idea is rather silly. We have managed to amass the majority of the planets wealth and success here in this nation. What possible reason would we have for bringing the rest of the world in on our government? That would mean that we would have to deal with the rampant poverty and problems that the rest of the planet currently faces – something that America REALLY does not want to get into.

There is a reason that we don’t conquer anymore – it’s a pain in the ass. Instead, we influence the world to preserve our interests but do not take control anywhere. Then they can deal with their own problems.

 

[onefour1]

No. The very idea is rather silly. We have managed to amass the majority of the planets wealth and success here in this nation. What possible reason would we have for bringing the rest of the world in on our government? That would mean that we would have to deal with the rampant poverty and problems that the rest of the planet currently faces – something that America REALLY does not want to get into.

There is a reason that we don’t conquer anymore – it’s a pain in the ass. Instead, we influence the world to preserve our interests but do not take control anywhere. Then they can deal with their own problems.

So it is your opinion that there are no globalists that seek for one world government and that it is a silly idea? I don't think the idea is to bring other nations under the U.S. constitution umbrella but to destroy the US constitution and its sovereignty and set up a world government under the United Nations to rule over various divided regions of the planet. Sounds ubsurd? There is alot of talk today about UN Agenda 21. This is a literal agenda of the United Nations first signed by George H. W. Bush. Later it was Bill Clinton who signed Executive Order # 12852 in 1993, creating the President's Council on Sustainable Development. Agenda 21 is a master plan of the globalists to use environmental crises as the Hegelian Dialectic to bring about the change they want. Global Warming, brought on by Clinton's Vice President, Al Gore, has not even been proven yet the US is spending billions of dollars to fight a crises that does not exist.

Another Hegelian Dialectic was implemented in the George W. Bush Administration when the World Trade Centers were destroyed on 911. This paved the way for the globalists to create a terror crisis which has resulted in the patriot act which is a loss of freedom for Americans and the endless battle to hang on to our right to privacy from the NSA. Obama is passing executive orders right and left to destroy our freedoms even now.

The crises they create give them the justification to make more restrictive laws to further their agenda toward one world government. A major goal of the globalists is to depopulate the world. Clinton's executive order lists "population stabilization" as a primary goal. Planned parenthood and the Bill Gates Foundation are some of the ways that this is being implemented.

In the end, the globalists want total control over all people to control nearly all aspects of their lives. Slaves. They want to strip us of our property and control all natural resources. Much of this under the guise of terrorism and environmental crisis. They want to save us from ourselves and they are happy to do it. They want to reduce the poulation by 85 to 90%. But don't take my word for it only, study it out and google the many, many articles on this subject. Watch the youtube videos. Become aware of the globalist's Agenda for world dominance and total control.

 

[francoHFW]

OP- Beckbot idiocy. Actually, well regulated capitalism and representative democracy IS the synthesis of history. Reaganism is a misinformed reaction that is being stopped, thank god. see sig.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

9/11 - middle eastern wars, even Condi Rice admitted on National TV that Bush and Cheney knew that attacks were going to happen.

"Global War on Terrorism" has become, in reality, a "Domestic War on Constitutionalists." NSA, NDAA and gun grabbing.

 

[Clementine]

Here is a short definition and a description of the problem we face today from globalists who use this technique. it is from fhu.com(foundation for Human Understanding):

Revolutionaries in government have created economic chaos, shortages in food and fuel, confiscatory taxation, a crisis in education, the threat of war, and other diversions to condition Americans for the “New World Order."

The technique is as old as politics itself. It is the Hegelian Dialectic of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem (fear, panic and hysteria). The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created by step one: A change which would have been impossible to impose upon the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

Applying the Hegelian Dialectic, and irresistible financial influence, concealed change agents seek to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves — ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure.

Their objective is to emasculate sovereign states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world's people and resources.

Do you believe that our government is trying to destroy our sovereignty to bring about global government? If so, what instances of the Hegelian Dialectic do you see or have you seen in our modern day?

Yes, I do believe that. The left has always praised Europe and has always spoken kindly of dictators. It's no secret that the liberals aren't crazy about capitalism and believe that socialism is the better route. Of course, throughout history, that has failed.

There is much talk of a One World Order and it would mean America bending over and allowing the socialists of the world to take the lead and revamp this country to blend in with them. Obama has gone far to cede America's power to other countries.

The far left acts as if it's a crime to be proud of America or defend the constitution. They find it distasteful to fly our flag. Patriots have been impugned at every turn. The wealthy capitalists have been painted as evil.

The laws become more and more oppressive. We're being conditioned not to feel pride in America, to not question government and the schools are dumbing down students lest history teach them that we're heading in the wrong direction. If enough people believe that government is the best answer to all of life's problems, it will become a reality. Once freedom and liberty are ceded, at least with a majority, it makes it easy for our corrupt leaders to take the next step and form one government to rule the world. We would have the worst of the worst on the planet having a say in how we must live and new laws will be imposed that will ensure future generations never get a taste of the freedom and liberty that too many have taken for granted.

Without getting into an argument on global warming, it's clear that the proposed solution to it has nothing to do with helping the planet and everything to do with redistributing money - our money - throughout the world. We will end up with radicals controlling energy, a must for the fulfillment of the dream that some wannabe tyrants have. Health care has already been taken over, more or less, and what we have now is merely a stepping stone to complete government run health care.

Before there can be a One World Order, it's necessary to take down America as she is and instill a more oppressive, far left government. We're well on our way.

Of course, the libs will rush in to claim that everything the left has done is for the greater good. Alinsky would be proud. To convince people that we are on the right track, they cite statistics that are bogus, but the uneducated buy it hook, line and sinker.

The economy is not better. GM isn't really alive since it's still on support. We have Obama's word that bin Laden is dead. Obama has not deported more illegals than others. Unemployment is not really down.

They simply adopted new ways of figuring statistics. They count the number of illegals stopped from coming in as deportations. They quit counting the number of people who gave up on finding a job after 52 weeks.

It's all an illusion, but necessary to put "facts" that prove their agenda is working to shut people up. The false claim is that we are beginning to head in the right direction, so they must have more time to complete this. The left has no desire to repair America. The goal is to dismantle and change us in a way our founders never intended. Be clear on that.

When I look at some polls, it's clear that the left is in trouble going in to the next election. The problem for the right is that they haven't been able to choose the best candidates. I hope they realize that it's no time to play it safe and choose the candidate that seems moderate and gets treated decent by the press. The media will do their best to help choose the candidate that Hillary will run against and I hope the GOP wises up this time and doesn't allow that. We need someone outspoken, ready to do battle and has the courage to fight against the liberal media that will be ganging up on them.

Even if the Repubs were to take the House and Senate, Obama is prepared to take his poison pen and continue with his agenda. The libs have never been this close before to seeing their dream becoming reality. They will fight harder than ever before to make this happen and the lies will increase just as much as the vicious attacks on the opposition.

This is going to get worse before it, hopefully, gets better.

 

[FA_Q2]

No. The very idea is rather silly. We have managed to amass the majority of the planets wealth and success here in this nation. What possible reason would we have for bringing the rest of the world in on our government? That would mean that we would have to deal with the rampant poverty and problems that the rest of the planet currently faces – something that America REALLY does not want to get into.

There is a reason that we don’t conquer anymore – it’s a pain in the ass. Instead, we influence the world to preserve our interests but do not take control anywhere. Then they can deal with their own problems.

So it is your opinion that there are no globalists that seek for one world government and that it is a silly idea? I don't think the idea is to bring other nations under the U.S. constitution umbrella but to destroy the US constitution and its sovereignty and set up a world government under the United Nations to rule over various divided regions of the planet. Sounds ubsurd? There is alot of talk today about UN Agenda 21. This is a literal agenda of the United Nations first signed by George H. W. Bush. Later it was Bill Clinton who signed Executive Order # 12852 in 1993, creating the President's Council on Sustainable Development. Agenda 21 is a master plan of the globalists to use environmental crises as the Hegelian Dialectic to bring about the change they want. Global Warming, brought on by Clinton's Vice President, Al Gore, has not even been proven yet the US is spending billions of dollars to fight a crises that does not exist.

Another Hegelian Dialectic was implemented in the George W. Bush Administration when the World Trade Centers were destroyed on 911. This paved the way for the globalists to create a terror crisis which has resulted in the patriot act which is a loss of freedom for Americans and the endless battle to hang on to our right to privacy from the NSA. Obama is passing executive orders right and left to destroy our freedoms even now.

The crises they create give them the justification to make more restrictive laws to further their agenda toward one world government. A major goal of the globalists is to depopulate the world. Clinton's executive order lists "population stabilization" as a primary goal. Planned parenthood and the Bill Gates Foundation are some of the ways that this is being implemented.

In the end, the globalists want total control over all people to control nearly all aspects of their lives. Slaves. They want to strip us of our property and control all natural resources. Much of this under the guise of terrorism and environmental crisis. They want to save us from ourselves and they are happy to do it. They want to reduce the poulation by 85 to 90%. But don't take my word for it only, study it out and google the many, many articles on this subject. Watch the youtube videos. Become aware of the globalist's Agenda for world dominance and total control.

No, that is not my opinion. There certainly are globalists that want to see a single world government. There are many people that believe such would be a wonderful thing and actively work towards that goal.

My contention is that our GOVERNMENT (in general) does not want such a thing to happen. The reality here is that a move in that direction would take away from the US position and wealth a great amount. What are the incentives for the US? There are none at all - we would lose all around.

Agenda 21 is massively mischaracterized and used as a conspiracy theory all over the place. The VAST majority of what is stated about it is flat out incorrect.

 

[TheOldSchool]

That's how marijuana was outlawed.

AND it is how it will be legalized once again!!!