Harder to Cheat In WI.

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
65,087
Reaction score
59,277
Points
3,600
I guess being a citizen means nothing to the Democrats. Absentee ballots without signatures? Really?

Washington D.C.-based law firm Elias Law Group, led by Democrat attorney and Russian collusion hoaxer Marc Elias, failed to convince a federal judge in a recent case challenging Wisconsin’s election integrity laws. The firm’s argument, which the presiding judge termed “head-scratching,” sought to challenge the state’s statute mandating that a U.S. citizen must witness and sign an absentee voter’s ballot. According to Elias Law Group, this infringed upon voting and civil rights.

Presiding over the case was U.S. District Court Chief Judge James D. Peterson, an Obama-appointed judge. He dismissed the petition against the Wisconsin Elections Commission, expressing his consternation at the claims, insinuating that they lacked logic and soundness.









“The absurd results to which plaintiffs’ interpretation would lead are reason enough to reject that interpretation,” Peterson wrote. “It is plaintiffs’ interpretation that leads to head-scratching results.”

 
If Trump loses the election (presuming he loses Wisconsin) you guys will swear cheating took place on every ballot.
 
I guess being a citizen means nothing to the Democrats. Absentee ballots without signatures? Really?

Washington D.C.-based law firm Elias Law Group, led by Democrat attorney and Russian collusion hoaxer Marc Elias, failed to convince a federal judge in a recent case challenging Wisconsin’s election integrity laws. The firm’s argument, which the presiding judge termed “head-scratching,” sought to challenge the state’s statute mandating that a U.S. citizen must witness and sign an absentee voter’s ballot. According to Elias Law Group, this infringed upon voting and civil rights.

Presiding over the case was U.S. District Court Chief Judge James D. Peterson, an Obama-appointed judge. He dismissed the petition against the Wisconsin Elections Commission, expressing his consternation at the claims, insinuating that they lacked logic and soundness.









“The absurd results to which plaintiffs’ interpretation would lead are reason enough to reject that interpretation,” Peterson wrote. “It is plaintiffs’ interpretation that leads to head-scratching results.”


The DNC stated that an accurate voter database was an "existential threat"

They need to cheat to survive
 
Back
Top Bottom